基于内检测评价的管道安全维修决策
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:ILI assessment based policy-making on pipeline safety maintenance
  • 作者:崔凯燕 ; 王晓霖 ; 杨文 ; 谢成
  • 英文作者:CUI Kaiyan;WANG Xiaolin;YANG Wen;XIE Cheng;Sinopec Dalian Research Institute of Petroleum and Petrochemicals;Sinopec Marketing South China Company;
  • 关键词:内检测(ILI) ; 腐蚀缺陷 ; 凹陷 ; 制造缺陷 ; 剩余强度 ; 腐蚀速率 ; 安全维修时限 ; 维修决策
  • 英文关键词:in-line inspection(ILI);;corrosion defect;;dent;;manufacturing defect;;residual strength;;corrosion rate;;safety maintenance time;;decision-making on maintenance
  • 中文刊名:ZAQK
  • 英文刊名:China Safety Science Journal
  • 机构:中国石油化工股份有限公司大连石油化工研究院;中国石化销售有限公司华南分公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:中国安全科学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.29
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划课题(2017YFF0210404);; 中国石油化工集团公司资助项目(CLY18053)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZAQK201902030
  • 页数:6
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-2865/X
  • 分类号:176-181
摘要
为科学合理地制定管道维修维护计划,研究含腐蚀缺陷管道剩余强度评价方法的估计维修因子(ERF)曲线,分析不同方法的适用性,提出腐蚀速率分段求解和基于边界条件约束的管道安全维修时限概念;依据检测深度、缺陷位置、其他缺陷影响等因素,定性评价凹陷是否可接受;采用SHANNON方法 ERF曲线量化分析含制造缺陷管道的剩余强度;在此基础上,制定不同缺陷的维修决策判定准则,形成一套全新的管道安全维修决策技术;最后,以某管道为例,分析管道的内检测(ILI)数据,验证成套技术的适用性。结果表明:用该套技术能确定管体各类缺陷的安全维修时限和维修响应等级。
        To make a scientific and reasonable maintenance decision for pipeline,applicability for different methods for pipeline with corrosion defects was analyzed by means of estimated repair factor( ERF)-curves for different residual strength assessment methods. A concept of pipeline safety maintenance time was performed based on segmented corrosion rate calculation and boundary constraint conditions.Factors including detected depth,defects location and influence from other defects were adopted to assess acceptability of dent qualitatively. The residual strength for pipe with manufacturing defects was analyzed quantitatively by using ERF-curve of SHANNON. On this basis,maintenance decision-making criteria were set for different defects,thus a new safey maintenance decision-making technology was developed for pipeline. Finally,a specific pipeline was taken as example,with analyzing of its ILI data,the feasibility of the technology was verified. The result shows that the technology can be used to determine the safety maintenance time and maintenance response level for different defects of pipeline.
引文
[1]刘凤艳.基于漏磁内检测的长输油气管道完整性评价研究[D].沈阳:沈阳工业大学,2014.LIU Fengyan.Research on integrity assessment of lone distance pipeline based on the magnetic flux leakage testing[D].Shenyan:Shenyang University of Technology,2014.
    [2]洪险峰,崔昊,贾会英,等.浅谈含缺陷管道的完整性评价及维护维修[J].长江大学学报:自然科学版,2011,8(11):48-50.HONG Xianfeng,CUI Hao,JIA Huiying,et al.Introduction to integrity assessment and maintenance of pipeline with defects[J].Journal of Yangtze University:Nat Sci Edit,2011,8(11):48-50.
    [3]崔进起,于晓勇,郭泽荣.基于ANSYS有限元法的长输油气腐蚀管道剩余强度与剩余寿命研究[J].实验技术与管理,2010,27(10):56-59.CUI Jinqi,YU Xiaoyong,GUO Zerong.Study of residual strength and remaining life for the long-distance oil and gas corroded pipeline based on ANSYS[J].Experimental Technology and Management,2010,27(10):56-59.
    [4]陈兆雄,吴明,谢飞,等.腐蚀管道剩余强度的评价方法及剩余寿命预测[J].机械工程材料,2015,39(5):97-106.CHEN Zhaoxiong,WU Ming,XIE Fei,et al.Residual strength evaluation methodology and residual life prediction of corroded pipeline[J].Materials for Mechanical Engineering,2015,39(5):97-106.
    [5]于洋,刘德俊,孙东旭.基于漏磁内检测与分级理念的管道完整性评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2017,27(1):169-174.YU Yang,LIU Dejun,SUN Dongxu.Pipeline integrity assessment based on combining magnetic flux leakage detection with grading evaluation[J].China Safety Science Journal,2017,27(1):169-174.
    [6]KIEFNER J F,VIETH P H.A modified criterion for evaluating the strength of corroded pipe[R].Battelle Columbus Div.,1989.
    [7]焦中良,帅健.含凹陷管道的完整性评价[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2011,33(4):157-164.JIAO Zhongliang,SHUAI Jian.Integrity assessment of pipeline with dents[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science&Technology Edition,2011,33(4):157-164.
    [8]陈健,汤怡,孙雷,等.某河底穿越管道环焊缝缺陷的安全评价[J].油气储运,2014,33(11):1 222-1 224.CHEN Jian,TANG Yi,SUN Lei,et al.Safety evaluation of girth weld defect of a river bottom crossing pipeline[J].Oil&Gas Storage and Transportation,2014,33(11):1 222-1 224.
    [9]崔凯燕,王晓霖,董列武,等.管道腐蚀缺陷的安全维修时限的确定方法和装置:中国,CN201610798888.7[P].2018-03-13.
    [10]杨静,柏盛鹏.某输气管道基于内检测的腐蚀评价与维修决策[J].当代化工,2016,45(4):871-873,877.YANG Jing,BAI Shengpeng.Assessment and maintenance decision of corrosion defects based on ILI for a gas transmission pipeline[J].Contemporary Chemical Industry,2016,45(4):871-873,877.
    [11]ASME B31G-2012,Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipeline[S].
    [12]BS 7910-2013,Guidance to methods of assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structure[S].
    [13]DNV RP F101,Recommended practice F101:corroded pipelines[S].2015.
    [14]KIEFNER J F,VIETH P H.New method corrects criterion for evaluating corroded pipe[J].Oil&Gas Journal,1990,88(32):56-59.
    [15]帅健,张春娥,陈福来.基于爆破试验数据对腐蚀管道剩余强度评定方法的验证[J].压力容器,2006,23(10):5-7.SHUAI Jian,ZHANG Chun'e,CHEN Fulai.Validation of assessment method for remaining strength of corroded pipeline based on burst test data[J].Pressure Vessel,2006,23(10):5-7.
    [16]SHANNON R W E.The failure behavior of line pipe defects[J].International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,1974,2(4):243-255.
    [17]姜晓红,洪险峰,郑景娜,等.油气管道凹陷的评价与管理[J].长江大学学报:自然科学版,2014,11(14):118-121.JIANG Xiaohong,HONG Xianfeng,ZHENG Jingna,et al.Assessment and management of dent in oil and natural gas pipeline[J].Journal of Yangtze University:Nat Sci Edit,2014,11(14):118-121.
    [18]ASME B31.8-2014,Gas transmission and distribution piping systems[S].
    [19]API RP 1160,Managing system integrity for hazardous liquid pipelines[S].2013.
    [20]付桂英,郭瑞杰.管道中常见缺陷类型分析及寿命预测相关建议[C].第三届油气储运技术交流大会论文集,2012:1 231-1 235.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700