山东省城市旅游安全水平测度与分析
|
摘要
随着城市旅游的快速发展,旅游安全问题频发,亟须系统构建城市旅游安全评价体系为城市旅游安全管理与建设提供科学指导。本研究在明确城市旅游安全内涵的基础上,从环境因素、设施设备、管理措施三个方面,构建城市旅游安全评价指标体系,运用熵值法综合测度山东省17地市旅游安全水平。研究结果表明:(1)山东省17个地市的旅游安全水平总体偏低且不均衡,区域差异大,并呈现出"X"形的空间分布特征;(2)烟台、青岛、济南属旅游安全高水平城市,临沂、济宁属旅游安全较高水平城市,菏泽、潍坊、威海、泰安属旅游安全中等水平城市,枣庄、淄博、德州、滨州、东营、聊城和日照属旅游安全较低水平城市,莱芜属旅游安全低水平城市。
With the rapid development of urban tourism,tourism security problems frequently occur.Therefore,it is urgent to build an urban tourism safety evaluation system to provide scientific guidance for urban tourism safety management and construction.Based on the definition of urban tourism safety,this study constructed an urban tourism safety evaluation index system from the perspectives of environmental factors,facilities and equipment,management measures,using the entropy method to measure the tourism safety level of 17 cities in Shandong province.The research results show that:(1) The tourism safety level of 17 cities in Shandong province is generally low and unbalanced,with large regional differences,and presents the spatial distribution characteristics of "X" type.(2) Yantai,Qingdao and Jinan are cities with high level of tourism safety;Linyi and Jining are cities with relatively high level of tourism safety.Heze,Weifang,Weihai and Taian are medium level cities for tourism safety.Zaozhuang,Zibo,Texas,Binzhou,Dongying,Liaocheng and Rizhao are cities with relatively low level of tourism safety.Laiwu is the low level tourism safety city.
With the rapid development of urban tourism,tourism security problems frequently occur.Therefore,it is urgent to build an urban tourism safety evaluation system to provide scientific guidance for urban tourism safety management and construction.Based on the definition of urban tourism safety,this study constructed an urban tourism safety evaluation index system from the perspectives of environmental factors,facilities and equipment,management measures,using the entropy method to measure the tourism safety level of 17 cities in Shandong province.The research results show that:(1) The tourism safety level of 17 cities in Shandong province is generally low and unbalanced,with large regional differences,and presents the spatial distribution characteristics of "X" type.(2) Yantai,Qingdao and Jinan are cities with high level of tourism safety;Linyi and Jining are cities with relatively high level of tourism safety.Heze,Weifang,Weihai and Taian are medium level cities for tourism safety.Zaozhuang,Zibo,Texas,Binzhou,Dongying,Liaocheng and Rizhao are cities with relatively low level of tourism safety.Laiwu is the low level tourism safety city.
引文
[1]吴巧红.老年旅游安全保障体系的构建[J].旅游学刊,2015,30(8):10-12.
[2]范云峰.女性旅游安全需求与消费行为研究[J].湖北社会科学,2011(8):95-97.
[3]陈岩英,谢朝武.旅游城市安全风险的游客感知评价及管理研究——以厦门为例[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(4):29-35.
[4]邹雅真,谢朝武.大陆游客赴台旅游安全事件结果特征及其引致因素研究[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(8):81-89.
[5]蔡善柱,陆林.黄山市旅游安全信息管理:体系构建、问题与对策[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,35(6):583-588.
[6]陈水雄,陈炫,范武波.休闲农业及其旅游安全特性研究——兼谈海南休闲农业旅游安全保障体系的构建[J].生态经济,2013(12):158-161.
[7]郑向敏.旅游安全概论[M].北京:中国旅游出版社,2009.
[8]张捷雷,周国忠.城市旅游安全指标体系的构建及实证研究——以杭州为例[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):121-126.
[2]范云峰.女性旅游安全需求与消费行为研究[J].湖北社会科学,2011(8):95-97.
[3]陈岩英,谢朝武.旅游城市安全风险的游客感知评价及管理研究——以厦门为例[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(4):29-35.
[4]邹雅真,谢朝武.大陆游客赴台旅游安全事件结果特征及其引致因素研究[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(8):81-89.
[5]蔡善柱,陆林.黄山市旅游安全信息管理:体系构建、问题与对策[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,35(6):583-588.
[6]陈水雄,陈炫,范武波.休闲农业及其旅游安全特性研究——兼谈海南休闲农业旅游安全保障体系的构建[J].生态经济,2013(12):158-161.
[7]郑向敏.旅游安全概论[M].北京:中国旅游出版社,2009.
[8]张捷雷,周国忠.城市旅游安全指标体系的构建及实证研究——以杭州为例[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):121-126.