“文史者,讥评文人之得失也”语源辨正
|
摘要
钱基博先生等在引用"《中兴艺文志》:‘文史者,讥评文人之得失也’"一语追溯文史之名的缘起时,将《中兴艺文志》认为是《中兴书目》,后为众多学者沿袭引用。另外,亦有学者将《中兴艺文志》认为是《中兴馆阁书目》或者《中兴馆阁艺文志》,然此三种说法皆非是。《文献通考》中所称的《中兴艺文志》实为《中兴国史艺文志》之简称,"文史者,所以讥评文人之得失也"一语应为《中兴艺文志》文史类小序中语。由于该书已佚,而《中兴馆阁书目》作为南宋官修书目较为著名,从而致后世学者误将二书混淆。
When Qian Jibo citing "Zhongxing Yiwenzhi: ‘the sort of literature and history is used to evaluate the success and failure of writers' ", he put Zhongxing Yiwenzhi mistaken for Zhongxing Shumu, the sentence is quoted by many scholars today. More than that, other scholars put Zhongxing Yiwenzhi mistaken for Zhongxing Guange Shumu or Zhongxing Guange Yiwenzhi. In fact, Zhongxing Yiwenzhi is the abbreviation of Zhongxing Guoshi Yiwenzhi in Wenxian Tongkao. Because Zhongxing Yiwenzhi had disappeared, and Zhongxing Shumu was famous as well, the two books were mixed up by scholars.
When Qian Jibo citing "Zhongxing Yiwenzhi: ‘the sort of literature and history is used to evaluate the success and failure of writers' ", he put Zhongxing Yiwenzhi mistaken for Zhongxing Shumu, the sentence is quoted by many scholars today. More than that, other scholars put Zhongxing Yiwenzhi mistaken for Zhongxing Guange Shumu or Zhongxing Guange Yiwenzhi. In fact, Zhongxing Yiwenzhi is the abbreviation of Zhongxing Guoshi Yiwenzhi in Wenxian Tongkao. Because Zhongxing Yiwenzhi had disappeared, and Zhongxing Shumu was famous as well, the two books were mixed up by scholars.
引文
[1]周靖.百年中国历史教育箴言集萃[M].上海:学林出版社,2012:19.
[2]钱基博.现代中国文学史[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2004:4.
[3]谢无量.中国大文学史[M].上海:中华书局,1940:41.
[4]朱星元.中国文学史外论[M].上海:东方学术社,1935:79.
[5]中国国民党中央委员会党史委员会.张维翰先生文集:上册[M].台北:中国国民党中央委员会党史委员会,1986:2.
[6]曹旭,吴承学.庆祝王运熙教授八十华诞文集[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,2005:611.
[7]张三夕.华中学术:第3辑[C].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2011:65.
[8]金启华.十三部中国文学史简评[N].北京:语文导报,1985(17).
[9]贺严.中国古代文学史基础书目概述[M].北京:中国工人出版社,2012:181.
[10]戴燕.文学史的权力[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002:20.
[11]董乃斌,陈伯海,刘扬忠.中国文学史学史:第二卷[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,2003:35.
[12]彭玉平.诗文评的体性[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:6.
[13]周勋初.周勋初文集:7[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,2000:228.
[14]龚鹏程.中国文学史:下册[M].北京:世界图书出版公司北京公司,2012:69.
[15]马端临.文献通考:卷二四八经籍考七五[M].北京:中华书局,2011:6672.
[16]脱脱,等.宋史:卷二〇二艺文一[M].北京:中华书局,1985:5033.
[17]王应麟.玉海卷四六[M].文渊阁四库全书本.
[18]脱脱,等.宋史:卷四四理宗四[M].北京:中华书局,1985:853.
[19]脱脱,等.宋史:卷四四理宗四[M].北京:中华书局,1985:859.
[20]王承略,刘心明.二十五史艺文经籍志补萃编:第二十卷[M].北京:清华大学出版社.2013:545.
[21]刘向培.中兴馆阁书目重辑与考述[D].上海:华东师范大学硕士学位论文,2015:15.
[2]钱基博.现代中国文学史[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2004:4.
[3]谢无量.中国大文学史[M].上海:中华书局,1940:41.
[4]朱星元.中国文学史外论[M].上海:东方学术社,1935:79.
[5]中国国民党中央委员会党史委员会.张维翰先生文集:上册[M].台北:中国国民党中央委员会党史委员会,1986:2.
[6]曹旭,吴承学.庆祝王运熙教授八十华诞文集[C].上海:上海古籍出版社,2005:611.
[7]张三夕.华中学术:第3辑[C].武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2011:65.
[8]金启华.十三部中国文学史简评[N].北京:语文导报,1985(17).
[9]贺严.中国古代文学史基础书目概述[M].北京:中国工人出版社,2012:181.
[10]戴燕.文学史的权力[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002:20.
[11]董乃斌,陈伯海,刘扬忠.中国文学史学史:第二卷[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,2003:35.
[12]彭玉平.诗文评的体性[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:6.
[13]周勋初.周勋初文集:7[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,2000:228.
[14]龚鹏程.中国文学史:下册[M].北京:世界图书出版公司北京公司,2012:69.
[15]马端临.文献通考:卷二四八经籍考七五[M].北京:中华书局,2011:6672.
[16]脱脱,等.宋史:卷二〇二艺文一[M].北京:中华书局,1985:5033.
[17]王应麟.玉海卷四六[M].文渊阁四库全书本.
[18]脱脱,等.宋史:卷四四理宗四[M].北京:中华书局,1985:853.
[19]脱脱,等.宋史:卷四四理宗四[M].北京:中华书局,1985:859.
[20]王承略,刘心明.二十五史艺文经籍志补萃编:第二十卷[M].北京:清华大学出版社.2013:545.
[21]刘向培.中兴馆阁书目重辑与考述[D].上海:华东师范大学硕士学位论文,2015:15.