刑事缺席审判与判决前财产没收程序适用关系研究
|
摘要
刑事缺席审判程序是应对因涉嫌贪污贿赂等犯罪的犯罪嫌疑人、被告人潜逃境外无法进行刑事追诉难题的程序创新,其创设具有对外宣示和对内回应双重价值。这一程序与判决前财产没收程序存在适用范围的竞合。刑事缺席审判程序覆盖事项全面、规范解释优先和裁判效力权威的优势,决定了其效力位阶高于判决前财产没收程序。但在具体适用中,当二者存在适用空间模糊时,由于判决前财产没收程序在裁判稳定性和可执行性方面的优势,应当优先适用判决前财产没收程序。
Trial by default is a procedural innovation to solve the problem that the defenders,who are suspected of crimes of corruption and terror, but who are absconding abroad and can't be prosecuted. It is valuable for announcement abroad and responding inland. Its scope of application overlaps with that of confiscation before judgment. Trial by default can deal with a more comprehensive matter. It is advantaged in explanation of rules and the authority of procedural efficiency. Thus trial by default has the prior level to confiscation before judgement. However, based on the advantages of the stability and the execution of judgements, confiscation before judgement should be applied preferentially when there is some confusion in the scope of application.
Trial by default is a procedural innovation to solve the problem that the defenders,who are suspected of crimes of corruption and terror, but who are absconding abroad and can't be prosecuted. It is valuable for announcement abroad and responding inland. Its scope of application overlaps with that of confiscation before judgment. Trial by default can deal with a more comprehensive matter. It is advantaged in explanation of rules and the authority of procedural efficiency. Thus trial by default has the prior level to confiscation before judgement. However, based on the advantages of the stability and the execution of judgements, confiscation before judgement should be applied preferentially when there is some confusion in the scope of application.
引文
[1]樊崇义.腐败犯罪缺席审判程序的立法观察[J].人民法治,2018(3).
[2]袁义康.刑事缺席审判程序的合理性及其完善[J].华东政法大学学报,2019(2).
[3]施鹏鹏.缺席审判程序的进步与局限[J].法学杂志,2019(6).
[4]顾永忠,张子君.我国刑事缺席审判制度的立法意图与特色[J].理论学刊,2019(1).
[5]黄风.对外逃人员缺席审判需注意的法律问题[J].法治研究,2018(4).
(1)根据对刑事诉讼法所确立缺席审判制度的规范内容的分析,刑事诉讼审判包括贪污受贿等特定犯罪的缺席审判、被告人无法出庭自愿放弃在场权的缺席审判和被告人死亡的缺席审判三种类型。其中第一种与判决前财产没收程序关联度最密切,因此本文将研究的范围限定在涉嫌贪污受贿、恐怖主义犯罪等特定犯罪嫌疑人、被告人潜逃境外缺席审判这一特定类型。
[2]袁义康.刑事缺席审判程序的合理性及其完善[J].华东政法大学学报,2019(2).
[3]施鹏鹏.缺席审判程序的进步与局限[J].法学杂志,2019(6).
[4]顾永忠,张子君.我国刑事缺席审判制度的立法意图与特色[J].理论学刊,2019(1).
[5]黄风.对外逃人员缺席审判需注意的法律问题[J].法治研究,2018(4).
(1)根据对刑事诉讼法所确立缺席审判制度的规范内容的分析,刑事诉讼审判包括贪污受贿等特定犯罪的缺席审判、被告人无法出庭自愿放弃在场权的缺席审判和被告人死亡的缺席审判三种类型。其中第一种与判决前财产没收程序关联度最密切,因此本文将研究的范围限定在涉嫌贪污受贿、恐怖主义犯罪等特定犯罪嫌疑人、被告人潜逃境外缺席审判这一特定类型。