小学生心理素质量表(简化版)的性别和纵向等值性
|
摘要
目的:本研究旨在检验小学生心理素质量表(简化版)(Pupils’Psychological Suzhi Scale-Simplified Version,PPSS-SV)在不同性别小学生中的测量等值性,并检验它在小学生中跨时间的测量等值性。方法:通过分层随机抽样抽取重庆市5所小学的461名男生和402名女生为调查对象,使用PPSS-SV质水平,两次调查时间间隔为6个月。结果:对调查数据进行验证性因素分析多组比较,结果显示PPSS-SV在小学男生和女生样本间的形态等值、弱等值、强等值和严格等值模型均可被接受。PPSS-SV弱等值、强等值和严格等值模型均可被接受。结论:PPSS-SV的三因子结构在小学男生和女生之间具有测量等值性,并且具有跨时间的测量等值性。
Objective: This study aimed to test the measurement invariance of the Pupils' Psychological Suzhi ScaleSimplified Version(PPSS-SV) across gender and time in a sample of Chinese pupils. Methods: Through random stratified sampling, 461 boys and 402 girls from five elementary schools in Chongqing were recruited as participants. The PPSS-SV was used to measure the participants' psychological Suzhi twice. The interval between the two surveys was 6 months. Results: Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the survey data. The results showed that configural,weak, strong and strict invariance of the PPSS-SV across gender and time were all acceptable. Conclusion: The 3-factor structure of PPSS-SV emerges as invariant across gender and time.
Objective: This study aimed to test the measurement invariance of the Pupils' Psychological Suzhi ScaleSimplified Version(PPSS-SV) across gender and time in a sample of Chinese pupils. Methods: Through random stratified sampling, 461 boys and 402 girls from five elementary schools in Chongqing were recruited as participants. The PPSS-SV was used to measure the participants' psychological Suzhi twice. The interval between the two surveys was 6 months. Results: Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to test the survey data. The results showed that configural,weak, strong and strict invariance of the PPSS-SV across gender and time were all acceptable. Conclusion: The 3-factor structure of PPSS-SV emerges as invariant across gender and time.
引文
1张大均,王鑫强.心理健康与心理素质的关系:内涵结构分析.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2012,38(3):69-74
2张大均,冯正直,郭成,等.关于学生心理素质研究的几个问题.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2000,26(3):56-62
3张大均.论人的心理素质.心理与行为研究,2003,1(2):143-146
4刘衍玲.小学生心理素质与学业成绩关系的研究.重庆:西南师范大学,2001
5易雯静.小学生心理素质问卷的修编及其特点研究.重庆:西南大学,2010
6张大均,苏志强.小学生心理素质量表的编制.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2015,41(3):89-95
7潘彦谷,张大均,武丽丽.小学生心理素质问卷的修订及验证--基于双因子模型.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2017,43(2):127-133
8张大均,陆星月,程刚,等.小学生心理素质量表全国常模的制定.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2017,43(6):91-97
9赵占锋,张大均,刘广增,李冰冰,潘彦谷.小学生家庭亲密度与学校归属感:心理素质和自我概念的链式中介作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(6):1143-1146
10 French BF,Finch WH,Confirmatory Factor Analytic Procedures for the Determination of Measurement Invariance.Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal,2006,13(3):378-402
11冯正直,汪涛,杨国愉,等.心理素质训练对军人应对方式的影响.医学争鸣,2006,27(4):301-304
12 Vandenberg RJ,Lance CE.A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:Suggestions,practices,and recommendations for organizational research.Organizational Research Methods,2000,5(3):139-158
13 Satorra A,Bentler PM.A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis.Psychometrika,2001,66(4):507-514
14 Bentler PM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,1999,6(1):1-55
15 Cheung GW,Rensvold RB.Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance.Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal,2002,9(2):233-255
16 Meade AW,Johnson EC,Braddy PW.Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.Journal of Applied Psychology,2008,93(3):568-592
17王孟成.潜变量建模与Mplus应用.基础篇.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2014
18何嘉悦,钟雪,袁术文,姚树桥.老年抑郁量表在老年人群中的纵向等值性.中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(4):655-658
2张大均,冯正直,郭成,等.关于学生心理素质研究的几个问题.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2000,26(3):56-62
3张大均.论人的心理素质.心理与行为研究,2003,1(2):143-146
4刘衍玲.小学生心理素质与学业成绩关系的研究.重庆:西南师范大学,2001
5易雯静.小学生心理素质问卷的修编及其特点研究.重庆:西南大学,2010
6张大均,苏志强.小学生心理素质量表的编制.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2015,41(3):89-95
7潘彦谷,张大均,武丽丽.小学生心理素质问卷的修订及验证--基于双因子模型.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2017,43(2):127-133
8张大均,陆星月,程刚,等.小学生心理素质量表全国常模的制定.西南大学学报(社会科学版),2017,43(6):91-97
9赵占锋,张大均,刘广增,李冰冰,潘彦谷.小学生家庭亲密度与学校归属感:心理素质和自我概念的链式中介作用.中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(6):1143-1146
10 French BF,Finch WH,Confirmatory Factor Analytic Procedures for the Determination of Measurement Invariance.Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal,2006,13(3):378-402
11冯正直,汪涛,杨国愉,等.心理素质训练对军人应对方式的影响.医学争鸣,2006,27(4):301-304
12 Vandenberg RJ,Lance CE.A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature:Suggestions,practices,and recommendations for organizational research.Organizational Research Methods,2000,5(3):139-158
13 Satorra A,Bentler PM.A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis.Psychometrika,2001,66(4):507-514
14 Bentler PM.Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,1999,6(1):1-55
15 Cheung GW,Rensvold RB.Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance.Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal,2002,9(2):233-255
16 Meade AW,Johnson EC,Braddy PW.Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.Journal of Applied Psychology,2008,93(3):568-592
17王孟成.潜变量建模与Mplus应用.基础篇.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2014
18何嘉悦,钟雪,袁术文,姚树桥.老年抑郁量表在老年人群中的纵向等值性.中国临床心理学杂志,2017,25(4):655-658