摘要
目的比较神经系统疾病在ICD-11与ICD-10中的分布范围。方法从3个维度比较ICD-10类目、亚目与ICD-11 4位码、5位码和6位码分布范围的数量和比例。结果 ICD-11中神经系统疾病共有318种,而ICD-10中仅有157种。结论 ICD-11比ICD-10疾病覆盖范围更广,分类更加细致。科研人员可根据ICD-11疾病的分布范围,在ICD-10中确定编码,可使编码更加准确,疾病范围确定更加全面。
Objective To compare the distribution of nervous system diseases in ICD-11 and ICD-10. Methods They were compared from three dimensions in number and proportion on ICD-10 category, subhead category and ICD-11 4 bit code, 5 bit code and 6 bit code. Results There were 318 kinds of neurological diseases in ICD-11, while only 157 in ICD-10. Conclusion ICD-11 has a wide coverage and more detailed classification than ICD-10. Researchers can code in ICD-10 according to the distribution of ICD-11, who will code more accurate and the range of disease will be more comprehensive.
引文
[1]张萌,廖爱民,刘海民,等.ICD-11与ICD-10分类体系的对比研究[J].中国病案,2016,17(6):21-24.
[2]World Health Organization.The ICD Foundation Component[EB/OL].http://appswhoint/classifications/icd11/browse/l-m/en.
[3]World Health Organization.The ICD Linearization[EB/OL].http://appswhoint/classifications/icd11/browse/l-m/en.
[4]World Health Organization.International Classification of Disease for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics)[EB/OL]https://icd.who.int/dev11/l-m/zh#/.
[5]世界卫生组织.ICD10疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类[M].董景五,译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
[6]World Health Organization.ICD-11 Reference Guide(draft)[Z].2017-10-09.
[7]廖爱民,张萌,刘爱民.ICD-11扩展码应用的探讨[J].中国病案,2017,18(4):45-47.
[8]World Health Organization.ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics(2018)[EB/OL].https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en.
[9]郑卫萍.从ICD-11的设计看对我国病案工作的影响[J]中国病案,2011,12(10):36-37,35
[10]杨兰,于明.ICD-11的模型与修订进展[J].中国病案,2015,5:20-24,61
[11]杨朝晖,索冠伟.最新国际疾病分类精神分裂症和其他原发性精神障碍精神症状评定进展[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2018,44(1):55-57.
[12]Gaebel W,Jessen F,Kanba S.Neurocognitive disorders in ICD-11:the debate and its outcome[J].World Psychiatry,2018,17(2):229-230.doi:10.1002/wps.20534.
[13]Luciano M.The contribution of the WPA to the production of the ICD-11 chapter on mental,behavioural or neurodevelopmental disorders[J].World Psychiatry,2018,17(2):239-240.doi:10.1002/wps.20541.
[14]Chute CG.The rendering of human phenotype and rare diseases in ICD-11[J].J Inherit Metab Dis,2018,41(3):563-569.
[15]Moser C.Paraphilias and the ICD-11:Progress but Still Logically Inconsistent[J].Arch Sex Behav,2018,47(4):825-826.doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1141-z.
[16]Shakir R,Davis S,Norrving B,et al.Revising the ICD:stroke is a brain disease[J].Lancet,2016,388(10059):2475.
[17]Shakir R,Norrving B.Stroke in ICD-11:the end of a long exile[J].Lancet,2017,389(10087):2373.doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31567-2.
[18]Boerma T,Harrison J,Jakob R,et al.Revising the ICD:explaining the WHO approach[J].Lancet,2016,338(10059):2476-2477.
[19]Sundararajan V,Romano PS,Quan H,et al.Capturing diagnosis-timing in ICD-coded hospital data:recommendations from the WHO ICD-11 topic advisory group on quality and safety[J].Int J Qual Health Care,2015,27(4):328-333.
[20]Southern DA,Pincus HA,Romano PS,et al.Enhanced capture of healthcare-related harms and injuries in the11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases(ICD-11)[J].Int J Qual Health Care,2016,28(1):136-142.doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzv099.