以皖豆28为受体的抗草甘膦转基因大豆的获得及后代抗性鉴定与分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Identification and progenies analysis of the transgenic glyphosate-resistant soybean with recepor of Wandou 28
  • 作者:武湘豫 ; 张家进 ; 曹越平
  • 英文作者:WU Xiang-yu;ZHANG Jia-jin;CAO Yue-ping;School of Agriculture and Biology,ShanghaiJiaotong University;
  • 关键词:大豆 ; g10-epsps ; 转化效率 ; 抗性鉴定
  • 英文关键词:soybean;;g10-epsps;;transformation efficiency;;resistance identification
  • 中文刊名:SHNX
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Agricultural Science)
  • 机构:上海交通大学农业与生物学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-25
  • 出版单位:上海交通大学学报(农业科学版)
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.37;No.167
  • 基金:国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项(2014ZX08004001-004)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SHNX201903004
  • 页数:6
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:31-1837/S
  • 分类号:27-32
摘要
研究以皖豆28(WD28)为受体,采用农杆菌介导法,将抗草甘膦g10-epsps基因转入到大豆中,先后获得6株T_0代植株,转化效率为1.23%。对获得的转化体的下代进行PCR检测,均获得目的片段。同时取其根、茎、叶、花、荚、种子进行Western blot检测,均有外源蛋白表达。T_1代通过喷施田间推荐浓度的草甘膦进行抗性鉴定,统计抗性单株数,进行X~2分析,除转化体WD28-3外,其余5个后代的抗感分离比均符合3∶1的比例。
        In this study,six glyphosate resistant soybean plants(T_0 generation) were obtained through Agrobacterium mediated method.The efficiency of transformation was 1.23%.PCR and Western blot confirmed that the g10-epsps gene was intergrated into the soybean(Wandou 28) genome and expressed quite well in root,stem,leaf,flower,pod and seed.Resistance identification of T_1 plants was carried out by spraying glyphosate under the recommended concentration.The resistant to sensitive ratios of the plants derived from five T_0 plants,except WD28-3,all fit to 3∶1.
引文
[1] 赵团结,盖钧镒,李海旺,等.超高产大豆育种研究的进展与讨论[J].中国农业科学,2006,39(1):29-37.
    [2] 王宜林,李宏.抗除草剂转基因植物的研究现状[J].生物学通报,2005,40(11):15-17.
    [3] 邱丽娟,王昌陵,周国安,等.大豆分子育种研究进展[J].中国农业科学,2007,40:2418-2436.
    [4] Owens L D,Cress D E.Genotypic variability of soybean response to Agrobacterium strains harboring the Ti or Ri plasmids[J].Plant Physiology,1985,77(1):87-94.
    [5] McKenzie M,Cress W.The evaluation of South African cultivars of soybean for their susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefacious and the production of transgenic soybean[J].South African Journal of Science,1992,88(4):193-196.
    [6] Bailey M,Boerma H,Parrot W.Genotype effects on proliferative embryogenesis and plant regeneration of soybean[J].In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant,1993,29(3):102-108.
    [7] Droste A,Bodanese-Zanettini M,Mundstock E,et al.Susceptibility of Brazilian soybean cultivars to Agrobacterium tumefacious[J].Revista Brasileira de Genetica,1994,17(1):83-88
    [8] Mauro A,Pfeiffer T,Collins G.Inheritance of soybean susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefacious and its relationship to transformation[J].Crop Science,1995,35(4):1152-1156.
    [9] Dale P J,Clarke B,Fontes E M G.Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops[J].Nature Biotechnology,2002,20(6):567-574.
    [10] 钟金传,吴文良,夏友富,等.转基因大豆发展及中国大豆产业对策[J].中国农业大学学报,2005,10(4):43-50.
    [11] Beckie H J,Hall L M,Warwick S I.Impact of herbicide-resistant crops as weeds in Canada[C]//The BCPC Conference.Weeds.Brighton,UK:BCPC,2001:135-142.
    [12] DeCleene M,De Lay J.The host range of crown gall[J].The Botanical Review,1976,42(4):389-466.
    [13] Trick H N,Dinkins R D,Santarem E R,et al.Recent advances in soybean transformation[J].Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology,1997,24:39-26.
    [14] Barwale U,Kerns H,Widholm J.Plant regeneration from callus cultures of several soybean genotypes via embryogenesis and organogenesis[J].Planta,1986,167(4):473-481.
    [15] Hinchee M A W,Connor Ward D V,Newell C A.Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium mediated DNA transfer[J].Nature Biotechnology,1988,6:915-922.
    [16] Danaldson P A,Simmonds D H.Susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefacious and cotyledonary node transformation in short season soybean[J].Plant Cell Reports,2000,19:478-484.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700