不同营养液浓度对水培植物生长的影响
|
摘要
【目的】不同营养液浓度对水培植物生长的影响。【方法】在改良Hoagland营养液的基础上,配制营养液为100%、75%、50%、25%和0%的5个处理组,研究不同营养液浓度对水培火鹤(Anthurium scherzerianum Schott)和花叶万年青(Dieffenbachia picta Lodd.)生长指标以及水中氨氮和亚硝氮浓度的影响。【结果】不同营养液浓度对火鹤的株高、叶宽和根长,花叶万年青的叶宽均有显著影响,高浓度组生长较快。除0%组外,水培火鹤和花叶万年青的营养液中氨氮浓度均随时间增加而降低,亚硝氮浓度逐渐增加。火鹤对水中氨氮去除率显著高于花叶万年青。【结论】在低浓度培养液中火鹤的长势明显受到抑制,花叶万年青的长势并未受到较大影响,而火鹤比花叶万年青表现出更高的氨氮去除率。
【Objective】The effect of nutrient solution concentrations on the has an effect on the growth of hydroponic plants.【Methods】In this study,based on the Hoagland nutrient solution,the 100%,75%,50%,25%,and 0% concentrations were prepared,and then the effect on the growth indexes of Anthurium scherzerianum Schott and Dieffenbachia picta Lodd.,and contents of NH_3-N and NO_2-N were investigated.【Results】The results indicated that the concentrations of nutrient solution had significant effect on the plant height,leaf width and root length of A.scherzerianum,and leaf width of D.picta.The plants in the high concentration of nutrient solution grew faster than those in low concentration of nutrient solution.Except in 0% nutrient solution,the NH_3-N concentrations decreased along with the time in other nutrient solution of A.scherzerianum and D.picta,but the NO_2-N concentration increased gradually.The cutting rate of NH_3-N in the nutrient solution of A.scherzerianum was significantly higher than that of D.picta.【Conclusion】In low concentration of nutrient solution,the growth of A.scherzerianum was inhibited which had little influence on the growth of D.picta.A.scherzerianum had higher cutting rate of NH3-N than that of D.picta.
【Objective】The effect of nutrient solution concentrations on the has an effect on the growth of hydroponic plants.【Methods】In this study,based on the Hoagland nutrient solution,the 100%,75%,50%,25%,and 0% concentrations were prepared,and then the effect on the growth indexes of Anthurium scherzerianum Schott and Dieffenbachia picta Lodd.,and contents of NH_3-N and NO_2-N were investigated.【Results】The results indicated that the concentrations of nutrient solution had significant effect on the plant height,leaf width and root length of A.scherzerianum,and leaf width of D.picta.The plants in the high concentration of nutrient solution grew faster than those in low concentration of nutrient solution.Except in 0% nutrient solution,the NH_3-N concentrations decreased along with the time in other nutrient solution of A.scherzerianum and D.picta,but the NO_2-N concentration increased gradually.The cutting rate of NH_3-N in the nutrient solution of A.scherzerianum was significantly higher than that of D.picta.【Conclusion】In low concentration of nutrient solution,the growth of A.scherzerianum was inhibited which had little influence on the growth of D.picta.A.scherzerianum had higher cutting rate of NH3-N than that of D.picta.
引文
[1]孙英,崔金腾,徐曼,赵和文.不同营养液对火鹤幼苗与成苗生长的影响[J].北京农学院学报,2015,3(30):3-6
[2]李风童,陈秀兰,刘春贵,孙叶,马辉,张甜,包建忠.不同配方营养液对水培风信子生长及观赏品质的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(10):131-134
[3]杨少辉,季静,王罡.不同营养液对蝴蝶兰水培生长的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2008,31(6):30-33
[4]李瑞.不同营养液对水培吊兰生长的影响及应用[J].河南农业,2012,9(30):57-58
[5]何娜.水生植物修复氮、磷污染水体研究进展[J].环境污染与防治,2012,34(3):71-78
[6]何娜.不同水生植物去除水体氮磷的效果[J].环境工程学报,2013,7(4):1295-1300
[7]秦丽娟,方正,李英丽,赵斌.不同营养液对水培火鹤幼苗生长及相关生理指标的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2009(32):38-41
[8]杨明艳.三种观赏植物不同营养液配方和浓度水培效应[J].热带农业科技,2015,38(3):37-41
[9]王月英,郭秀珠,陈义增,徐剑东.生长调节物质及营养液对5种水培花卉的影响[J].浙江林学院学报,2006,23(2):232-235
[10]黄益鸿,周杰良,雷东阳.不同营养液对水培观赏植物的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2010,1(49):112-113
[11]何念祖,孟赐福.植物营养原理[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1987:59-124
[12]陈艳丽,高新生,李绍.NO3-N与NH+4-N配比对热带地区水培荆芥生长和品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2011,27(1):75-79
[13]张春兰,高祖明,张耀东,唐为民.氮素形态和NO3-N与NH+4-N配比对菠菜生长和品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,1990,13(3):70-74
[14]池田英勇.培养液中硝态氮和铵态氮浓度与比率对蔬菜生长、叶片中氮成分及培养液pH的影响[J].园艺学会杂志,1983,52(2):159-166
[15] Magalhaes JR,Huber DM.Response of ammonium assimilation enzymes to nitrogen form treatments in different plant species[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition,1991,14(2):175-185
[16]孙宏彦,杨帆,陶洪斌,游捷,林杉.氮素形态和营养液浓度对二色补血草生长的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2008,13(1):36-41
[17]王宪泽,程炳嵩,张国珍.氮素形态与作物生育的关系及其影响因子[J].山东农业大学学报,1990(1):93-98
[18] Hageman RH.氮素形态对植物生长的影响[J].植物营养生理进展,将福龙译.1985:53-63
[19]陈罡.水生植物净化水体作用的研究进展[J].吉林林业科技,2016,11(45):29-31
[20]郭鑫,张列宇,席北斗,刘云,李晓光.高氨氮浓度下湿地植物筛选及脱氮效果研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(5):993-1000
[21]彭忆兰,付美云,刘作云.三种水生植物对养殖废水中氨氮的净化效果[J].湖南农业科学,2016,55(16):4129-4132
[22]陈友媛,崔香,董滨,杨世迎,胡广鑫,李亚平.3种水培观赏植物净化模拟污水的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):253-257
[23]王艳英,王晓磊,王成,董建华,刘晓双,郜爱玲.基于净化城市河道功能的水培花卉的筛选研究[J].热带作物学报,2017,38(9):1595-1600
[24]丁爱芳,唐玉娣,刘爱芳,周佳玉.2种水生植物对富营养化水体的净化效果研究[J].南京晓庄学院学报,2017,11(6):67
[25]杜姗,孙玥,李锋民.人工水草对半咸水的水质净化效果及其机理[J].中国给水排水,2015,9(31):1-6
[26]王娟,王圣瑞,金相灿,张跃进,朱书全.沉水植物黑藻对沉积物氨氮吸附/释放特征的影响[J].生态环境,2017,16(2):336-341
[2]李风童,陈秀兰,刘春贵,孙叶,马辉,张甜,包建忠.不同配方营养液对水培风信子生长及观赏品质的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(10):131-134
[3]杨少辉,季静,王罡.不同营养液对蝴蝶兰水培生长的影响[J].河南农业大学学报,2008,31(6):30-33
[4]李瑞.不同营养液对水培吊兰生长的影响及应用[J].河南农业,2012,9(30):57-58
[5]何娜.水生植物修复氮、磷污染水体研究进展[J].环境污染与防治,2012,34(3):71-78
[6]何娜.不同水生植物去除水体氮磷的效果[J].环境工程学报,2013,7(4):1295-1300
[7]秦丽娟,方正,李英丽,赵斌.不同营养液对水培火鹤幼苗生长及相关生理指标的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2009(32):38-41
[8]杨明艳.三种观赏植物不同营养液配方和浓度水培效应[J].热带农业科技,2015,38(3):37-41
[9]王月英,郭秀珠,陈义增,徐剑东.生长调节物质及营养液对5种水培花卉的影响[J].浙江林学院学报,2006,23(2):232-235
[10]黄益鸿,周杰良,雷东阳.不同营养液对水培观赏植物的影响[J].湖北农业科学,2010,1(49):112-113
[11]何念祖,孟赐福.植物营养原理[M].上海:上海科技出版社,1987:59-124
[12]陈艳丽,高新生,李绍.NO3-N与NH+4-N配比对热带地区水培荆芥生长和品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2011,27(1):75-79
[13]张春兰,高祖明,张耀东,唐为民.氮素形态和NO3-N与NH+4-N配比对菠菜生长和品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,1990,13(3):70-74
[14]池田英勇.培养液中硝态氮和铵态氮浓度与比率对蔬菜生长、叶片中氮成分及培养液pH的影响[J].园艺学会杂志,1983,52(2):159-166
[15] Magalhaes JR,Huber DM.Response of ammonium assimilation enzymes to nitrogen form treatments in different plant species[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition,1991,14(2):175-185
[16]孙宏彦,杨帆,陶洪斌,游捷,林杉.氮素形态和营养液浓度对二色补血草生长的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2008,13(1):36-41
[17]王宪泽,程炳嵩,张国珍.氮素形态与作物生育的关系及其影响因子[J].山东农业大学学报,1990(1):93-98
[18] Hageman RH.氮素形态对植物生长的影响[J].植物营养生理进展,将福龙译.1985:53-63
[19]陈罡.水生植物净化水体作用的研究进展[J].吉林林业科技,2016,11(45):29-31
[20]郭鑫,张列宇,席北斗,刘云,李晓光.高氨氮浓度下湿地植物筛选及脱氮效果研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(5):993-1000
[21]彭忆兰,付美云,刘作云.三种水生植物对养殖废水中氨氮的净化效果[J].湖南农业科学,2016,55(16):4129-4132
[22]陈友媛,崔香,董滨,杨世迎,胡广鑫,李亚平.3种水培观赏植物净化模拟污水的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(2):253-257
[23]王艳英,王晓磊,王成,董建华,刘晓双,郜爱玲.基于净化城市河道功能的水培花卉的筛选研究[J].热带作物学报,2017,38(9):1595-1600
[24]丁爱芳,唐玉娣,刘爱芳,周佳玉.2种水生植物对富营养化水体的净化效果研究[J].南京晓庄学院学报,2017,11(6):67
[25]杜姗,孙玥,李锋民.人工水草对半咸水的水质净化效果及其机理[J].中国给水排水,2015,9(31):1-6
[26]王娟,王圣瑞,金相灿,张跃进,朱书全.沉水植物黑藻对沉积物氨氮吸附/释放特征的影响[J].生态环境,2017,16(2):336-341