京津冀区域大气污染协同治理的困境及路径选择
|
摘要
在京津冀协同发展战略深入实施的大背景下,京津冀区域大气污染治理体制、机制和政策工具层面所暴露的问题,亟需掌握着区域内主要资源和权力的政府组织调整策略,突破体制机制障碍束缚,协同治理区域公共问题。从政府层面破题,以大气污染问题最为突出的京津冀区域为例,基于协同治理的理论框架,在系统分析区域大气污染治理现实困境的基础上,提出了京津冀区域大气污染协同治理的路径:在体制层面,实现由"属地管理"到"区域协同治理"的转变;在机制层面,实现由"运动式"协同治理到"常态化"协同治理的转变;在政策工具层面,实现由"单一型"工具到"复合型"政策工具的转变。
With the collaborative development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region deepened,difficulties from the institution of,the mechanism for,and the policy tool for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional air pollution urge related governmental organizations responsible for main resources and power to adjust strategies,to clear institutional and mechanic blocks,and so to deal with public issues in a collaborative way. By this regard,from the perspective of government and with the example of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional air pollution that is the most critical in China,this paper will introduce three paths to collaborative governance of the given example based on the theoretical framework of collaborative governance. On the institution,the path can be the transition from localized management to regional collaborative governance. As for the mechanism,the path can be the transition from a campaign-style to a normalized collaborative governance. Besides,the transition from being simple to comprehensiveness in the policy tool should also be realized.
With the collaborative development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region deepened,difficulties from the institution of,the mechanism for,and the policy tool for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional air pollution urge related governmental organizations responsible for main resources and power to adjust strategies,to clear institutional and mechanic blocks,and so to deal with public issues in a collaborative way. By this regard,from the perspective of government and with the example of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei regional air pollution that is the most critical in China,this paper will introduce three paths to collaborative governance of the given example based on the theoretical framework of collaborative governance. On the institution,the path can be the transition from localized management to regional collaborative governance. As for the mechanism,the path can be the transition from a campaign-style to a normalized collaborative governance. Besides,the transition from being simple to comprehensiveness in the policy tool should also be realized.
引文
[1]陶希东.美国空气污染跨界治理的特区制度及经验[J].环境保护,2012(7):75-78.
[2] Chris Ansell and Alison Gash. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008(4):543-571.
[3]杨志军.三观政治与合法性基础:一项关于运动式治理的思维框架解释[J].浙江社会科学,2016(11):28-38+156-157.
[4]徐小娟,刘子锐,高文康等.后奥运时期京津冀区域大气本底夏季污染变化[J].环境科学研究,2012(09):959-967.
[5]詹姆斯·R·汤森,布兰特利·沃马克.中国政治[M].顾速,董方,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,1995:283.
[6]蒋敏娟.中国政府跨部门协同机制研究[D].北京大学,2013.
[7]魏娜.京津冀大气污染跨域协同治理研究[D].北京大学,2016.
[8]赵新峰,袁宗威.区域大气污染治理中的政策工具:我国的实践历程与优化选择[J].中国行政管理,2016(7):107-114.
[9]刘伟忠.我国协同治理理论研究的现状与趋向[J].城市问题,2012(5):81-85.
[10]荣敬本等.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998:7.
[11]毛万磊.环境治理的政策工具研究:分类、特性与选择[J].山东行政学院学报,2014(4):23-28.
[2] Chris Ansell and Alison Gash. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2008(4):543-571.
[3]杨志军.三观政治与合法性基础:一项关于运动式治理的思维框架解释[J].浙江社会科学,2016(11):28-38+156-157.
[4]徐小娟,刘子锐,高文康等.后奥运时期京津冀区域大气本底夏季污染变化[J].环境科学研究,2012(09):959-967.
[5]詹姆斯·R·汤森,布兰特利·沃马克.中国政治[M].顾速,董方,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,1995:283.
[6]蒋敏娟.中国政府跨部门协同机制研究[D].北京大学,2013.
[7]魏娜.京津冀大气污染跨域协同治理研究[D].北京大学,2016.
[8]赵新峰,袁宗威.区域大气污染治理中的政策工具:我国的实践历程与优化选择[J].中国行政管理,2016(7):107-114.
[9]刘伟忠.我国协同治理理论研究的现状与趋向[J].城市问题,2012(5):81-85.
[10]荣敬本等.从压力型体制向民主合作体制的转变[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1998:7.
[11]毛万磊.环境治理的政策工具研究:分类、特性与选择[J].山东行政学院学报,2014(4):23-28.