福建省莆田城区地下水质量现势性分析评价
|
摘要
在分析莆田城区的水文地质特征基础上,进行水文地质单元划分.采用模糊综合评价法,分析评价了地下水质量现势及分布特征.综合分析认为:莆田城区浅层地下水质量总体较差,基本上与该区域地下水实际状况相符;分布特征为木兰溪下游及入海口地下水质量极差,沿海岸线及木兰溪中游两岸地下较差,远离海岸线或往山丘地带水质逐渐往较好—良好趋势展布.
Based on the analysis of the hydrogeological characteristics of the urban area of Putian City,the division of hydrogeological units was conducted. The current situation and distribution characteristics of groundwater quality were analyzed by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The result indicates that the Putian City groundwater quality is generally poor,which is basically consistent with the actual situation of local groundwater. The distribution characteristics of groundwater quality for Mulan River downstream and corresponding estuary are extremely poor,while along the coastline and midstream of Mulan River are very poor,but for far away from the coast line or mountain areas gradually become well.
Based on the analysis of the hydrogeological characteristics of the urban area of Putian City,the division of hydrogeological units was conducted. The current situation and distribution characteristics of groundwater quality were analyzed by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The result indicates that the Putian City groundwater quality is generally poor,which is basically consistent with the actual situation of local groundwater. The distribution characteristics of groundwater quality for Mulan River downstream and corresponding estuary are extremely poor,while along the coastline and midstream of Mulan River are very poor,but for far away from the coast line or mountain areas gradually become well.
引文
[1]胡四一.中国水资源公报(2012)[R].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[2]唐克旺,王研.我国城市供水水源地水质状况分析[J].水资源保护,2001,17(2):30-31.
[3]刘辉,卓海华,刘云兵,等.我国水资源保护监测规划编制的内容和方法[J].水资源保护,2015,31(1):106-109.
[4]唐克旺,吕铁峰.关于城市饮用水水源地风险管理的思考[J].水资源保护,2015,31(2):95-98.
[5]詹永东.莆田市农村饮用水安全状况与保障措施研究[J].农业环境与发展,2006,23(4):71-73.
[6]唐克旺,朱党生,唐蕴,等.中国城市地下水饮用水源地水质状况评价[J].水资源保护,2009,25(1):1-4.
[7]刘月,于翠松,曹升乐,等.东阿地下水源地水质综合评价方法研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015,25(4):99-103.
[8]孟珍珠,唐德善,魏宇航,等.基于海明贴近度的地下水水质熵权模糊物元评价模型[J].四川环境,2015,34(3):117-121.
[9]陈继光.灰关联决策在水质面板数据处理中的扩展及应用[J].节水灌溉,2015(4):63-65.
[10]兰兆青.Hopfield网络在水质综合评价中的应用[J].山西农业学报,2013,33(2):182-184.
[11]陈文林,刘鑫尧,许光泉,等.福建省地下水环境状况调查与评价[R].泉州:福建省197地质大队,2015.
[12]Zadeh L A.Fuzzy Sets[J].Information and Control,1965(8):338-358.
[13]Zadeh L A.Similarity relation and fuzzy orderings[J].Information Sciences,1971(3):177-200.
[14]张新钰,辛宝东,刘文臣,等.三种地下水水质评价方法的应用对比分析[J].城市地质,2011,6(1):30-36.
[15]于伟伟,邢立亭,马振民,等.模糊评判在地下水质量评价中的应用[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,23(1):87-89.
[2]唐克旺,王研.我国城市供水水源地水质状况分析[J].水资源保护,2001,17(2):30-31.
[3]刘辉,卓海华,刘云兵,等.我国水资源保护监测规划编制的内容和方法[J].水资源保护,2015,31(1):106-109.
[4]唐克旺,吕铁峰.关于城市饮用水水源地风险管理的思考[J].水资源保护,2015,31(2):95-98.
[5]詹永东.莆田市农村饮用水安全状况与保障措施研究[J].农业环境与发展,2006,23(4):71-73.
[6]唐克旺,朱党生,唐蕴,等.中国城市地下水饮用水源地水质状况评价[J].水资源保护,2009,25(1):1-4.
[7]刘月,于翠松,曹升乐,等.东阿地下水源地水质综合评价方法研究[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015,25(4):99-103.
[8]孟珍珠,唐德善,魏宇航,等.基于海明贴近度的地下水水质熵权模糊物元评价模型[J].四川环境,2015,34(3):117-121.
[9]陈继光.灰关联决策在水质面板数据处理中的扩展及应用[J].节水灌溉,2015(4):63-65.
[10]兰兆青.Hopfield网络在水质综合评价中的应用[J].山西农业学报,2013,33(2):182-184.
[11]陈文林,刘鑫尧,许光泉,等.福建省地下水环境状况调查与评价[R].泉州:福建省197地质大队,2015.
[12]Zadeh L A.Fuzzy Sets[J].Information and Control,1965(8):338-358.
[13]Zadeh L A.Similarity relation and fuzzy orderings[J].Information Sciences,1971(3):177-200.
[14]张新钰,辛宝东,刘文臣,等.三种地下水水质评价方法的应用对比分析[J].城市地质,2011,6(1):30-36.
[15]于伟伟,邢立亭,马振民,等.模糊评判在地下水质量评价中的应用[J].济南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,23(1):87-89.