生产性服务业FDI对我国制造业效率的影响——基于交通基础设施水平的门槛效应
|
摘要
生产性服务业FDI对制造业效率具有一定的促进作用,但二者的关系受到一系列东道国区域发展因素的影响。从区域交通发展水平对二者关系的影响视角出发,利用2006～2015年中国21个省级单位的面板数据对交通基础设施水平的门槛效应进行实证检验,结果表明:生产性服务业FDI对制造业效率的影响作用因区域交通基础设施水平的不同而呈现出差异的区间效应,表现为交通基础设施水平较低时,生产性服务业FDI对制造业效率的促进作用相对较弱;当交通基础设施水平突破门槛值后,生产性服务业FDI对制造业效率的促进作用显著变强。此外,考虑到区域差异性后发现,各地区交通基础设施水平对二者关系的影响强度具有明显差异,西部地区通过改善交通基础设施水平从而提升二者正向关系的幅度最大,中部地区最小,东部地区居中。
Productive service industry FDI can improve manufacturing efficiency to some extent,but the relationship between them is influenced by a series of regional development factors of the host country. From the perspective of the impact of regional transportation development level on the relationship between productive service industry FDI and manufacturing efficiency,an empirical study is conducted in this paper to test the threshold effect of the transportation infrastructure level based on the panel data of 21 provincial-level units in China from2006 to 2015. The result indicates that the impact of FDI on the efficiency of manufacturing services varies due to the different levels of regional transportation infrastructure,and the internal effect arises. The productive service industry FDI has a relatively weak effect on manufacturing efficiency when the level of transportation infrastructure is low. When the level of transportation infrastructure exceeds the threshold,the productive service industry FDI has a more significant effect on manufacturing efficiency. In addition,when the regional difference is taken into consideration,it is found that the impact of the level of transportation infrastructure in each region on the relationship between them has significant differences. In the western region,the positive relationship is promoted to the maximum by improving the level of transportation infrastructure. The positive relationship is to the minimum in the central region. The positive relationship in the eastern region is at an intermediate level.
Productive service industry FDI can improve manufacturing efficiency to some extent,but the relationship between them is influenced by a series of regional development factors of the host country. From the perspective of the impact of regional transportation development level on the relationship between productive service industry FDI and manufacturing efficiency,an empirical study is conducted in this paper to test the threshold effect of the transportation infrastructure level based on the panel data of 21 provincial-level units in China from2006 to 2015. The result indicates that the impact of FDI on the efficiency of manufacturing services varies due to the different levels of regional transportation infrastructure,and the internal effect arises. The productive service industry FDI has a relatively weak effect on manufacturing efficiency when the level of transportation infrastructure is low. When the level of transportation infrastructure exceeds the threshold,the productive service industry FDI has a more significant effect on manufacturing efficiency. In addition,when the regional difference is taken into consideration,it is found that the impact of the level of transportation infrastructure in each region on the relationship between them has significant differences. In the western region,the positive relationship is promoted to the maximum by improving the level of transportation infrastructure. The positive relationship is to the minimum in the central region. The positive relationship in the eastern region is at an intermediate level.
引文
[1]涂涛涛,余道先.外商直接投资行业间溢出及相关影响因素分析[J].珞珈管理评论,2010,(2):188-197.
[2]邢彦,张慧颖.生产性服务业FDI与制造业出口技术进步——基于知识产权保护的门槛效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(8):29-45.
[3]Javorcik B S,Li Y. Do the Biggest Aisles Serve Brighter Future? Implications of Global Retail Chains'Presence for Romania[R]. World Bank Working Paper,2008:4650.
[4]韩德超.生产性服务业FDI对工业企业效率影响研究[J].统计研究,2011,28(2):65-70.
[5]杨柳勇,沈国良.外商直接投资对国内投资的挤入挤出效应分析[J].统计研究,2002,19(3):6-8.
[6]Cowan R,Soete L,Chervonnaya O. Knowledge Transfer and the Services Sector in the Context of the New Economy[Z].MERIT-Infonomics Research Memoran-dum Series,2001.
[7]江静,刘志彪,于明超.生产者服务业发展与制造业效率提升:基于地区和行业面板数据的经验分析[J].世界经济,2007,30(8):52-62.
[8]江小涓.中国吸收外资30年:利用全球资源促进增长与升级[J].经济与管理研究,2008,(12):5-11.
[9]Kugler M. Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment:Within or Between Industries?[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2006,80(2):444-477.
[10]Haddad M,Harrison A. Are There Positive Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Panel Data for Morocco[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1993,42(1):51-74.
[11]Grünfeld L A. Multinational Production,Absorptive Capacity,and Endogen-ous R&D Spillovers[J]. Review of International Economics,2006,14(5):922-940.
[12]Havranek T,Irsova Z. Estimating Vertical Spillovers from FDI:Why Results Vary and What the True Effect Is[J]. Journal of International Economics,2011,85(2):234-244.
[13]Meyer K E,Sinani E. When and Where Does Foreign Direct Investment Generate Positive Spillovers? A Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(7):1075-1094.
[14]刘志彪.全球化背景下中国制造业升级的路径与品牌战略[J].财经问题研究,2005,(5):25-31.
[15]Bessant J,Rush H. Building Bridges for Innovation:the Role of Consultants in Technology Transfer[J]. Research policy,1995,24(1):97-114.
[16]金江,李郸.交通基础设施投资与经济发展——基于广东省的空间计量研究[J].财政研究,2012,(6):55-59.
[17]Balasubramanyam V N,Salisu M,Sapsford D. Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in EP and IS Countries[J]. The Economic Journal,1996,106:92-105.
[18]Olofsdotter K. Foreign Direct Investment,Country Capabilities and Economic Growth[J]. Weltwirts-chaftliches Archiv,1998,134(3):534-547.
[19]何洁.外国直接投资对中国工业部门外溢效应的进一步精确量化[J].世界经济,2000,23(12):29-36.
[20]刘秉镰,武鹏,刘玉海.交通基础设施与中国全要素生产率增长——基于省域数据的空间面板计量分析[J].中国工业经济,2010,(3):54-64.
[21]程惠芳,陆嘉俊.知识资本对工业企业全要素生产率影响的实证分析[J].经济研究,2014,49(5):174-187.
[22]冯泰文.生产性服务业的发展对制造业效率的影响——以交易成本和制造成本为中介变量[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,(3):56-65.
[23]Wheeler D,Mody A. International Investment Location Decisions:The Case of U. S. Firms[J]. Journal of International Economics,1992,33:57-76.
[24]张公嵬,陈翔,李赞. FDI、产业集聚与全要素生产率增长——基于制造业行业的实证分析[J].科研管理,2013,34(9):114-122.
[25]张振刚,陈志明,胡琪玲.生产性服务业对制造业效率提升的影响研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(1):131-138.
[26]陈涛涛.影响中国外商直接投资溢出效应的行业特征[J].中国社会科学,2003,(4):33-43.
(1)考虑到区域差异可能对结果造成的影响,本文将全国样本分为东部、中部与西部三大经济地区,分别考察不同地区交通基础设施水平对生产性服务业FDI影响制造业效率的门槛效应。由于部分省份数据缺失,因此剔除了数据缺失省份的数据。其中,东部地区包括北京、天津、河北、辽宁、江苏、浙江、山东、广东8个省级单位;中部地区包括黑龙江、安徽、江西、河南、湖北5个省级单位;西部地区包括广西、内蒙古、重庆、贵州、云南、陕西、甘肃、新疆8个省级单位。
[2]邢彦,张慧颖.生产性服务业FDI与制造业出口技术进步——基于知识产权保护的门槛效应[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(8):29-45.
[3]Javorcik B S,Li Y. Do the Biggest Aisles Serve Brighter Future? Implications of Global Retail Chains'Presence for Romania[R]. World Bank Working Paper,2008:4650.
[4]韩德超.生产性服务业FDI对工业企业效率影响研究[J].统计研究,2011,28(2):65-70.
[5]杨柳勇,沈国良.外商直接投资对国内投资的挤入挤出效应分析[J].统计研究,2002,19(3):6-8.
[6]Cowan R,Soete L,Chervonnaya O. Knowledge Transfer and the Services Sector in the Context of the New Economy[Z].MERIT-Infonomics Research Memoran-dum Series,2001.
[7]江静,刘志彪,于明超.生产者服务业发展与制造业效率提升:基于地区和行业面板数据的经验分析[J].世界经济,2007,30(8):52-62.
[8]江小涓.中国吸收外资30年:利用全球资源促进增长与升级[J].经济与管理研究,2008,(12):5-11.
[9]Kugler M. Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment:Within or Between Industries?[J]. Journal of Development Economics,2006,80(2):444-477.
[10]Haddad M,Harrison A. Are There Positive Spillovers from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Panel Data for Morocco[J]. Journal of Development Economics,1993,42(1):51-74.
[11]Grünfeld L A. Multinational Production,Absorptive Capacity,and Endogen-ous R&D Spillovers[J]. Review of International Economics,2006,14(5):922-940.
[12]Havranek T,Irsova Z. Estimating Vertical Spillovers from FDI:Why Results Vary and What the True Effect Is[J]. Journal of International Economics,2011,85(2):234-244.
[13]Meyer K E,Sinani E. When and Where Does Foreign Direct Investment Generate Positive Spillovers? A Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2009,40(7):1075-1094.
[14]刘志彪.全球化背景下中国制造业升级的路径与品牌战略[J].财经问题研究,2005,(5):25-31.
[15]Bessant J,Rush H. Building Bridges for Innovation:the Role of Consultants in Technology Transfer[J]. Research policy,1995,24(1):97-114.
[16]金江,李郸.交通基础设施投资与经济发展——基于广东省的空间计量研究[J].财政研究,2012,(6):55-59.
[17]Balasubramanyam V N,Salisu M,Sapsford D. Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in EP and IS Countries[J]. The Economic Journal,1996,106:92-105.
[18]Olofsdotter K. Foreign Direct Investment,Country Capabilities and Economic Growth[J]. Weltwirts-chaftliches Archiv,1998,134(3):534-547.
[19]何洁.外国直接投资对中国工业部门外溢效应的进一步精确量化[J].世界经济,2000,23(12):29-36.
[20]刘秉镰,武鹏,刘玉海.交通基础设施与中国全要素生产率增长——基于省域数据的空间面板计量分析[J].中国工业经济,2010,(3):54-64.
[21]程惠芳,陆嘉俊.知识资本对工业企业全要素生产率影响的实证分析[J].经济研究,2014,49(5):174-187.
[22]冯泰文.生产性服务业的发展对制造业效率的影响——以交易成本和制造成本为中介变量[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2009,(3):56-65.
[23]Wheeler D,Mody A. International Investment Location Decisions:The Case of U. S. Firms[J]. Journal of International Economics,1992,33:57-76.
[24]张公嵬,陈翔,李赞. FDI、产业集聚与全要素生产率增长——基于制造业行业的实证分析[J].科研管理,2013,34(9):114-122.
[25]张振刚,陈志明,胡琪玲.生产性服务业对制造业效率提升的影响研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(1):131-138.
[26]陈涛涛.影响中国外商直接投资溢出效应的行业特征[J].中国社会科学,2003,(4):33-43.
(1)考虑到区域差异可能对结果造成的影响,本文将全国样本分为东部、中部与西部三大经济地区,分别考察不同地区交通基础设施水平对生产性服务业FDI影响制造业效率的门槛效应。由于部分省份数据缺失,因此剔除了数据缺失省份的数据。其中,东部地区包括北京、天津、河北、辽宁、江苏、浙江、山东、广东8个省级单位;中部地区包括黑龙江、安徽、江西、河南、湖北5个省级单位;西部地区包括广西、内蒙古、重庆、贵州、云南、陕西、甘肃、新疆8个省级单位。