就业保护制度的权利基础分析——兼论我国劳动力市场制度建设的走向
|
摘要
劳动者具有经济和社会二重属性,这决定着劳动者一方面作为劳动力的所有者而存在,另一方面作为社会成员而存在。就业保护制度的设立是劳动者经济权利与社会权利冲突的结果,意味着劳动力市场建设的目标是追求效率与平等、灵活性与安全性之间的某种平衡。劳动力市场的改革与完善必须建立在维护劳动者经济权益的基础上,最低程度地降低就业保护带来的负面效应。
Workers have economic and social attributes,which determine workers as labor force owners and society members. The establishment of employment protection institution is the result of conflict between labor economic rights and social rights,which means the construction of labor market is the maintenance of a balance between efficiency and equality,flexibility and security. The reform and improvement of the labor market must aim to protect the economic rights and interests of laborers and reduce the negative impact brought on by the employment protection.
Workers have economic and social attributes,which determine workers as labor force owners and society members. The establishment of employment protection institution is the result of conflict between labor economic rights and social rights,which means the construction of labor market is the maintenance of a balance between efficiency and equality,flexibility and security. The reform and improvement of the labor market must aim to protect the economic rights and interests of laborers and reduce the negative impact brought on by the employment protection.
引文
[1]资本论:第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.
[2]范海昌,孔德威,郑立.欧洲大陆国家保守主义就业政策分析[J].河北师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2010(1):47.
[3]孔德威.劳动就业政策的国际比较研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2007:1.
[4]孙乐.增强我国劳动力市场的灵活性研究[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2010:7.
[5]苏振华,蔡旭昶.劳动者的选择空间和劳动者地位[J].社会科学战线,2011(3):54-58.
[6]布坎南.民主的限度[C]//查尔斯·K·罗利.财产权与民主的限度.刘晓峰,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:24-76.
[7]阿尔伯特·O·赫希曼.退出、呼吁与忠诚——对企业、组织和国家衰退的回应[M].卢昌崇,译.北京:经济科学出版社,2001.
[8]阿玛蒂亚·森.以自由看待发展[M].任赜,于真,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[9]European Expert Group on Flexicurity.Flexicurity pathways:Turning hurdles into stepping stones[R].2007.
[10]Clasen J,Clegg D.Unemployment protection and labour market reform in France and Great Britain in 1990s:Solidarity versus activation[J].Journal of Social Policy,2003,32(3):361-381.
[11]方浩.灵活性与安全性的两难抉择——OECD国家就业保护制度改革及其启示[J].人口与经济,2013(1):85-93.
[12]方浩.就业保护与劳动力市场绩效——基于跨国面板数据的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2012(9):40-48.
[13]姚先国.权利的界限[J].经济学动态,2011(3):37-39.
①转引自孔德威:《劳动就业政策的国际比较研究》.东北师范大学博士研究生论文,2007年第51页。
[2]范海昌,孔德威,郑立.欧洲大陆国家保守主义就业政策分析[J].河北师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2010(1):47.
[3]孔德威.劳动就业政策的国际比较研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2007:1.
[4]孙乐.增强我国劳动力市场的灵活性研究[D].北京:首都经济贸易大学,2010:7.
[5]苏振华,蔡旭昶.劳动者的选择空间和劳动者地位[J].社会科学战线,2011(3):54-58.
[6]布坎南.民主的限度[C]//查尔斯·K·罗利.财产权与民主的限度.刘晓峰,译.北京:商务印书馆,2007:24-76.
[7]阿尔伯特·O·赫希曼.退出、呼吁与忠诚——对企业、组织和国家衰退的回应[M].卢昌崇,译.北京:经济科学出版社,2001.
[8]阿玛蒂亚·森.以自由看待发展[M].任赜,于真,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2002.
[9]European Expert Group on Flexicurity.Flexicurity pathways:Turning hurdles into stepping stones[R].2007.
[10]Clasen J,Clegg D.Unemployment protection and labour market reform in France and Great Britain in 1990s:Solidarity versus activation[J].Journal of Social Policy,2003,32(3):361-381.
[11]方浩.灵活性与安全性的两难抉择——OECD国家就业保护制度改革及其启示[J].人口与经济,2013(1):85-93.
[12]方浩.就业保护与劳动力市场绩效——基于跨国面板数据的实证分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2012(9):40-48.
[13]姚先国.权利的界限[J].经济学动态,2011(3):37-39.
①转引自孔德威:《劳动就业政策的国际比较研究》.东北师范大学博士研究生论文,2007年第51页。