基于体系重心算法的火力打击目标排序方法
|
摘要
体系破击战法是联合火力打击中的主要战法。针对战法中确定核心目标困难的问题,提出一种基于超网络构架分析的体系重心算法。该方法引入理想目标清单补充目标打击清单中遗漏的体系目标,区分层次构建包含多个子网络的超网络,在超网络中找到支撑网络架构的体系重心节点,进而确定火力打击目标排序,并通过蒙特卡罗仿真实验形成目标排序的统计分析结果。仿真结果表明:该方法能够快速构建超网络,并在网络中准确定位体系重心节点,相比于传统的重要程度排序法更能体现体系破击战法效果。
Aiming at solving the problems about making key targets difficult at joint firepower for using system paralysis methods,it proposes a system gravity algorithm based on supernetwork structure analysis. The new method designs ideal target list to supply targets of the target strike list,and builds multi-level supernetwork to contain subnets for analyzing and finding the system gravity node. Finally,using system gravity nodes and Monte Carlo simulation to generate the target sequence. The simulations reveal that system gravity algorithm can build supernetwork efficiently and position system gravity nodes. Compared with important target choice method,this method has obvious advantages in combat system paralysis.
Aiming at solving the problems about making key targets difficult at joint firepower for using system paralysis methods,it proposes a system gravity algorithm based on supernetwork structure analysis. The new method designs ideal target list to supply targets of the target strike list,and builds multi-level supernetwork to contain subnets for analyzing and finding the system gravity node. Finally,using system gravity nodes and Monte Carlo simulation to generate the target sequence. The simulations reveal that system gravity algorithm can build supernetwork efficiently and position system gravity nodes. Compared with important target choice method,this method has obvious advantages in combat system paralysis.
引文
[1]Peter H.Potential system vulnerabilities of a network enabled force[C].USA:9th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium,2004:1-28.
[2]吴坤鸿,何明.基于DEA-TOPSIS的联合火力打击目标选择方法[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2015,29(1):25-29.
[3]孙智华,沈佳.基于改进AHP的电子战目标价值评估方法研究[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2012,35(5):75-78.
[4]朱晓亮,蔡群,周明亮.基于模糊聚类分析的电子目标排序[J].电子侦察干扰,2012,33(1):23-26.
[5]王耀辉,刘杰,陈志刚.基于模糊决策的炮兵火力打击目标价值研究[J].舰船电子工程,2012,32(1):19-21.
[6]章水林,肖利辉.基于多属性系统结构模型的火力打击方案评估[J].舰船电子工程,2014,34(9):32-34.
[7]刘柱.基于证据理论的陆战场目标价值分析与排序研究[J].舰船电子工程,2014,33(1):45-48.
[8]王长春,陈俊良,陈超.基于复杂网络作战体系破击的建模与仿真[J].系统仿真学报,2012,24(7):1491-1495.
[9]叶飞.基于熵法的模糊聚类目标排序方法研究[J].舰船电子工程,2011,31(8):60-62.
[10]Sheffi Y.Urban Transportation Network:Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods[M].New Jersey:Prentice-Hall,1985:261-347.
[2]吴坤鸿,何明.基于DEA-TOPSIS的联合火力打击目标选择方法[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2015,29(1):25-29.
[3]孙智华,沈佳.基于改进AHP的电子战目标价值评估方法研究[J].军事运筹与系统工程,2012,35(5):75-78.
[4]朱晓亮,蔡群,周明亮.基于模糊聚类分析的电子目标排序[J].电子侦察干扰,2012,33(1):23-26.
[5]王耀辉,刘杰,陈志刚.基于模糊决策的炮兵火力打击目标价值研究[J].舰船电子工程,2012,32(1):19-21.
[6]章水林,肖利辉.基于多属性系统结构模型的火力打击方案评估[J].舰船电子工程,2014,34(9):32-34.
[7]刘柱.基于证据理论的陆战场目标价值分析与排序研究[J].舰船电子工程,2014,33(1):45-48.
[8]王长春,陈俊良,陈超.基于复杂网络作战体系破击的建模与仿真[J].系统仿真学报,2012,24(7):1491-1495.
[9]叶飞.基于熵法的模糊聚类目标排序方法研究[J].舰船电子工程,2011,31(8):60-62.
[10]Sheffi Y.Urban Transportation Network:Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods[M].New Jersey:Prentice-Hall,1985:261-347.