中文版肿瘤患者食欲症状问卷信度、效度分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Reliability and Validity Research of Chinese Version of Cancer Appetite and Symptom Questionnaire
  • 作者:赵晓鹏 ; 闫超 ; 杜红珍 ; 谢颖 ; 骆彬 ; 李增宁
  • 英文作者:ZHAO Xiaopeng;YAN Chao;DU Hongzhen;XIE Ying;LUO Bin;LI Zengning;Department of Clinical Nutrition, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University;
  • 关键词:肿瘤患者 ; 食欲评价 ; 问卷 ; 信度 ; 效度
  • 英文关键词:Cancer patient;;Appetite evaluation;;Questionnaire;;Reliability;;Validity
  • 中文刊名:ZLFY
  • 英文刊名:Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment
  • 机构:河北医科大学第一医院临床营养科;
  • 出版日期:2018-09-30 09:55
  • 出版单位:肿瘤防治研究
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.45
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81373046)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZLFY201811010
  • 页数:5
  • CN:11
  • ISSN:42-1241/R
  • 分类号:60-64
摘要
目的对中文版肿瘤患者食欲症状问卷(CASQ)的信度和效度进行研究。方法翻译、回译形成CASQ中文问卷,对88例肿瘤患者使用CASQ进行问卷调查,并对中文版CASQ进行条目区分度检验,同时采用PG-SGA评估纳入研究对象的营养风险,将PG-SGA与CASQ比较并进行效度检验。在第一次测量之后,间隔7天进行第二次测量,并同时对前后两次的CASQ进行信度研究。结果 CASQ各条目得分与问卷总分的相关系数在0.242~0.653之间,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),重测信度系数结果表明数据行为良好,分半信度结果为0.560,内部一致性信度系数为0.436,中文版CASQ总分与PG-SGA总分的rs值为-0.475。结论中文版的肿瘤患者食欲症状问卷具有较好的信度和效度。
        Objective To investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of cancer appetite and symptom questionnaire(CASQ). Methods CASQ Chinese questionnaire was formed using translation and back-translation, and performed on 88 cancer patients. The entry distinction of the Chinese version of CASQ was tested. Simultaneously, PG-SGA was used to assess nutritional risks of the subjects; and it was compared with CASQ as well as the validity was tested. After the first measurement, the second measurement was made 7 days later; the reliability study of both CASQ was conducted. Results The correlation coefficient between each entry score of CASQ and the total score of the questionnaire was 0.242-0.653(P<0.05). The result of re-test reliability coefficient showed the data were good, the result of half-reliability was 0.560, internal consistency reliability coefficient was 0.436, and the rs value of the Chinese version of CASQ total score and the PG-SGA total score was-0.475. Conclusion The Chinese version of CASQ is tested to be with good reliability and validity.
引文
[1]Childs DS,Jatoi A.A hunger for hunger:a review of palliative therapies for cancer-associated anorexia[J].Ann Palliat Med,2018,pii:apm.
    [2]杜红珍,魏雨佳,张玲玲,等.肿瘤患者食欲的评价及药物干预[J].肿瘤代谢与营养电子杂志,2017,4(1):120-4.[Du HZ,Wei YJ,Zhang LL,et al.Cancer patients appetite status evaluation and drug intervention[J].Zhong Liu Dai Xie Yu Ying Yang Dian Zi Za Zhi,2017,4(1):120-4.]
    [3]Halliday V,Porock D,Arthur A,et al.Development and testing of a cancer appetite and symptom questionnaire[J].J Hum Nutr Diet,2012,25(3):217-24.
    [4]Brislin R.Back-translation for cross-culture research[J].J Cross Cult Psychol,1970,1(3):185-216.
    [5]一帆.项目的区分度[J].教育测量与评价(理论版),2010,3(2):36.[Yi F.The differentiation of project[J].Jiao Yu Ce Liang Yu Ping Jia(Li Lun Ban),2010,3(2):36.]
    [6]闻浩,陆梦洁,刘玉秀,等.定量测量Bland-Altman一致性评价方法研究及临床应用[J].医学研究生学报,2015,28(10):1107-11.[Wen H,Lu MJ,Liu YX,et al.Study on the Method of BlandAltman Conformance Assessment for Quantitative Measurement and Its Clinical Application[J].Yi Xue Yan Jiu Sheng Xue Bao,2015,28(10):1107-11.]
    [7]郭秀花.实用医学调查分析技术[M].第2版.北京:人民军医出版社,2014:261-79.[Guo XH.Practical medical investigation and analysis technology[M].2nd.Beijing:People's Military Medical Press,2014:261-79.]
    [8]赵斐然,周天驰,张俊颖,等.量表(问卷)信度、效度评价在我国医学领域的应用与展望[J].中华中医药杂志,2014,29(7):2280-3.[Zhao FR,Zhou TC,Zhang JY,et al.Prospect and application of evaluation about reliability and validity assessment on scale or questionnaire applied in the medical domain[J].Zhonghua Zhong Yi Yao Za Zhi,2014,29(7):2280-3.]
    [9]蒋小花,沈卓之,张楠楠,等.问卷的信度和效度分析[J].现代预防医学,2010,37(3):429-31.[Jiang XH,Shen ZZ,Zhang NN,et al.Reliability and validity analysis of the questionnaire[J].Xian Dai Yu Fang Yi Xue,2010,37(3):429-31.]
    [10]Wilson MM,Thomas DR,Rubenstein LZ,et al.Appetite assessment:simple appetite questionnaire predicts weight loss in community-dwelling adults and nursing home residents[J].Am JClin Nutr,2005,82(5):1074-81.
    [11]Spexoto MC,Serrano SV,Halliday V,et al.Cancer Appetite and Symptom Questionnaire(CASQ)for Brazilian patients:crosscultural adaptation and validation study[J].PLoS One,2016,11(6):e0156288.
    [12]徐力,白晶.健脾益肾方联合甲地孕酮对消化系肿瘤恶病质30例FAACT的影响[J].南京中医药大学学报,2011,27(4):381-3.[Xu L,Bai J.The influence of Jianpi Yishen Fang combined with megestrol on FAACT of 30 patients with digestive tumor cachexia[J].Nanjing Zhong Yi Yao Da Xue Xue Bao,2011,27(4):381-3.]

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700