我国托育服务管理职责体系建设——兼论托育服务行政主管部门的确立
|
摘要
西方主要国家托育服务行政管理职责体系大致归结为四种运行机制各不相同的模式。从我国托育服务行政管理的历史和现实来看,由教育部门或由卫生健康部门单独牵头的托育服务行政管理职责体系利弊参半。有鉴于此,建议在借鉴西方国家经验模式的基础上,充分结合我国的实际情况,在制度层面上确立地方基层政府作为托育服务行政管理的主导者和责任者,实现我国托育服务行政管理职责体系由传统的"业务部门主管"到"地方基层政府主导"的转型。
The responsibilities system of the childcare in the Western countries is roughly attributed to four different modes by operation. Based on the history and reality of the administrative management, the responsibility system of the childcare in China operated by the Education department or the Health department alone has mixed advantages and disadvantages. On the basis of the experience and lessons of Western countries, the actual situation of China’s childcare development should be fully integrated. It is suggested that the local government should be the leader and responsible entity of the administrative management of the childcare at the institutional level that transforming the responsibility system of childcare from ‘line management’ to ‘local government domination’.
The responsibilities system of the childcare in the Western countries is roughly attributed to four different modes by operation. Based on the history and reality of the administrative management, the responsibility system of the childcare in China operated by the Education department or the Health department alone has mixed advantages and disadvantages. On the basis of the experience and lessons of Western countries, the actual situation of China’s childcare development should be fully integrated. It is suggested that the local government should be the leader and responsible entity of the administrative management of the childcare at the institutional level that transforming the responsibility system of childcare from ‘line management’ to ‘local government domination’.
引文
[1]刘中一.多措并举加强0～3岁幼童托育工作[J].人口与计划生育,2016(11).
[2][5]戴建兵.我国适度普惠型儿童社会福利制度建设研究[D].华东师范大学,2015.
[3]OECD Directorate for Education.Starting Strong Curricula and Pedagogies in Early Childhood Education and Carefive curriculum outlines[M].Paris:OECD,2004:21.
[4]庞丽娟,刘小蕊.英国学前教育管理体制改革政策及其立法[J].学前教育研究,2008(1).
[6]史慧中.中华人民共和国幼儿教育50年大事记(二)[J].幼儿教育,1999(11).
[7]中国学前教育研究会编.中华人民共和国幼儿教育重要文献汇编[Z].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999:77.
[8][9]何媛,郝利鹏.我国当代0～3岁婴幼儿教育政策分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(3).
[10]梓涵.全国人大常委会委员陈秀榕代表:完善0～3岁儿童照料服务体系[J].中国民政,2016(6).
[11]丁煌,陈晓方.整体性政府视角下市县政府职责体系构建研究——以汕头市濠江区行政体制改革为例[J].中国行政管理,2017(8).
[2][5]戴建兵.我国适度普惠型儿童社会福利制度建设研究[D].华东师范大学,2015.
[3]OECD Directorate for Education.Starting Strong Curricula and Pedagogies in Early Childhood Education and Carefive curriculum outlines[M].Paris:OECD,2004:21.
[4]庞丽娟,刘小蕊.英国学前教育管理体制改革政策及其立法[J].学前教育研究,2008(1).
[6]史慧中.中华人民共和国幼儿教育50年大事记(二)[J].幼儿教育,1999(11).
[7]中国学前教育研究会编.中华人民共和国幼儿教育重要文献汇编[Z].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999:77.
[8][9]何媛,郝利鹏.我国当代0～3岁婴幼儿教育政策分析[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(3).
[10]梓涵.全国人大常委会委员陈秀榕代表:完善0～3岁儿童照料服务体系[J].中国民政,2016(6).
[11]丁煌,陈晓方.整体性政府视角下市县政府职责体系构建研究——以汕头市濠江区行政体制改革为例[J].中国行政管理,2017(8).