卓越法律人才培养背景下的国际法双语体验式模拟法庭教学
|
摘要
当前法学实践教学中存在教学范围过于集中在国内法、学生参与机会有限、准备过程缺乏充分有效的教师指导等问题。通过将双语教学、体验式教学、模拟法庭教学三种教学方式整合,国际法双语体验式模拟法庭教学模式能够提供更为国际化的案例研讨方式、更为充分的法庭全局体验机会和更为有效的教师介入指导。这种新的教学模式的关键是在师生之间和学生相互之间培养一种积极、多元的充分沟通和互动交流关系。该教学模式通过四个阶段的具体实施,以达成培养卓越涉外法律人才的目标。
Recently, legal practical teaching has many problems. For example, teaching scope is limited to domestic law; students have limited participation opportunities; practical process is lack of teachers' guidance, etc. Through the integration of bilingual teaching, experiential teaching and moot court teaching, the Bilingual Experiential Moot Court Teaching Mode for International Law can provide more interactional international case study methods, more opportunities of comprehensive court experience and more effective teacher-intervened guidance. The key to this new teaching mode is to cultivate positive and diverse communication and interaction relationships between teachers and students as well as between students. From a four-stage implementation, this new teaching mode will achieve the goal of cultivating outstanding foreign-related legal talents.
Recently, legal practical teaching has many problems. For example, teaching scope is limited to domestic law; students have limited participation opportunities; practical process is lack of teachers' guidance, etc. Through the integration of bilingual teaching, experiential teaching and moot court teaching, the Bilingual Experiential Moot Court Teaching Mode for International Law can provide more interactional international case study methods, more opportunities of comprehensive court experience and more effective teacher-intervened guidance. The key to this new teaching mode is to cultivate positive and diverse communication and interaction relationships between teachers and students as well as between students. From a four-stage implementation, this new teaching mode will achieve the goal of cultivating outstanding foreign-related legal talents.
引文
[1] 张辉.人类命运共同体:国际法社会基础理论的当代发展[J].中国社会科学,2018(5):43-68.
[2] 李伯军.国际法开展双语教学的必要性及基本思路[J].当代教育理论与实践,2011,3(4):52-54.
[3] 李文青.国际法双语课程考核方式探析[J].当代教育理论与实践,2014,6(3):44-45.
[4] 兰花.设立与比赛相结合的国际法模拟法庭课:必要性、作用与可行性[J].中国法学教育研究,2012(3):53-64.
[5] 卜璐.浅论模拟法庭竞赛对国际法教学的促进[J].公民与法,2013(5):58-60.
[6] 刘彬.中国国际法本科教学改革刍议[J].武大国际法评论,2014,17(2):387-400.
[7] 陈嘉.以学生为中心的国际法本科教学改革路径再论[J].现代教育科学,2018(4):80-84.
[8] 教育部,中央政法委员会.关于实施卓越法律人才教育培养计划的若干意见:教高[2011]10号[A/OL].(2011-12-23)[2018-01-02].http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s3875/201204/134451.html.
[9] 李建忠.论高校涉外法律人才培养机制的完善[J].浙江理工大学学报,2017,38(4):356-364.
[10] 董京波.国际法课程实践教学研究[J].中国法学教育研究,2008(4):127-137.
[11] 韩秀丽.对中国国际法教学的反思[J].教书育人·高教论坛,2010(9):62-64.
[12] Baker C. Key issues in bilingualism and bilingual education. Multilingual matters 35[J]. European Journal of Education,1988,25(4):232.
[13] Smith T E, Roland C C, Havens M D, et al. The theory and practice of challenge education[J]. Adventure Education,1992:293.
[14] 范姣艳.《国际法》课堂教学中多元化教学方法的思考[J].时代教育,2015(6):77-78.
[15] Scalia A, Garner B A, Pusey A. Making your case: The art of persuading judges[J]. Aba Journal,2008,94(5):41-47.
[16] 何志鹏.中国国际法教学提升的“道”与“术”[J].中国大学教学,2017(4):17-25.
[17] Dimitri J, Greip M, Salmon S.The Moot Court Advisor's Handbook[M].Durham: Carolina Academic Press,2015:172-174.
[2] 李伯军.国际法开展双语教学的必要性及基本思路[J].当代教育理论与实践,2011,3(4):52-54.
[3] 李文青.国际法双语课程考核方式探析[J].当代教育理论与实践,2014,6(3):44-45.
[4] 兰花.设立与比赛相结合的国际法模拟法庭课:必要性、作用与可行性[J].中国法学教育研究,2012(3):53-64.
[5] 卜璐.浅论模拟法庭竞赛对国际法教学的促进[J].公民与法,2013(5):58-60.
[6] 刘彬.中国国际法本科教学改革刍议[J].武大国际法评论,2014,17(2):387-400.
[7] 陈嘉.以学生为中心的国际法本科教学改革路径再论[J].现代教育科学,2018(4):80-84.
[8] 教育部,中央政法委员会.关于实施卓越法律人才教育培养计划的若干意见:教高[2011]10号[A/OL].(2011-12-23)[2018-01-02].http://old.moe.gov.cn//publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s3875/201204/134451.html.
[9] 李建忠.论高校涉外法律人才培养机制的完善[J].浙江理工大学学报,2017,38(4):356-364.
[10] 董京波.国际法课程实践教学研究[J].中国法学教育研究,2008(4):127-137.
[11] 韩秀丽.对中国国际法教学的反思[J].教书育人·高教论坛,2010(9):62-64.
[12] Baker C. Key issues in bilingualism and bilingual education. Multilingual matters 35[J]. European Journal of Education,1988,25(4):232.
[13] Smith T E, Roland C C, Havens M D, et al. The theory and practice of challenge education[J]. Adventure Education,1992:293.
[14] 范姣艳.《国际法》课堂教学中多元化教学方法的思考[J].时代教育,2015(6):77-78.
[15] Scalia A, Garner B A, Pusey A. Making your case: The art of persuading judges[J]. Aba Journal,2008,94(5):41-47.
[16] 何志鹏.中国国际法教学提升的“道”与“术”[J].中国大学教学,2017(4):17-25.
[17] Dimitri J, Greip M, Salmon S.The Moot Court Advisor's Handbook[M].Durham: Carolina Academic Press,2015:172-174.