传统村落旅游地空间生产与认同研究——以苏州市陆巷村为例
|
摘要
采取参与观察、深度访谈等方法对苏州市陆巷村多维空间的生产和多元主体认同倾向进行分析。结果表明:在陆巷村的物理空间中,资本有助于促进景观空间和服务空间的形成,社会空间呈现出社区联结弱化和开发主体繁杂化的特点,文化空间出现功能多样化的复合型文化空间;针对陆巷村的空间生产,开发者、部分游客和参与旅游开发的居民表现出结构主义认同倾向,部分游客和未参与旅游开发的居民表现出人本主义认同倾向。有效引导居民参与旅游开发,深入挖掘地方文化,协调多元主体间的社会关系,是提高陆巷村旅游开发活力和保持协调健康发展的关键。
This paper adopted the research methods of participation observation and in-depth interviews to analyze the production of multi-dimensional space and the tendency of multi-subject identity in Luxiang Village. The results showed that: In the physical space of Luxiang Village,the capital contributed to the formation of landscape space and service space,the social space presented the characteristics of weak community connection and multifarious development subjects,the cultural space appeared a complex cultural space with diversified functions. In view of the production of space in Luxiang Village,developers,some tourists and residents who participated in tourism development showed the tendency of structuralism identity,while the other tourists and residents who had not participated in tourism development showed a tendency of humanistic identity. The key was effectively guiding residents to participate in tourism development,deepening local culture and coordinating social relations among multiple subjects,to improve the vitality of tourism development and maintaining coordinated and healthy development in Luxiang Village.
This paper adopted the research methods of participation observation and in-depth interviews to analyze the production of multi-dimensional space and the tendency of multi-subject identity in Luxiang Village. The results showed that: In the physical space of Luxiang Village,the capital contributed to the formation of landscape space and service space,the social space presented the characteristics of weak community connection and multifarious development subjects,the cultural space appeared a complex cultural space with diversified functions. In view of the production of space in Luxiang Village,developers,some tourists and residents who participated in tourism development showed the tendency of structuralism identity,while the other tourists and residents who had not participated in tourism development showed a tendency of humanistic identity. The key was effectively guiding residents to participate in tourism development,deepening local culture and coordinating social relations among multiple subjects,to improve the vitality of tourism development and maintaining coordinated and healthy development in Luxiang Village.
引文
[1]王云才.国际乡村旅游发展的政策经验与借鉴[J].旅游学刊,2002,17(4)∶45-50.
[2]孙九霞,黄秀波,王学基,等.旅游地特色街区的“非地方化”:制度脱嵌视角的解释[J].旅游学刊,2017,32(9)∶24-33.
[3]吴必虎,徐小波.传统村落与旅游活化:学理与法理分析[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017,21(1)∶5-21.
[4]Blunt A,Varley A. Geographies of Home[J]. Cultural Geographies,2004,11(1)∶3-6.
[5]包亚明.现代性与空间的生产[M].上海教育出版社,2003∶85-96.
[6]苏贾.后现代地理学———重申批判社会理论中的空间[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007∶116-120.
[7]Massey D. Space,Place and Gender[M]. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1994∶146-156.
[8]朱,钱俊希,吕旭萍.城市空间变迁背景下的地方感知与身份认同研究———以广州小洲村为例[J].地理科学,2012,32(1)∶18-24.
[9]孙九霞,周一.日常生活视野中的旅游社区空间再生产研究———基于列斐伏尔与德塞图的理论视角[J].地理学报,2014,69(10)∶1575-1589.
[10]魏冀明.旅游型传统村落的空间生产[D].广州:华南理工大学硕士学位论文,2014.
[11]沈玉立.现代旅游背景下传统村落的地方性演变与建构[D].昆明:云南师范大学硕士学位论文,2017.
[12]孙莹,肖大威.认同区分———梅州客家传统村落边界空间的社会内涵[J].小城镇建设,2015,(4)∶99-104.
[13]郭文,王丽.文化遗产旅游地的空间生产与认同研究———以无锡惠山古镇为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(6)∶708-716.
[14]施晓平.陆巷:古村藏着19处明代建筑[J].建筑工人,2013,(5)∶56-56.
[15]李凡,杨俭波,何伟财.快速城市化背景下佛山传统祠堂文化景观变化以及地方认同的建构[J].人文地理,2013,28(6)∶9-16.
[16]Yi-fu Tuan.经验透视中的空间与地方[M].台北:国立编译馆,1998∶143-181.
[2]孙九霞,黄秀波,王学基,等.旅游地特色街区的“非地方化”:制度脱嵌视角的解释[J].旅游学刊,2017,32(9)∶24-33.
[3]吴必虎,徐小波.传统村落与旅游活化:学理与法理分析[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017,21(1)∶5-21.
[4]Blunt A,Varley A. Geographies of Home[J]. Cultural Geographies,2004,11(1)∶3-6.
[5]包亚明.现代性与空间的生产[M].上海教育出版社,2003∶85-96.
[6]苏贾.后现代地理学———重申批判社会理论中的空间[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007∶116-120.
[7]Massey D. Space,Place and Gender[M]. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1994∶146-156.
[8]朱,钱俊希,吕旭萍.城市空间变迁背景下的地方感知与身份认同研究———以广州小洲村为例[J].地理科学,2012,32(1)∶18-24.
[9]孙九霞,周一.日常生活视野中的旅游社区空间再生产研究———基于列斐伏尔与德塞图的理论视角[J].地理学报,2014,69(10)∶1575-1589.
[10]魏冀明.旅游型传统村落的空间生产[D].广州:华南理工大学硕士学位论文,2014.
[11]沈玉立.现代旅游背景下传统村落的地方性演变与建构[D].昆明:云南师范大学硕士学位论文,2017.
[12]孙莹,肖大威.认同区分———梅州客家传统村落边界空间的社会内涵[J].小城镇建设,2015,(4)∶99-104.
[13]郭文,王丽.文化遗产旅游地的空间生产与认同研究———以无锡惠山古镇为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(6)∶708-716.
[14]施晓平.陆巷:古村藏着19处明代建筑[J].建筑工人,2013,(5)∶56-56.
[15]李凡,杨俭波,何伟财.快速城市化背景下佛山传统祠堂文化景观变化以及地方认同的建构[J].人文地理,2013,28(6)∶9-16.
[16]Yi-fu Tuan.经验透视中的空间与地方[M].台北:国立编译馆,1998∶143-181.