混播或单播箭筈豌豆、绿麦草对水分胁迫的形态特征响应
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Morphological characteristics of water stress in mixed or unicast seeding of Vicia sativa and Secale cereal in Tibet
  • 作者:王富强 ; 向洁 ; 王立威 ; 余成群 ; 沈振西 ; 邵小明
  • 英文作者:WANG Fuqiang;XIANG Jie;WANG Liwei;YU Chengqun;SHEN Zhenxi;SHAO Xiaoming;College of Resources and Environmental Sciences/Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Agricultural, China Agricultural University;Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy Sciences;Engineering and Technology Research Center for Prataculture on the Tibet Plateau;
  • 关键词:箭筈豌豆 ; 绿麦草 ; 混播 ; 水分胁迫 ; 形态特征
  • 英文关键词:Vicia sativa;;Secale cereal;;mixtures;;water stress;;morphological characteristics
  • 中文刊名:CYKX
  • 英文刊名:Pratacultural Science
  • 机构:中国农业大学资源与环境学院/生物多样性与有机农业北京市重点实验室;中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所;西藏高原草业工程技术研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-07-15
  • 出版单位:草业科学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.312
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划“西藏退化高寒生态系统恢复与重建技术及示范”(2016YFC0502005);; 西藏饲草产业专项(XZ201801NA02);; 西藏本土紫花苜蓿根瘤菌产品研究与示范(XZ201801NB20)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CYKX201907016
  • 页数:11
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:62-1069/S
  • 分类号:140-150
摘要
以一年生牧草箭筈豌豆(Vicia sativa)与绿麦草(Secale cereale)为研究对象,人工模拟不同水分胁迫对混播或单播牧草的影响。结果表明,水分胁迫16 d后箭筈豌豆单播的土壤含水量均显著高于其他混播处理和绿麦草单播(P <0.05);水分胁迫影响了牧草的生长发育,抑制箭筈豌豆的叶长、叶宽及绿麦草的叶宽,而对绿麦草的叶长影响不大;同时水分胁迫会促进根系的伸长生长,各处理到水分胁迫20 d时(部分处理出现干旱导致植物死亡时的阶段胁迫结束)箭筈豌豆根长均达到本次胁迫处理的最大值,其中箭筈豌豆单播处理的根长最长(37.83 cm);绿麦草根长变化规律与箭筈豌豆相似,胁迫后期JL1(箭筈豌豆25%+绿麦草75%)处理中绿麦草的根长最长,为60.5 cm,显著高于其他混播处理(P <0.05);株高和叶长、叶宽的抗旱系数值均小于1,而根长的抗旱系数均大于1,表明在土壤水分胁迫的条件下,抑制了植物地上部的生长,促进了地下部根系的伸长生长;通过隶属函数法对箭筈豌豆与绿麦草的抗旱性进行综合评价得出,单播箭筈豌豆的抗旱性最强,试验设计的3个比例混播处理较单播而言没有明显的抗旱优势。
        In this study, the effects of different degrees of water stress on mixed or unicast forage grasses were simulated by using annual grazing peas and green wheatgrass, and the responses of morphological characteristics to water stress were preliminarily investigated. The results showed that after 16 days of water stress, the soil moisture content of a pea(Vicia sativa) unicast was significantly higher than those of other mixed treatments and rye(Secale cereal) unicast(P < 0.05).Water stress affected the growth and development of forage grass, inhibited the leaf length and width of pea, and inhibited the leaf width of rye, but had little effect on the leaf length of rye. Additionally, water stress promoted root elongation. The root length of peas reached a maximum at 20 days after water stress(part of the treatment was the end of stage stress when drought causes plant death), and the root length of unicast pea was the longest(37.83 cm). The change in root length in rye was similar to that in pea. The root length of rye in JL1(pea 25% + rye 75%) was 60.5 cm, which was significantly higher than those after other mixed treatments(P < 0.05). The drought resistance coefficient of the plant height and leaf length width was less than 1, and the root drought resistance coefficient was greater than 1, which inhibits plant growth aboveground, while the elongation and growth of underground roots were promoted. In this study, comprehensive evaluation of the drought resistance of pea and rye by the membership function method showed that the unicast pea has the strongest drought resistance, and the 3 proportionally mixed sowing designs exhibited no obvious drought resistance advantage when compared with the unicast.
引文
[1]许维宏,吴宁,吴福忠.干旱条件下植物生长适应策略研究进展.世界科技研究与发展,2010,32(2):176-179.XU W H,WU N,WU F Z.Progress of plant adaptive strategies to the drought environment.World Science and Technology Research&Development,2010,32(2):176-179.
    [2]龚吉蕊,黄永梅,葛之葳,段庆伟,尤鑫,安然,张新时.4种杂交杨对土壤水分变化的生态学响应.植物生态学报,2009,33(2):387-396.GONG J R,HUANG Y M,GE Z W,DUAN Q W,YOU X,AN R,ZHANG X S.Ecological response to soil water content in four hybrid populus clones.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2009,33(2):387-396.
    [3]ROUHI V,SAMSON R,LEMEUR R,DAMME P.Photosynthetic gas exchange characteristics in three different almond species during drought stress and subsequent recovery.Environmental and Experimental Botany,2007,59(2):117-129.
    [4]李永华,卢琦,吴波,朱雅娟,刘殿军,张金鑫,靳占虎.干旱区叶片形态特征与植物响应和适应的关系.植物生态学报,2012,36(1):88-98.LI Y H,LU Q,WU B,ZHU Y J,LIU D J,ZHANG J X,JIN Z H.A review of leaf morphology plasticity linked to plant response and adaptation characteristics in arid ecosystems.Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology,2012,36(1):88-98.
    [5]REN H,XU Z,ZHANG W,JIANG L,HUANG J,CHEN S,WANG L,HAN X.Linking ethylene to nitrogen-dependent leaf longevity of grass species in a temperate steppe.Annals of Botany,2013,112(9):1879-1885.
    [6]山仑,陈培元.旱地农业生态生理基础.北京:科学出版社,1998.SHAN L,CHEN P Y.Dryland Agricultural Ecological and Physiological Basis.Beijing:Science Press,1998.
    [7]赵国靖.黄土丘陵区两乡土草混播下根系形态特征及其对土壤水分变化的响应.杨凌:西北农林科技大学硕士学位论文,2014.ZHAO G J.Response of root morphological characteristics to soil water change of two native species in Loess Hilly-Gully Region under intercropping.Master Thesis.Yangling:Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University,2014.
    [8]GUO W,LI B,ZHANG X,WANG R.Architectural plasticity and growth responses of Hippophae rhamnoides and Caragana intermedia seedlings to simulated water stress.Journal of Arid Environments,2007,69(3):385-399.
    [9]RODIVATI A,ARISOESILANINGSIH E,ISAGI Y,NAKAGOSHI N.Responses of Cyperus brevifolius(Rottb.)Hassk.and Cyperus kyllingia Endl.to varying soil water availability.Environmental and Experimental Botany,2005,53(3):259-269.
    [10]王旭,曾昭海,胡跃高,朱波.豆科与禾本科牧草混播效应研究进展.中国草地学报,2007,29(4):92-98.WANG X,ZENG Z H,HU Y G,ZHU B.Progress and prospect on mixture of gramineae herbage and leguminosae herbage.Chinese Journal of Grassland,2007,29(4):92-98.
    [11]沈海花,朱言坤,赵霞,耿晓庆,高树琴,方精云.中国草地资源的现状分析.科学通报,2016(2):139-154.SHEN H H,ZHU Y K,ZHAO X,GENG X Q,GAO S Q,FANG J Y.Analysis of current grassland resources in China.Science Bulletin,2016(2):139-154.
    [12]SAIA S,URSO V,AMATO G,FRENDA A,GIAMBALVO D,RUISI P,DI M.Mediterranean forage legumes grown alone or in mixture with annual ryegrass:biomass production,N2 fixation,and indices of intercrop efficiency.Plant and Soil,2016,402(1-2):395-407.
    [13]白音仓,王晓力,启忠,常秉文.紫花苜蓿混播草地干草产量动态研究.北京:第四届中国苜蓿发展大会,2011:143-146.BAI Y C,WANG X L,QI Z,CHANG B W.Dynamics of hay yield in alfalfa mixed grassland.Beijing:The 4th China Development Conference,2011:143-146.
    [14]谢开云,赵云,李向林,何峰,万里强,王丹,韩冬梅.豆-禾混播草地种间关系研究进展.草业学报,2013,22(3):284-296.XIE K Y,ZHAO Y,LI X L,HE F,WAN L Q,WANG D,HAN D M.Relationships between grasses and legumes in mixed grassland:A review.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2013,22(3):284-296.
    [15]CARRANCA C.Legumes:Properties and symbiosis.Symbiosis:Evolution,biology and ecological effects.New York:Animal Science,Issues and Professions,Nova Science Publishers,2013:67-94.
    [16]CARRANCA C,TORRES M O,MADEIRA M.Underestimated role of legume roots for soil N fertility.Agronomy for Sustainable Development,2015,35(3):1095-1102.
    [17]王平.半干旱地区禾-豆混播草地生产力及种间关系研究.长春:东北师范大学博士学位论文,2006.WANG P.Research on interspecific relationship and productivity of grass-legume mixture in semi-arid area.PhD Thesis.Changchun:Northeast Normal University,2006.
    [18]王建光.农牧交错区苜蓿-禾草混播模式研究.北京:中国农业科学院博士学位论文,2012.WANG J G.Study on mixed-sowing modes of alfalfa and grasses in the farming pasture region.PhD Thesis.Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,2012.
    [19]CHAPAGAIN T,RISEMAN A.Nitrogen and carbon transformations,water use efficiency and ecosystem productivity in monocultures and wheat-bean intercropping systems.Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2015,101(1):107-121.
    [20]JOSE S,GILESPIE A,SEIFERT J,BIEHLE D.Defining competition vectors in a temperate alley cropping system in the midwestern USA:3.Competition for nitrogen and litter decomposition dynamics.Agroforestry Systems,2000,48(1):61-77.
    [21]朱林,郑淑欣,许兴,候志军.宁夏中部灌水量对豆-禾牧草混播的影响.草业科学,2014,31(9):1752-1760.ZHU L,ZHENG S X,XU X,HOU Z J.Effects of irrigation on mixed sowing of leguminous and graminaceous forages.Pratacultural Science,2014,31(9):1752-1760.
    [22]赵雪雁,万文玉,王伟军.近50年气候变化对青藏高原牧草生产潜力及物候期的影响.中国生态农业学报,2016(4):532-543.ZHAO X Y,WAN W Y,WANG W J.Impact of climate change on potential productivity and phenological phase of forage in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in the past 50 years.Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2016(4):532-543.
    [23]侯亚红,强小林.西藏河谷农区灌水和中后期降雨对高产青稞耗水量与产量的影响.中国农学通报,2015,31(26):170-175.HOU Y H,QIANG X L.Effect of irrigation and rainfall on water consumption characteristics and yield of high yield Highland Barley in Tibet River valley.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2015,31(26):170-175.
    [24]王传旗,苗彦军,王建林,梁莎,次旺卓玛,赵玉红,徐雅梅.西藏野生垂穗披碱草苗期抗旱性研究.中国草地学报,2017,39(4):116-120.WANG C Q,MIAO Y J,WANG J L,LIANG S,Ciwangzhuoma,ZHAO Y H,XU Y M.Studies on drought resistance of wild elymus nutans in Tibet under drought stress at seedling stage.Chinese Journal of Grassland,2017,39(4):116-120.
    [25]刘敏,龚吉蕊,王忆慧,张梓榆,徐沙,罗亲普.豆禾混播建植人工草地对牧草产量和草质的影响.干旱区研究,2016,33(1):179-185.LIU M,GONG J R,WANG Y H,ZHANG Z Y,XU S,LUO Q P.Effects of legume-grass mixed sowing on forage grass yield and quality in artificial grassland.Arid Zone Research,2016,33(1):179-185.
    [26]祁军,郑伟,张鲜花,唐高溶,王祥,朱进忠.不同豆禾混播模式的草地生产性能.草业科学,2016,33(1):116-128.QI J,ZHENG W,ZHANG X H,TANG G R,WANG X,ZHU J Z.Determination and comparison of the production performance of pastures among different spatial structure of legume-grass mixtures.Pratacultural Science,2016,33(1):116-128.
    [27]郑伟,加娜尔古丽,唐高溶,朱进忠.不同混播方式下豆禾混播草地群落稳定性的测度与比较.草业学报,2015,24(3):155-167.ZHENG W,Jianarguli,TANG G R,ZHU J Z.Determination and comparison of community stability in different legume-grass mixes.Acta Prataculturae Sinica,2015,24(3):155-167.
    [28]郑伟,加娜尔古丽,唐高溶,朱进忠.混播种类与混播比例对豆禾混播草地浅层土壤养分的影响.草业科学,2015,32(3):329-339.ZHENG W,Jianarguli,TANG G R,ZHU J Z.Effects of mixed species,mixed ratios of legume to grass on soil nutrients in surface soils of legume-grass mixture pasture.Pratacultural Science,2015,32(3):329-339.
    [29]张强强,景亚平,杨雪,蒋烈戈,李福星.塔尔巴克台山东段山区豆禾混播草地的土壤理化性质.草业科学,2014,31(8):1523-1527.ZHANG Q Q,JING Y P,YANG X,JIANG L G,LI F X.Soil physical and chemical properties of different mix-sown combination pasture.Pratacultural Science,2014,31(8):1523-1527.
    [30]李锦华,张小甫,田福平,乔国华,黄秀霞,苗小林.西藏达孜箭筈豌豆西牧324播种期试验.中国草食动物,2011,31(5):40-42.LI J H,ZHANG X F,TIAN F P,QIAO G H,HUANG X X,MIAO X L.Arrow peas Ximu 324 sowing period test at Dazi,Tibet.China Herbivores,2011,31(5):40-42.
    [31]崔纪菡.施氮对西藏主栽饲草产量,养分累积和氮利用的影响.北京:中国农业大学博士学位论文,2015.CUI J H.Effect of Nitrogen fertilization on biomass,nutrient accumulation and nitrogen utilization of main forages in Tibet,China.PhD Thesis.Beijing:China Agriculture University,2015.
    [32]杨晓,李锦华,朱新强,余成群,沈振西.西藏达孜箭筈豌豆不同播种期种子生产性能研究.中国草食动物科学,2013(5):37-39.YANG X,LI J H,ZHU X Q,YU C Q,SHEN Z X.Study on the seed production on different sowing date of Vicia sativa in Dazi of Tibet.China Herbivore Science,2013(5):37-39.
    [33]BLUM A,JORDAN W R.Breeding crop varieties for stress environments.Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences,1985,2(3):199-238.
    [34]王晓龙,李红,杨曌,杨伟光,柴华.干旱胁迫下4种禾本科牧草根系抗旱性比较.中国饲料,2016(13):22-24.WANG X L,LI H,YANG Z,YANG W G,CHAI H.Comparison on the root drought resistance of four grass species under drought stress.China Feed,2016(13):22-24.
    [35]卢素锦,周青平,刘文辉,梁国玲,肖剑波.披碱草属6种牧草苗期抗旱性鉴定.湖北农业科学,2013,52(8):1889-1892.LU S J,ZHOU Q P,LIU W H,LIANG G L,XIAO J B.Identification on drought-resistance of six species of Elymus at seedlings stage.Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2013,52(8):1889-1892.
    [36]黎燕琼,刘兴良,郑绍伟,陈泓,岳永杰,慕长龙,刘军.岷江上游干旱河谷四种灌木的抗旱生理动态变化.生态学报,2007,27(3):3.LI Y Q,LIU X L,ZHENG S W,CHEN H,YUE Y J,MU C L,LIU J.Drought resistant physiological characteristics of 4 shrub species in arid valley of Minjiang River.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2007,27(3):3.
    [37]刘佳,徐昌旭,曹卫东,谢志坚,秦文婧.PEG胁迫下15份紫云英种质材料萌发期的抗旱性鉴定.中国草地学报,2012,34(6):18-25.LIU J,XU C X,CAO W D,XIE Z J,QING W J.Study on drought resistance of 15 accessions of Astragalus sinicus L.germplasm materials at seed germination stage under PEG stress.Chinese Journal of Grassland,2012,34(6):18-25.
    [38]刘菲,何友军,颜立红,蒋燚,宋倩.3种豆科藤本植物抗旱性研究.中国农学通报,2014,30(7):28-32.LIU F,HE Y J,YAN L H,JIANG Y,SONG Q.Study on drought resistance of 3 species of Leguminosae Lianas.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2014,30(7):28-32.
    [39]BOUSLAMA M,SCHAPAUGH W.Stress tolerance in soybeans.I.Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance 1.Crop Science,1984,24(5):933-937.
    [40]张荟荟,杨钢,高洪文,顾祥,沙吾列,张一弓,王玉,付爱良.10份豆科牧草的苗期抗旱性综合评价.新疆农业科学,2013,50(5):938-943.ZHANG H H,YANG G,GAO H W,GU X,SHA W L,ZHANG Y G,WANG Y,FU A L.Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of ten Legume forage seedlings.Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences,2013,50(5):938-943.
    [41]毛培春,孟林,高洪文,张国芳,田小霞.20份无芒雀麦种质材料苗期抗旱性综合评价及光合特性分析.草地学报,2011,19(4):619-624.MAO P C,MENG L,GAO H W,ZHANG G F,TIAN X X.Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance and photosynthetic characteristic of 20 Bromus inermis Leyss.accessions at seedling stage.Acta Agrectir Sinica,2011,19(4):619-624.
    [42]谢楠,赵海明,李源,游永亮,李伟,刘贵波,刘宏彩.饲用黑麦,小黑麦品种苗期耐盐性评价及盐胁迫下的生理响应.草地学报,2016(1):84-92.XIE N,ZHAO H M,LI Y,YOU Y L,LI W,LIU G B,LIU H C.Salt tolerance evaluation and physiological responses of forage rye and triticale at seedling growth stages.Acta Agrectir Sinica,2016(1):84-92.
    [43]翟春梅,王赞,邓波,李源,高洪文.紫花苜蓿苗期抗旱性鉴定指标筛选及综合评价.干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(6):167-172.ZHAI C M,WANG Z,DENG B,LI Y,GAO H W.Effects of abscisic acid and salicylic acid on physiological characteristics of sesame seedlings under drought stress.Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2008,26(6):167-172.
    [44]张惠霞,陶玲.甘肃苜蓿地方品种抗旱性的种苗形态指标研究.青海草业,1997(2):7-12.ZHANG H X,TAO L.Study on seedling morphological indexes of drought resistance of loquat landraces in Gansu Province.Qinghai Prataculture,1997(2):7-12.
    [45]彭明俊,赵琳,温绍龙,郭永清,江期川,杨旭,郑科,郭玉红,张立新.4种禾本科牧草种子的抗旱性评价.西部林业科学,2006,35(2):74-77.PENG M J,ZHAO L,WEN S L,GUO Y Q,JIANG Q C,YANG X,ZHENG K,GUO Y H,ZHANG L X.Drought resistance of four kinds of gramineae forage grass.Journal of West China Forestry Science,2006,35(2):74-77.
    [46]邹燕,赵平.青藏高原年代际气候变化研究进展.气象科技,2008,36(2):168-173.ZOU Y,ZHAO P.Progresses in research on interdecadal climate variation over Tibetan Plateau.Meteorological Science and Technology,2008,36(2):168-173.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700