DR设备放射性性能检测数据统计与分析
|
摘要
目的:分析研究数字化X射线摄影系统(DR)设备放射性性能检测数据,为医院采购DR设备时的选择提供依据。方法:收集云南省三级甲等医院、三级乙等医院和地州县级医院的153台DR设备质量控制检测的数据分析结果,按照医院类型、设备国别以及设备使用年限对其进行对比分析。结果:在153台DR设备中三级甲等医院为50台、三级乙等医院为103台,三级甲等医院购置的DR设备中79.17%为进口设备;而三级乙等医院购置的DR设备中51.45%为进口设备。三级乙等医院购置的DR设备使用时间多以0~4年为主,而三级甲等医院购置的DR设备使用时间多以5~7年为主。结论:三级甲等医院大多选用的是进口设备,且使用年限比较长,而进口设备与国产设备对比发现,国产设备在质量稳定性和可靠性等方面尚有一定差距。
Objective: To analyze and research detection data of radioactivity performance of digital radiography(DR) equipment so as to provide reference for purchasing DR equipment in hospital. Methods: Through collected the analysis results of detection data of quality control of 153DR equipment of third level 1 st class hospital, third level 2 nd class hospital and county level hospital of Yunnan province. The comparison analysis about these DR equipments depended on the hospital type, nationality of equipment and duration of service. Results: There were 50 DR equipment and 103DR equipments in the third level 1 st class hospital and the third level 2 nd class hospital, respectively. And in the third level 1 st class hospital, there was 79.17% of DR equipments was imported equipment, while it was 51.45% in the third level 2 nd class hospital. Besides, the duration of service of the most of DR equipments was 0-4 yeras in the third level 2 nd class hospital, while it was 5-7 years in the third level 1 st class hospital. Conclusion: Most of the DR equipments in the third level 1 st hospitals are imported equipment, and their duration of service were longer. On the other hand, in the comparison between imported equipment and domestic equipment, there are a certainly gap in quality stability, reliability and other aspects.
Objective: To analyze and research detection data of radioactivity performance of digital radiography(DR) equipment so as to provide reference for purchasing DR equipment in hospital. Methods: Through collected the analysis results of detection data of quality control of 153DR equipment of third level 1 st class hospital, third level 2 nd class hospital and county level hospital of Yunnan province. The comparison analysis about these DR equipments depended on the hospital type, nationality of equipment and duration of service. Results: There were 50 DR equipment and 103DR equipments in the third level 1 st class hospital and the third level 2 nd class hospital, respectively. And in the third level 1 st class hospital, there was 79.17% of DR equipments was imported equipment, while it was 51.45% in the third level 2 nd class hospital. Besides, the duration of service of the most of DR equipments was 0-4 yeras in the third level 2 nd class hospital, while it was 5-7 years in the third level 1 st class hospital. Conclusion: Most of the DR equipments in the third level 1 st hospitals are imported equipment, and their duration of service were longer. On the other hand, in the comparison between imported equipment and domestic equipment, there are a certainly gap in quality stability, reliability and other aspects.
引文
[1]李保伟.数字化放射医学影像技术[J].医疗装备,2002,15(5):9-10.
[2]蒋伟,龚海艇,施玲华,等.DR图像质量控制方法探讨[J].上海医学影像,2009,18(2):161-163.
[3]陈玉勤.DR图像的质量控制与保证[J].医疗卫生装备,2005,26(2):42-42.
[4]陈晓红,任国荃,周丹,等.医疗设备质量控制体系构建实践与研究[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2008,15(4):384-386.
[5]国家卫生部.WS76-2011医用常规X射线诊断设备影像质量控制检测规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
[6]智研咨询集团.2016-2022年中国医疗器械市场竞争态势及市场前景预测报告[OL].(2016-04)[2017-06-12]http://www.chyxx.com/research/201604/410508.html.
[7]陈建荣,王秋生,吴俊华,等.进口与国产DR的影像特性及其临床应用比较[J].医学信息,2015,28(22):279-280.
[8]陈志罡.国产DR产品竞争战略研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2014.
[9]崔宝成.浅析DR国内影像医学[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,31(62):191-192.
[10]郭青.飞利浦医疗系统公司DR业务在中国的竞争战略研究[D].济南:山东大学,2009.
[11]祁吉.数字化X线摄影:现状与展望[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,1999(1):4-5.
[12]尹志军,马彪,漆兰涛,等.数字化X线摄影技术的进展[J].医用放射技术杂志,2003(12):5-6.
[13]余厚军.数字化X线摄影的特点分析与应用探讨[J].中国医疗器械信息,2009,15(11):78-81.
[14]王艳,王建福,张友平.普通X线摄影与数字化X线摄影的比较分析[J].医学理论与实践,2005,18(2):195-195.
[15]沈斌.数字化X线摄影(DR)图像质量控制与管理[J].医学理论与实践,2014(8):1086-1087.
[2]蒋伟,龚海艇,施玲华,等.DR图像质量控制方法探讨[J].上海医学影像,2009,18(2):161-163.
[3]陈玉勤.DR图像的质量控制与保证[J].医疗卫生装备,2005,26(2):42-42.
[4]陈晓红,任国荃,周丹,等.医疗设备质量控制体系构建实践与研究[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2008,15(4):384-386.
[5]国家卫生部.WS76-2011医用常规X射线诊断设备影像质量控制检测规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
[6]智研咨询集团.2016-2022年中国医疗器械市场竞争态势及市场前景预测报告[OL].(2016-04)[2017-06-12]http://www.chyxx.com/research/201604/410508.html.
[7]陈建荣,王秋生,吴俊华,等.进口与国产DR的影像特性及其临床应用比较[J].医学信息,2015,28(22):279-280.
[8]陈志罡.国产DR产品竞争战略研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2014.
[9]崔宝成.浅析DR国内影像医学[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,31(62):191-192.
[10]郭青.飞利浦医疗系统公司DR业务在中国的竞争战略研究[D].济南:山东大学,2009.
[11]祁吉.数字化X线摄影:现状与展望[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,1999(1):4-5.
[12]尹志军,马彪,漆兰涛,等.数字化X线摄影技术的进展[J].医用放射技术杂志,2003(12):5-6.
[13]余厚军.数字化X线摄影的特点分析与应用探讨[J].中国医疗器械信息,2009,15(11):78-81.
[14]王艳,王建福,张友平.普通X线摄影与数字化X线摄影的比较分析[J].医学理论与实践,2005,18(2):195-195.
[15]沈斌.数字化X线摄影(DR)图像质量控制与管理[J].医学理论与实践,2014(8):1086-1087.