摘要
对福建省生产领域的湿巾进行随机抽样和质量分析,分别检测了产品的含液量、包装密封性能、可迁移性荧光增白剂三个物理性能指标以及p H值指标。结果显示:福建省内湿巾生产企业在泉州市略有集中;近四年福建湿巾物理性能产品合格率达到100%;2015年和2016年的湿巾产品全部检出有荧光增白剂,但均不迁移;2017年和2018年的湿巾产品全部未检出荧光增白剂。近四年的湿巾p H值指标总体保持稳定,统计平均值在5.3~6.4之间,整体呈弱酸性。
Random sampling and quality analysis of wet wipes in Fujian province were conducted to test the liquid content, the package sealing performance, the content of migratory fluorescent whitening agent and pH value. The results showed that wet wipes production enterprises in Fujian are slightly concentrated in Quanzhou. In the past four years, the qualified rate of physical proper ties of wet wipes in Fujian has reached to 100%. All the wet wipes products in 2015 and 2016 had been detected to contain fluorescent brighteners, but not to migrate. No fluorescent whitening agents were found in the wet wipes products in 2017 and 2018. The pH of wet wipes has been remaining stable for the past four years. The statistical average is between 5.3 and 6.4,with overall weakly acidic.
引文
[1]郭惠萍,张美云,刘亚恒.荧光增白剂的毒性分析[J].湖南造纸,2007(4):43-45.
[2]孙红秀,刘翰林,赵举.四川省内市场销售的湿巾产品质量安全风险监测分析[J].纸和造纸,2017,36(4):34-38.
[3]杨玉喜.湿巾市场发展状况[J].日用化学品科学,2013,36(5):10-13.
[4]GB/T 27728-2011,湿巾[S].
[5]孙静,张玉兰,江曼霞.中国一次性卫生用品行业2017年概况和展望[J].造纸信息,2018(8):38-46.
[6]万富.婴儿湿巾中保湿剂、防腐剂、抗氧剂检测方法及应用研究[D].湖南大学,2018.
[7]郭仁宏,周颖红,黄美仪.生活用纸安全卫生质量标准析评[J].造纸科学与技术,2012,31(2):63-70.
[8]孔春红,陆冰.江苏对湿巾产品抽查的质量风险分析[J].中国质量技术监督,2015(10):72-74.