数字化直接和间接印模法在全瓷冠临床应用中的比较研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparison of clinical efficacy of all-ceramic crowns manufactured by digital direct intraoral versus indirect impressions
  • 作者:陈诚 ; 张琳梅 ; 赵许兵 ; 代泉 ; 程政
  • 英文作者:CHEN Cheng;ZHANG Linmei;ZHAO Xubing;DAI Quan;CHENG Zheng;Key Laboratory of Shaanxi Province for Craniofacial Precision Medicine Research,Department of General Dentistry,Xi'an Jiaotong University Stomatology Hospital;Stomatological Department of Xi'an Medical University;
  • 关键词:全瓷冠 ; 数字化口内印模技术 ; 硅橡胶印模技术
  • 英文关键词:all-ceramic crown;;digital intraoral impression;;silicone impression
  • 中文刊名:SXYX
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Shanxi Medical University
  • 机构:陕西省颅颌面精准医学研究重点实验室西安交通大学口腔医院综合科;西安医学院口腔系;
  • 出版日期:2018-09-14 13:39
  • 出版单位:山西医科大学学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.49;No.311
  • 基金:陕西省科技攻关项目(2014K11-03-08-05)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SXYX201809023
  • 页数:5
  • CN:09
  • ISSN:14-1216/R
  • 分类号:119-123
摘要
目的评价并比较数字化口内印模技术与传统精细印模技术在全瓷单冠修复中的临床效果。方法本研究将2016-12~2017-12在西安交通大学口腔医院综合科行二氧化锆全瓷单冠修复的74例患者纳入研究,其中35例采用3shape口内扫描仪直接法采集数据(直接组);39例采用硅橡胶制取印模后间接采集数据(间接组),完成最终修复,并记录取模和戴牙时间。戴牙后2周复诊时拟对患者进行满意度调查;戴牙完成2月后复诊,运用美国公共卫生署(USPHS)标准对修复体进行评价。结果共制作了135颗全瓷单冠,其中68颗为直接法,67颗间接法,直接组患者整体满意度高于间接组,在使用舒适度评价中直接法显著高于间接法,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);冠修复体边缘适合性评价中直接法显著优于间接法,其差异具有统计意义(P<0.05)。直接组平均取模时间长于间接组,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);直接组平均戴牙时间小于间接组,其差异也具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与间接法相比,直接数字化口内印模技术在全瓷单冠临床应用中效果更佳。
        Objective To evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of all-ceramic zirconia crowns manufactured by direct digital intraoral impression versus silicone impression.Methods Thirty-five patients received oral impression via 3shape intraoral scanner,while 39 patients underwent oral impression via silicone impression technique.The time of impression and time of set-up were recorded.The patient's satisfaction was compared 2 weeks after treatment.The ceramic crowns were evaluated by USPHS standard 3 months after treatment.Results Total 135 all-ceramic crowns were finished,of which 68 were made by direct intraoral scan,and 67 by indirect scanner.Compared with indirect technique,the ‘comfort'in satisfaction scale and ‘marginal fitness' in USPHS scale were significantly increased in those with direct impressive technique(P < 0.05).Compared with indirect group,the mean time of set-up was significantly shorten,while the mean time of impression was significantly increased in direct group.Conclusion In this study,direct digital impressive technique(3shape trios) can provide a better clinical outcome and quality of medical service.
引文
[1]陆亚倩,胡建.数字化印模技术修复应用的研究进展[J].口腔生物医学,2016,7(4):211-216.
    [2]黄婉怡,战德松.口内扫描数字化印模系统分类及其应用[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2017,10(8):452-457.
    [3]孙媛元,张晓霞.CEREC3口内扫描制作CAD/CAM全瓷修复体的研究[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2015,2(11):113-115.
    [4]Nedelcu R,Olsson P,Nystr9m I,et al.Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions:a novel in vivo analysis method[J].J Dent,2018,69:110-118.
    [5]刘园园,李雨珊,王红红,等.现阶段口内扫描技术的研究进展[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2016,3(20):13-14.
    [6]沈倍勇,张志新,刘小升,等.3 Shape Trios口内扫描仪制作全瓷冠桥修复体的临床效果[J].中国继续医学教育,2016,8(20):90-92.
    [7]黄婉怡,战德松.3shape Trios口内扫描仪制作的全瓷冠修复体临床效果评价[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2015,8(9):556-558.
    [8]Ng J,Ruse D,Wyatt C.A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods[J].J Prosthet Dent,2014,112(3):555-560.
    [9]Lee B,Oh KC,Haam D,et al.Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital impression procedures[J].J Prosthet Dent,2018:Epub ahead of print.
    [10]Malik J,Rodriguez J,Weisbloom M,et al.Comparison of accuracy between a conventional and two digital intraoral impression techniques[J].Asian Austral J Ani,2018,31(2):107-113.
    [11]Mehl A,Bosch G,Fischer C,et al.In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3d intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods[J].Int J Comput Dent,2017,20(4):343-361.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700