体育用品可持续设计方法排序研究
|
摘要
随着可持续发展理念的不断深入,社会对体育用品的可持续设计提出了更高的要求.为确定体育用品的可持续设计方法,利用梯形模糊数,基于模糊QFD对现有可持续设计方法进行排序.通过建立两个阶段质量屋将体育用品的可持续需求转换为可持续指标,再将可持续指标转换为可持续设计方法,并对其重要度进行排序.通过两个阶段质量屋的计算,结果显示生命周期评价、产品可持续指数和环境影响评估为排名前三的体育用品可持续设计方法,明确值分别为475,405和383.这一计算结果,为体育用品设计者实现可持续设计提供了科学的参考依据.
With the deepening of the concept of sustainable development,the society has put forward higher requirements for the sustainable design of sports products.In order to find the sustainable design method for sports product,this paper applies trapezoidal fuzzy numbers to prioritize existing sustainable methods basing on fuzzy QFD.By establishing twostage of house of quality,the sustainable demands of sports products axe transformed into sustainable indicators,and then the sustainable indicators are transformed into sustainable design methods,and their importance is ranked.According to the calculating results of the two stages of house of quality,it is showed that LCA,ProdSI and EIA axe ranked the first three sports product sustainable design methods with the crisp value of 475,405 and 383 respectively.This calculation result provides scientific reference for sports product designers to achieve sustainable design.
With the deepening of the concept of sustainable development,the society has put forward higher requirements for the sustainable design of sports products.In order to find the sustainable design method for sports product,this paper applies trapezoidal fuzzy numbers to prioritize existing sustainable methods basing on fuzzy QFD.By establishing twostage of house of quality,the sustainable demands of sports products axe transformed into sustainable indicators,and then the sustainable indicators are transformed into sustainable design methods,and their importance is ranked.According to the calculating results of the two stages of house of quality,it is showed that LCA,ProdSI and EIA axe ranked the first three sports product sustainable design methods with the crisp value of 475,405 and 383 respectively.This calculation result provides scientific reference for sports product designers to achieve sustainable design.
引文
[1]Masui K,Sakao T,Kobayashi M,et al.Applying quality function deployment to environmentally conscious design[J].International Journal of Quality&Reliability Management,2003,20(1):90-106.
[2]强力.体育设施产品(人造草、座椅)的环保可持续发展.中国聚氨酯工业协会中国聚氨酯工业协会铺装材料专业委员会第一届聚氨酯铺装材料行业生产、科研、技术交流会论文集[C]//中国聚氨酯工业协会,2011:3
[3]王德华.基于层次分析法的生态体育产品综合测度与评价[J].信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版),2017(01):155-159.
[4]王德华岳新坡.基于生态保护的绿色体育产品闭环供应链分析[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(04):113-116.
[5]齐慧芳·我国体育用品制造业可持续发展的因素分析[J].白城师范学院学报,2016(05):80-84-96.
[6]邵桂华·中国体育用品制造产业可持续发展之路:困境与突破[J].山东体育学院学报,2014(05):7-11.
[7]Agyekum E O,Fortuin K P J K,van der Harst E.Environmental and social life cycle assessment of bamboo bicycle frames made in Ghana[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016.
[8]Masui K S T,Inaba A.In Quality function deployment for environment:QFDE(1st report)-a methodology in early stage of DfE,Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing[C]//Proceedings EcoDesign,2001.
[9]Lee C,Lee E B.Prediction method of real discount rate to improve accuracy of life-cycle cost analysis[J].Energy and Buildings,2017,135:225-232.
[10]Shuaib M,Seevers D,Zhang X,et al.Product sustainability index[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2014,18(4):491-507.
[11]Fonseca A,Sanchez L E,Ribeiro J C J.Reforming EIA systems:A critical review of proposals in Brazil[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2017,62:90-97.
[12]Shen L,Zhang Z,Long Z.Significant barriers to green procurement in real estate development[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2017,116:160-168.
[13]Vinodh S,Manjunatheshwara K J,Sundaram S K,et al.Application of fuzzy quality function deployment for sustainable design of consumer electronics products:a case study[J].Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,2017,19(4):1021-1030.
[14]Bottani E.A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2009,119(2):380-391.
[15]Zhang F,Yang M,Liu W.Using integrated quality function deployment and theory of innovation problem solving approach for ergonomic product design[J].Computers&Industrial Engineering,2014,76:60-74.
[2]强力.体育设施产品(人造草、座椅)的环保可持续发展.中国聚氨酯工业协会中国聚氨酯工业协会铺装材料专业委员会第一届聚氨酯铺装材料行业生产、科研、技术交流会论文集[C]//中国聚氨酯工业协会,2011:3
[3]王德华.基于层次分析法的生态体育产品综合测度与评价[J].信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版),2017(01):155-159.
[4]王德华岳新坡.基于生态保护的绿色体育产品闭环供应链分析[J].河南教育学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(04):113-116.
[5]齐慧芳·我国体育用品制造业可持续发展的因素分析[J].白城师范学院学报,2016(05):80-84-96.
[6]邵桂华·中国体育用品制造产业可持续发展之路:困境与突破[J].山东体育学院学报,2014(05):7-11.
[7]Agyekum E O,Fortuin K P J K,van der Harst E.Environmental and social life cycle assessment of bamboo bicycle frames made in Ghana[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016.
[8]Masui K S T,Inaba A.In Quality function deployment for environment:QFDE(1st report)-a methodology in early stage of DfE,Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing[C]//Proceedings EcoDesign,2001.
[9]Lee C,Lee E B.Prediction method of real discount rate to improve accuracy of life-cycle cost analysis[J].Energy and Buildings,2017,135:225-232.
[10]Shuaib M,Seevers D,Zhang X,et al.Product sustainability index[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2014,18(4):491-507.
[11]Fonseca A,Sanchez L E,Ribeiro J C J.Reforming EIA systems:A critical review of proposals in Brazil[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2017,62:90-97.
[12]Shen L,Zhang Z,Long Z.Significant barriers to green procurement in real estate development[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2017,116:160-168.
[13]Vinodh S,Manjunatheshwara K J,Sundaram S K,et al.Application of fuzzy quality function deployment for sustainable design of consumer electronics products:a case study[J].Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy,2017,19(4):1021-1030.
[14]Bottani E.A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2009,119(2):380-391.
[15]Zhang F,Yang M,Liu W.Using integrated quality function deployment and theory of innovation problem solving approach for ergonomic product design[J].Computers&Industrial Engineering,2014,76:60-74.