论韩愈对李实的矛盾态度
|
摘要
韩愈《上李尚书书》与《顺宗实录》中对李实的评价完全相反,因为《顺宗实录》是韩愈主持修撰,故后世论者均据此发表议论,樊汝霖、魏了翁、王元启、罗大经、顾炎武等,各持己见。然尽管韩愈对李实的态度确存矛盾,考察《顺宗实录》的修撰情况,其中所书之情却未必出自他之手,故就此发表议论有失偏颇。韩愈之"谄"与其文人身份和清客生涯相关,对他的议论纷呈缘于其文人道学双重身份,亦反映了对他接受的广泛性。
A letter to Li Shangshu and Faithful Record of Emperor Shun written by Han Yu has contradictory attitude towards Li Shi. Because Faithful Record of Shun Emperor is compiled under the charge of Han Yu, many scholars such as Fan Rulin, Wei Liaoweng, Wang Yuanqi, Luo Dajing, Gu Yangwu discussed it. But, even though there is a contradictory attitude, investigations into compilation of the book shows that the content is not necessarily written by Han Yu himself. So, it is unfair to make judgments based on it. Han Yu's "flattery" has to do with his scholar's identity. The many discussions surrounding him stems from his scholar and neo-Confucianism's dual identity, which also reflects that he is extensively accepted.
A letter to Li Shangshu and Faithful Record of Emperor Shun written by Han Yu has contradictory attitude towards Li Shi. Because Faithful Record of Shun Emperor is compiled under the charge of Han Yu, many scholars such as Fan Rulin, Wei Liaoweng, Wang Yuanqi, Luo Dajing, Gu Yangwu discussed it. But, even though there is a contradictory attitude, investigations into compilation of the book shows that the content is not necessarily written by Han Yu himself. So, it is unfair to make judgments based on it. Han Yu's "flattery" has to do with his scholar's identity. The many discussions surrounding him stems from his scholar and neo-Confucianism's dual identity, which also reflects that he is extensively accepted.
引文
[1][清]王元启.读韩记疑[M].(古籍善本下载)(认为此时韩愈未罢博士,“将仕郎前守四门博士韩愈”中的“前”是衍文。)
[2][唐]韩愈.韩昌黎文集校注[M].马其昶校注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:156.
[3]出自苏轼.韩文公庙碑[C]//吴文治主编.韩愈资料汇编.北京:中华书局,2003:146.
[4]王暨英,曾茂林等.民国金堂县续志[C]//中国地方志集成·四川府县志·辑4 . 巴蜀书社,1992.
[5]文渊阁四库全书(第1074册)[M].台湾:商务印书馆,1983-1986.
[6]文渊阁四库全书(第853册)[M].台湾:商务印书馆,1983-1986:853-69.
[7]《续修四库全书》序(第1310册). 上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[8]王瑞来点校. 罗大经撰. 《鹤林玉露》甲编自序. 北京:中华书局,1983:1.
[9]黄汝成集释. 顾炎武. 日知录[M]. 台湾:世界书局,1935.
[10]华忱之点校. 顾炎武.顾亭林诗文集·与潘次耕书[M]. 北京:中华书局,1983.
[11]华忱之点校. 顾炎武. 顾亭林诗文集·初刻《日知录》自序[M]. 北京:中华书局,1983.
[12][唐]韩愈.韩昌黎文集校注[M].马其昶校注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[13]旧唐书·卷160[M]. 北京:中华书局,1983.
[14]王阳明. 《王文成公全书》卷三十一《年谱》[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.
[2][唐]韩愈.韩昌黎文集校注[M].马其昶校注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:156.
[3]出自苏轼.韩文公庙碑[C]//吴文治主编.韩愈资料汇编.北京:中华书局,2003:146.
[4]王暨英,曾茂林等.民国金堂县续志[C]//中国地方志集成·四川府县志·辑4 . 巴蜀书社,1992.
[5]文渊阁四库全书(第1074册)[M].台湾:商务印书馆,1983-1986.
[6]文渊阁四库全书(第853册)[M].台湾:商务印书馆,1983-1986:853-69.
[7]《续修四库全书》序(第1310册). 上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
[8]王瑞来点校. 罗大经撰. 《鹤林玉露》甲编自序. 北京:中华书局,1983:1.
[9]黄汝成集释. 顾炎武. 日知录[M]. 台湾:世界书局,1935.
[10]华忱之点校. 顾炎武.顾亭林诗文集·与潘次耕书[M]. 北京:中华书局,1983.
[11]华忱之点校. 顾炎武. 顾亭林诗文集·初刻《日知录》自序[M]. 北京:中华书局,1983.
[12][唐]韩愈.韩昌黎文集校注[M].马其昶校注.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[13]旧唐书·卷160[M]. 北京:中华书局,1983.
[14]王阳明. 《王文成公全书》卷三十一《年谱》[M]. 上海:上海古籍出版社,1992.