监察体制改革下职务犯罪情报评估机制完善论
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:On the Perfection of the Evaluation Mechanism of Duty Crime Intelligence under the Supervision System Reform
  • 作者:赵祖斌
  • 英文作者:Zhao Zubin;Law School, Wuhan University;
  • 关键词:监察体制改革 ; 职务犯罪 ; 情报评估 ; 设定标准 ; 优化流程
  • 英文关键词:supervision system reform;;duty crime;;intelligence evaluation;;setting standards;;process optimization
  • 中文刊名:QBZZ
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Intelligence
  • 机构:武汉大学法学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-22 13:34
  • 出版单位:情报杂志
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:QBZZ201907008
  • 页数:6
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:61-1167/G3
  • 分类号:46-50+154
摘要
[目的/意义]监察体制改革对职务犯罪情报质量提出了更高的要求,情报评估越发重要,但是现阶职务犯罪情报评估机制的不足已经制约了职务犯罪调查的质量和效率。因此,探讨如何完善职务犯罪情报评估机制既可以提高职务犯罪情报评估质量,又为我国情报评估机制的完善带来了契机。[方法/过程]在梳理文献的基础上分析当下职务犯罪情报评估机制的现状,通过对比论证的方法阐述了职务犯罪情报评估的含义、意义,职务犯罪情报评估机制的嬗变及存在的问题。[结果/结论]为适应监察体制改革,提高职务犯罪调查质效,有必要从构建专业化评估机构、加强评估技术力量建设、设定科学评估标准、优化评估流程等方面完善职务犯罪情报评估机制。
        [Purpose/Significance]The reform of the supervision system advances higher requirements for the quality of duty crime intelligence, and the evaluation of intelligence becomes more and more important. However, the imperfect present evaluation mechanism of duty crime intelligence has restricted the quality and efficiency of duty crime investigation. This issue has not received enough attention. Therefore, exploring how to improve the duty crime intelligence evaluation mechanism can not only improve the quality of duty crime intelligence assessment, but also bring opportunities to optimize China's intelligence assessment system.[Method/Process]On the basis of combing the literature, this paper analyzes the current situation of the intelligence evaluation mechanism of duty crimes, and expounds the meaning and significance of duty crime intelligence evaluation, the evolution of the evaluation mechanism and the existing problems through comparative argumentation.[Result/Conclusion]In order to adapt to the reform of the supervision system and improve the quality of duty crime investigation, it is necessary to improve the duty crime intelligence evaluation mechanism from the aspects of constructing professional duty crime evaluation agencies, strengthening the intelligence evaluation technology, setting scientific evaluation standards, and optimizing the evaluation process.
引文
[1] 高金虎.中西情报思想史[M].北京:金城出版社,2016:38.
    [2] 吕雪梅,燕京宏.香港犯罪情报评估制度评析及其借鉴[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2007(1):42-46.
    [3] 李亦农.犯罪情报学[M].北京:北京出版社,2003:13.
    [4] 尚宏烁.基层公安机关情报搜集中的情报评估模型研究[J].邢台学院学报,2019(1):115-119.
    [5] 谢永进,冼国胜.香港刑事情报评估机制在边防情报评估中的借鉴[J].湖北警官学院学报,2015(7):29-31.
    [6] 宁玲玲.职务犯罪举报线索成案率的提高对策[J].山西省政法管理干部学院学报,2012(3):60-62.
    [7] 宋历然.职务犯罪举报线索管理探究[N].民主与法制时报,2015-04-30(007).
    [8] 杨学泉.情报评估与测度[J].情报杂志,1999,28(6):16-17,23.
    [9] 陈樱.论战略情报评估[J].情报杂志,2015,34(9):6-8,53.
    [10] 吕雪梅.中英犯罪情报运行模式比较研究[J].山东警察学院学报,2009(4):96-102.
    [11] 杜倩博.监察委员会内部机构设置与运行机制:流程导向的组织变革[J].中共中央党校学报,2018(4):55-64.
    [12] 蒋勇.监察体制改革背景下职务犯罪情报信息运转机制研究[J].江西警察学院学报,2018(5):26-30.
    [13] 潘万贵,徐婉飞.构建职务犯罪情报分析机制[J].人民检察,2012(2):78-79.
    [14] 朱胜华,吴素莹,张力.职务犯罪侦查线索拓展实证研究——以S区人民检察院为分析样本[J].净月学刊,2016(6):46-52.
    [15] 鲍勃·莫尔豪斯.21世纪犯罪情报:公共安全从业者指南[M].北京:金城出版社,2017.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700