摘要
目的:观察联合用药治疗外感高热的疗效。方法:治疗组42例给予联合用药治疗,对照组40例给予单纯治疗,两组均7天为一疗程,用药2个疗程后判定疗效。结果:治疗组总有效率为80.95%,明显高于对照组50.0%,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:联合用药治疗外感高热的疗效肯定,可有效缩短病程,安全可靠。
Objective: To observe the curative effect of combination treatment of high fever. Method: 42 cases in the treatment group were given combination drug therapy, control group was treated with simple treatment, the two groups were 7 days to 1 course of treatment, to judge the curative effect of treatment after 2 courses. Result: The total effective rate of the treatment group was 80.95%, which was significantly higher than 50.0% of the control group, the difference was significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: The therapeutic effect of combined therapy in the treatment of exogenous high fever certainly, can effectively shorten the course of disease, safe and reliable.
引文
[1]陈灏珠.实用内科学[M].第12版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:309-310.
[2]江英,朱绿绮,李丰,等.布洛芬混悬液治疗小儿急性感染伴高热临床观察[J].临床儿科杂志,2003,21(5):308-309.
[3]王鲁群,杨玉萍,武翠萍,等.中枢性高热降温方法的比较[J].现代护理,2001,7(7):3-5.
[4]管桦桦,黄心洁,李赛美.肺胃相关性发挥[J].中医药学报,2008,36(3):72-76.
[5]袁利群,贡志刚,兰青.血管腔内降温新技术在重症颅脑外伤合并高热患者中的初步应用[J].中国医学创新,2011,8(8):8-10.
[6]尚红.健儿防惊汤预防小儿高热惊厥复发的研究[J].中国医学创新,2011,8(34):11-13.
[7]冼建平,关良劲,找海娴.清开灵治疗急性上呼吸道感染高热疗效观察54例[J].中国医药指南,2010,8(16):35-37.
[8]马学梅,史美慧.喜炎平、清开灵、病毒唑对上呼吸道感染患儿退热效果的比较[J].中国儿科杂志,2009,5(3):17-18.
[9]卢竟.全身炎症反应综合征与急性肺损伤及多器官障碍综合征的相互关系与区别[J].中国实用儿科杂志,1999,14(12):709-710.
[10]范昕,刘锦森.清开灵注射液治疗急性上呼吸道感染的疗效观察[J].中国药房,2011,22(8):701-702.
[11]马荣,杨秀婕,王颖辉,等.加味银翘散治疗外感热病(上呼吸道感染)临床观察[J].中医药信息,2010,27(3):89.
[12]田洪敏,王忠鹏.清开灵注射液的临床应用新进展[J].中国保健,2007,15(21):56-57.
[13]刘晓冬,曹慧玲.痰热清与清开灵辅助治疗重症肺炎的疗效观察[J].中国药房,2010,21(3):253-254.
[14]何子强.高热急证中医治疗的优势与不足[J].山东中医杂志,1995,14(5):235.
[15]朱崇杰.酒精擦浴在婴幼儿高热护理中的体会[J].中国医学创新,2012,9(26):52-53.