常规牵引联合颈部康复操训练治疗老年颈型颈椎病患者的疗效
|
摘要
目的探讨颈部康复训练操联合常规牵引治疗老年颈型颈椎病的疗效。方法选取68例于2015年5月—2016年5月期间该院接收的老年颈型颈椎病患者,随机分为对照组(常规牵引治疗)与实验组(颈部康复训练操联合常规牵引治疗),观察两组疗效。结果实验组较对照组临床有效率显著要高(P<0.05),分别为94.1%、64.7%;治疗后,两组CASCS评分、BBS评分、Barthel指数均升高,而实验组升高幅度更显著(P<0.05),治疗后实验组上述指标分别为(77.6±7.8)分、(78.6±6.6)分、(47.3±8.5)分,而对照组分别为(71.9±5.3)分、(57.3±6.4)分、(43.2±5.6)分。结论颈部康复操训练联合常规牵引治疗老年颈型颈椎病患者可取得显著疗效,具有推广价值。
Objective To study the clinical effect of rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction in elderly patients with cervical spondylopathy. Methods 68 elderly patients with cervical spondylopathy treated from May 2015 to May 2016 in our hospital were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The control group adopted the conventional traction; the test group adopted the rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction. The clinical efficacy for two groups was observed. Results The clinical effective rate of test group was significantly higher than that of control group(P <0.05)94.1% VS 64.7%; after treatment, the points of CASCS, BBS and Barthel index for test group were even higher than that of control group(P <0.05). After treatment, the indexes of the experimental group were(77.6 ±7.8)points,(78.6 ±6.6)points,(47.3 ±8.5)points, and the control group(71.9 ±5.3)points,(57.3 ±6.4)points,(43.2 ±5.6)points. Conclusion The rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction has an obvious effect in elderly patients with cervical spondylopathy. It is worthy of promotion.
Objective To study the clinical effect of rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction in elderly patients with cervical spondylopathy. Methods 68 elderly patients with cervical spondylopathy treated from May 2015 to May 2016 in our hospital were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The control group adopted the conventional traction; the test group adopted the rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction. The clinical efficacy for two groups was observed. Results The clinical effective rate of test group was significantly higher than that of control group(P <0.05)94.1% VS 64.7%; after treatment, the points of CASCS, BBS and Barthel index for test group were even higher than that of control group(P <0.05). After treatment, the indexes of the experimental group were(77.6 ±7.8)points,(78.6 ±6.6)points,(47.3 ±8.5)points, and the control group(71.9 ±5.3)points,(57.3 ±6.4)points,(43.2 ±5.6)points. Conclusion The rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction has an obvious effect in elderly patients with cervical spondylopathy. It is worthy of promotion.
引文
[1]张纳新.颈部康复操训练治疗颈型颈椎病患者的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2011,33(1):68-69.
[2]沈维青,刘斌,王子林,等.常规牵引联合颈部康复操训练治疗老年颈型颈椎病患者的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2013,33(24):6314-6316.
[3]徐俐,林颖.颈部按摩操应用于椎动脉型颈椎病患者的康复效果[J].上海护理,2013,13(6):22-24.
[4]郭小红,陈彬.运动康复疗法对社区颈椎病患者的效果分析[J].医学综述,2013,19(9):1714-1715.
[5]沈彤,尹伦辉,章瑛,等.软组织微创配合牵引下整脊对神经根型颈椎病的镇痛止麻效果[J].中国临床保健杂志,2013,16(3):260-262.
[6]胡少俊,毛筝,汤合杰,等.颈椎康复操对不同类型颈椎病患者康复训练效果的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2014,14(20):3935-3937,3976.
[7]谢红梅,杨媛媛,苏荣锦,等.中药烫疗加推拿对神经根型颈椎病的治疗及康复护理[J].内蒙古中医药,2012,31(22):133-134.
[8]王勇军,杜金刚,孙长城,等.脉冲矫正技术治疗颈型颈椎病的临床效果观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,2013,28(9):849-851.
[9]毛桂华,马轩,姬伟强,等.曲度牵引结合中频治疗仪治疗颈型颈椎病50例[J].河南中医,2016,36(2):338-339.
[10]周贤华,项娟萍,叶娜莎,等.微针刀结合动态牵引治疗颈型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2012,24(4):61-62.
[2]沈维青,刘斌,王子林,等.常规牵引联合颈部康复操训练治疗老年颈型颈椎病患者的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2013,33(24):6314-6316.
[3]徐俐,林颖.颈部按摩操应用于椎动脉型颈椎病患者的康复效果[J].上海护理,2013,13(6):22-24.
[4]郭小红,陈彬.运动康复疗法对社区颈椎病患者的效果分析[J].医学综述,2013,19(9):1714-1715.
[5]沈彤,尹伦辉,章瑛,等.软组织微创配合牵引下整脊对神经根型颈椎病的镇痛止麻效果[J].中国临床保健杂志,2013,16(3):260-262.
[6]胡少俊,毛筝,汤合杰,等.颈椎康复操对不同类型颈椎病患者康复训练效果的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2014,14(20):3935-3937,3976.
[7]谢红梅,杨媛媛,苏荣锦,等.中药烫疗加推拿对神经根型颈椎病的治疗及康复护理[J].内蒙古中医药,2012,31(22):133-134.
[8]王勇军,杜金刚,孙长城,等.脉冲矫正技术治疗颈型颈椎病的临床效果观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,2013,28(9):849-851.
[9]毛桂华,马轩,姬伟强,等.曲度牵引结合中频治疗仪治疗颈型颈椎病50例[J].河南中医,2016,36(2):338-339.
[10]周贤华,项娟萍,叶娜莎,等.微针刀结合动态牵引治疗颈型颈椎病的疗效观察[J].中医正骨,2012,24(4):61-62.