我国医学期刊编辑对医学研究报告规范的认知度
|
摘要
【目的】了解我国医学期刊编辑对医学研究报告规范的整体认知情况及实践中存在的问题,探索解决对策。【方法】2018年5—9月,采用问卷调查形式,通过微信、QQ等平台对国内医学期刊编辑发放网络问卷,分析医学期刊编辑对医学研究报告规范的认知差别。【结果】288名参与调查的医学编辑中,全部知晓、均不知晓、虽然知晓但从未在工作中应用过5种国际医学研究报告规范的比例分别为4.5%、29.9%、32.7%;《生物医学期刊投稿统一要求》和CONSORT声明的知晓率、应用率、认可度均显著高于其他3种医学研究报告规范。88.1%的医学期刊编辑认为在"稿约"或"作者须知"中列出医学研究报告规范对提高医学论文质量具有帮助,99.0%的医学期刊编辑认为医学研究报告规范对本职工作非常或比较重要,且88.2%的医学期刊编辑表示非常或比较希望获得相关知识的系统培训。64.9%的医学期刊编辑将期刊协会或编辑学会等举办的专题讲座或培训课程作为系统学习的首要途径。【结论】我国医学期刊编辑对国际医学研究报告规范的知晓率和应用率普遍偏低,但对系统培训需求较高,期刊管理部门、学会及社会团体均应重视医学期刊编辑的重要作用,通过开展与医学研究报告规范相关的教育培训活动,提高医学期刊编辑的认知度。
[Purposes] This paper aims to investigate the overall cognition degree of the guidelines on medical research reports for editors of Chinese medical journals and the problems in their editing practice,so as to explore the corresponding countermeasures.[Methods] From May to September in 2018,an online questionnaire was distributed to domestic medical journal editors through WeChat and QQ,and their cognitive differences were analyzed. [Findings] Among 288 medical journal editors who participated in the survey,4.5% of them know all the five reporting guidelines,29.9% of them do not know any of them,and 32.7% of them know about the reporting guidelines,but never apply any one in editing work. The awareness rate,application rate,and acceptance rate of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals and the CONSORT statement are significantly higher than the other three reporting guidelines. 88.1% of the subjects believe that listing the guidelines on medical research report in the authors' instruction of the journal can help to improve the quality of medical research reports,99.0% of them think the reporting guidelines are very important for their daily work,and 88.2% of them express great or comparative desire for systematic training on medical reporting guideline. 64.9% of them prefer the lectures or training courses held by schools,institutions,and associations as the primary form of receiving education compared to the other three options. [Conclusions] Chinese editors of medical journals are lack of knowledge in the guidelines on medical research reports with insufficient utilities in their practice. However,they have strong demands to learn them through systematic training programs. The journal management department,society,and social organization should value the role of medical editors. Training lessons about the reporting guidelines should be carried out for the purpose of facilitating their overall perception.
[Purposes] This paper aims to investigate the overall cognition degree of the guidelines on medical research reports for editors of Chinese medical journals and the problems in their editing practice,so as to explore the corresponding countermeasures.[Methods] From May to September in 2018,an online questionnaire was distributed to domestic medical journal editors through WeChat and QQ,and their cognitive differences were analyzed. [Findings] Among 288 medical journal editors who participated in the survey,4.5% of them know all the five reporting guidelines,29.9% of them do not know any of them,and 32.7% of them know about the reporting guidelines,but never apply any one in editing work. The awareness rate,application rate,and acceptance rate of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals and the CONSORT statement are significantly higher than the other three reporting guidelines. 88.1% of the subjects believe that listing the guidelines on medical research report in the authors' instruction of the journal can help to improve the quality of medical research reports,99.0% of them think the reporting guidelines are very important for their daily work,and 88.2% of them express great or comparative desire for systematic training on medical reporting guideline. 64.9% of them prefer the lectures or training courses held by schools,institutions,and associations as the primary form of receiving education compared to the other three options. [Conclusions] Chinese editors of medical journals are lack of knowledge in the guidelines on medical research reports with insufficient utilities in their practice. However,they have strong demands to learn them through systematic training programs. The journal management department,society,and social organization should value the role of medical editors. Training lessons about the reporting guidelines should be carried out for the purpose of facilitating their overall perception.
引文
[1]Cronin P,Rawson J V,Heilbrun M E,et al.How to report a research study[J].Academic Radiology,2014,21(9):1088-1116.
[2]Reporting guidelines for main studytypes[EB/OL].[2018-11-01].http:∥www.equator-network.org/.
[3]International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals(excerpts)[J].Journal of the American College of Dentists,2014,81:23-30.
[4]Schulz K F,Altman D G,Moher D.CONSORT 2010 statement:Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials[J].International Journal of Surgery,2011,9(8):672-677.
[5]Bossuyt P M,Reitsma J B,Bruns D E,et al.STARD 2015:An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies[J].British Medical Journal,2015,351:h5527.
[6]von Elm E,Altman D G,Egger M,et al.The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology(STROBE)statement:Guidelines for reporting observational studies[J].International Journal of Surgery,2014,12(12):1495-1499.
[7]Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:The PRISMA statement[J].International Journal of Surgery,2010,8(5):336-341.
[8]姚俊英,王晶.向生物医学期刊投稿的统一要求(续二)(2007年10月更新)[J].中国医药生物技术,2008(3):237-240.
[9]汪谋岳.2010年新版CONSORT声明简介[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(2):309-310.
[10]朱一丹,李会娟,武阳丰.诊断准确性研究报告规范(STARD)2015介绍与解读[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(6):730-735.
[11]张珺,葛龙,赵晔,等.PRISMA系列报告规范简介[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(5):257-261.
[12]顾佳,石朝云,刘冰,等.STROBE声明:评价观察性研究报道质量的有效工具[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(42):3023-3024.
[13]孙凤.医学研究报告规范解读[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2015.
[14]胡晶,商洪才,张伯礼,等.CONSORT声明在中国医学期刊“稿约”中的应用[J].中国循证医学杂志,2009,9(1):80-85.
[15]Song T J,Leng H F,Zhong L L,et al.CONSORT in China:Past development and future direction[J].Trials,2015,16:243.
[16]栾嘉,徐迪雄,李高明.国内医学临床研究论文方法学论述问题分析及规范化建议[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(1):32-36.
[17]He J,Du L,Liu G J,et al.Quality assessment of reporting of randomization,allocation concealment,and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs:A review of 3159 RCTs identified from260 systematic reviews[J].Trials,2011,12:122-126.
[18]赵亚娜.中文期刊肿瘤骨转移动物实验研究的报告质量及病理学特征的现状分析[D].兰州:兰州大学,2017.
[19]于丹丹,谢雁鸣,廖星,等.《中国中药杂志》发表随机对照试验方法学和报告质量评价研究[J].中国中药杂志,2018,43(4):833-839.
[20]尚淑贤,颜艳,吴晓初.中文临床医学期刊随机对照临床试验摘要报告质量评估[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(12):1121-1127.
[21]中国科学技术协会.中国科技期刊发展蓝皮书(2017)[M].北京:科学出版社,2017:5-9.
[22]胡苗.编辑数量与效率中美编辑收入和数量[J].出版经济,2005(1):78-79.
[23]吴泰相,李幼平,郑尚维,等.推动我国医学期刊发表伦理发展的联合声明[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(12):1351-1353.
[24]Turner L,Shamseer L,Altman D G,et al.Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals?ACochrane review[J].Systematic Reviews,2012,1:60.
[25]Hasbah9eci M,Ba?ak F,Uysal?.Evaluation of reporting quality of the 2010 and 2012 National Surgical Congress oral presentations by CONSORT,STROBE and Timmer criteria[J].Turkish Journal of Surgery,2014,30(3):138-146.
[26]Peters J P M,Hooft L,Grolman W,et al.Reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of otorhinolaryngologic articles based on the PRISMA statement[J].PLo S ONE,2015,10(8):e0136540.
[27]许玉艳,刘欢,张晓琴.科技期刊编辑审读加工方法新思考[J].编辑学报,2017,29(2):122-125.
[28]Peng X X,Feng G S,Liu T Y,et al.The content of statistical requirements for authors in biomedical research journals[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2016,129(20):2491-2496.
[2]Reporting guidelines for main studytypes[EB/OL].[2018-11-01].http:∥www.equator-network.org/.
[3]International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals(excerpts)[J].Journal of the American College of Dentists,2014,81:23-30.
[4]Schulz K F,Altman D G,Moher D.CONSORT 2010 statement:Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials[J].International Journal of Surgery,2011,9(8):672-677.
[5]Bossuyt P M,Reitsma J B,Bruns D E,et al.STARD 2015:An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies[J].British Medical Journal,2015,351:h5527.
[6]von Elm E,Altman D G,Egger M,et al.The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology(STROBE)statement:Guidelines for reporting observational studies[J].International Journal of Surgery,2014,12(12):1495-1499.
[7]Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:The PRISMA statement[J].International Journal of Surgery,2010,8(5):336-341.
[8]姚俊英,王晶.向生物医学期刊投稿的统一要求(续二)(2007年10月更新)[J].中国医药生物技术,2008(3):237-240.
[9]汪谋岳.2010年新版CONSORT声明简介[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(2):309-310.
[10]朱一丹,李会娟,武阳丰.诊断准确性研究报告规范(STARD)2015介绍与解读[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(6):730-735.
[11]张珺,葛龙,赵晔,等.PRISMA系列报告规范简介[J].中国药物评价,2015,32(5):257-261.
[12]顾佳,石朝云,刘冰,等.STROBE声明:评价观察性研究报道质量的有效工具[J].中华医学杂志,2012,92(42):3023-3024.
[13]孙凤.医学研究报告规范解读[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2015.
[14]胡晶,商洪才,张伯礼,等.CONSORT声明在中国医学期刊“稿约”中的应用[J].中国循证医学杂志,2009,9(1):80-85.
[15]Song T J,Leng H F,Zhong L L,et al.CONSORT in China:Past development and future direction[J].Trials,2015,16:243.
[16]栾嘉,徐迪雄,李高明.国内医学临床研究论文方法学论述问题分析及规范化建议[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,29(1):32-36.
[17]He J,Du L,Liu G J,et al.Quality assessment of reporting of randomization,allocation concealment,and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs:A review of 3159 RCTs identified from260 systematic reviews[J].Trials,2011,12:122-126.
[18]赵亚娜.中文期刊肿瘤骨转移动物实验研究的报告质量及病理学特征的现状分析[D].兰州:兰州大学,2017.
[19]于丹丹,谢雁鸣,廖星,等.《中国中药杂志》发表随机对照试验方法学和报告质量评价研究[J].中国中药杂志,2018,43(4):833-839.
[20]尚淑贤,颜艳,吴晓初.中文临床医学期刊随机对照临床试验摘要报告质量评估[J].中国科技期刊研究,2017,28(12):1121-1127.
[21]中国科学技术协会.中国科技期刊发展蓝皮书(2017)[M].北京:科学出版社,2017:5-9.
[22]胡苗.编辑数量与效率中美编辑收入和数量[J].出版经济,2005(1):78-79.
[23]吴泰相,李幼平,郑尚维,等.推动我国医学期刊发表伦理发展的联合声明[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(12):1351-1353.
[24]Turner L,Shamseer L,Altman D G,et al.Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals?ACochrane review[J].Systematic Reviews,2012,1:60.
[25]Hasbah9eci M,Ba?ak F,Uysal?.Evaluation of reporting quality of the 2010 and 2012 National Surgical Congress oral presentations by CONSORT,STROBE and Timmer criteria[J].Turkish Journal of Surgery,2014,30(3):138-146.
[26]Peters J P M,Hooft L,Grolman W,et al.Reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of otorhinolaryngologic articles based on the PRISMA statement[J].PLo S ONE,2015,10(8):e0136540.
[27]许玉艳,刘欢,张晓琴.科技期刊编辑审读加工方法新思考[J].编辑学报,2017,29(2):122-125.
[28]Peng X X,Feng G S,Liu T Y,et al.The content of statistical requirements for authors in biomedical research journals[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2016,129(20):2491-2496.