幸福感测量指标体系的评价与展望
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Measuring Indicators for Subject Well-Being:Evaluation and Prospects
  • 作者:刘蕾 ; 孙五俊 ; 姜媛 ; 方平
  • 英文作者:LIU Lei;SUN Wujun;JIANG Yuan;FANG Ping;College of Psychology,Capital Normal University;College of Education,Henan Normal University;College of Psychology,Beijing Sport University;
  • 关键词:幸福感 ; 测量工具 ; 指标体系 ; 评价
  • 英文关键词:well-being;;measuring tool;;indicators;;evaluation
  • 中文刊名:ZDTJ
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Special Education
  • 机构:首都师范大学心理学院;河南师范大学教育学院;北京体育大学心理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:中国特殊教育
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.224
  • 基金:国家社会科学基金教育学一般课题“情绪预测偏差与决策关系的发展特点及其机制研究”(BBA160046)阶段性成果
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZDTJ201902011
  • 页数:8
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-3826/G4
  • 分类号:68-75
摘要
目的:厘清现有国内外幸福感测量工具中的结构维度,为编制符合我国国情的幸福感测量工具提供科学依据。方法:系统检索4个国内外数据库,从459项幸福感测量工具研究中筛选,有25项符合既定纳入标准。使用五项编码指导对这些测量工具进行评估,并对其所测维度进行内容分析。结果:内容分析明确了19个维度。这些工具包含最普遍的维度为积极关系、身心状况、生活满意。这些维度在所有测量工具中占比分别为84.2%、57.9%、52.6%。结论:幸福感测量指标体系是多维的,且各维度重要性不同。未来幸福感指标体系构建应立足我国实际,加强理论构建,推进维度的整合与权重分析。
        This study aims to clarify the structural dimensions of the existing domestic and foreign measuring tools for subject well-being, and offer a scientific base for the development of the measuring tools in line with China's national conditions. The authors, based on systematic evaluation, retrieved 4 relevant domestic and foreign databases, and found that 25 out of 459 measuring tools met the given criteria; they used 5 coding guidelines to evaluate the measuring tools, and analyzed the dimensions for measurement. The findings fixed 19 dimensions, among which positive relationships, physical and mental conditions, and life satisfaction were commonly used, accounting for 84.2%, 57.9%, and 52.6%, respectively. The authors conclude the following: The measuring indicators for subject well-being are multi-dimensional, and each is of different significance; and the future research should, based on China's national conditions, strengthen theoretical construction, and push forward the integration and weight analysis of the dimensions.
引文
1 Ryff C D. Happiness is everything, or is it? Exporations on the meaning of psychological Well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 57(6):1069-1081
    2 Kiefer R A. An integrative review of the concept of well-being. Holistic Nursing Practice, 2008, 22(5):244-252
    3 Campion J, Nurse J. A dynamic model for wellbeing. Australasian Psychiatry, 2007, 15(s1):S24-S28
    4 Suldo S M, Shaffer E J. Looking beyond psychopathology: The dual-factor model of mental health in youth. School Psychology Review, 2008, 37(37):52-68
    5 Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95(3):542-575
    6 Diener E, Emmons R A, Larsen R J, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, 49(1):71-75
    7 Ryan R M , Huta V , Deci E L . Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2008, 9(1):139-170
    8 Waterman A S . Two conceptions of happiness: contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 64(4):678-691
    9 Ryff C D . Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1995, 4(4):99-104
    10 Ryff C D , Singer B H . Best news yet on the six-factor model of well-being. Social Science Research, 2006, 35(4):1103-1119
    11 Disabato D J, Goodman F R, Kashdan T B, et al. Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 2016, 28(5):471-482
    12 Durayappah A. The 3P model: A general theory of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2011, 12(4):681-716
    13 Seligman M E P. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Policy, 2011, 471(7338):302-303
    14 Keyes C L M. Social Well-Being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1998, 61(2):121-140
    15 La Placa, V., McNaught, A., Knight, A. Discourse on wellbeing in research and Practice. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2013, 3,116-125
    16 苗元江, 朱晓红, 陈浩彬. 从理论到测量——幸福感心理结构研究发展. 徐州师范大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2009, 35(2):128-133
    17 Cooper, H. Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed., Vol. 2). Los Angeles: Sage,2010.56-68
    18 吉楠, 李幼穗. 《大学生主观幸福感量表》的编制. 心理与行为研究, 2006, 4(1):49-54
    19 邢占军, 黄立清. Ryff心理幸福感量表在我国城市居民中的试用研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2004, 12(3):231-233
    20 邢占军. 基于六省会城市居民的主观幸福感研究. 心理科学, 2008,(6):1484-1488
    21 苗元江, 高红英. 《综合幸福问卷》在老年人群中应用分析. 新余高专学报, 2008, 13(3):27-30
    22 卢会志. 跨群体主观幸福感模型研究. 青年学报, 2015,(3):64-70
    23 方王皓明, 苗元江, 梁小玲,等. 大学生实现幸福感初步研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2012, 20(9):1433-1435
    24 王薇. 大学生幸福感量表的编制与分析. 学周刊, 2011(28):16-17
    25 李建伟, 李娜, 聂玉玲,等. 中国研究生主观幸福感量表的编制.中国健康心理学杂志, 2007, 15(12):1064-1065
    26 Coffey J K, Wray-Lake L, Mashek D, et al. A multi-study examination of well-being theory in college and community samples. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2016, 17(1):187-211
    27 ?mer Faruk Simsek. An intentional model of emotional well-being: The development and initial validation of a measure of subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2011, 12(3):421-442
    28 Prilleltensky I, Dietz S, Prilleltensky O, et al. Assessing multidimensional well-being: development and validation of theI COPPE Scale. Journal of Community Psychology, 2015, 43(2):199-226
    29 Gomez R, Fisher J W. Domains of spiritual well-being and development and validation of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire. Personality & Individual Differences, 2003, 35(8):1975-1991
    30 Chan C H Y, Chan T H Y, Leung P P Y, et al. Rethinking well-being in terms of affliction and equanimity: Development of a Holistic Well-Being Scale. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 2014, 23(3-4):289-308
    31 Kinderman P, Schwannauer M, Pontin E, et al. The development and validation of a general measure of well-being: the BBC well-being scale. Quality of Life Research, 2011, 20(7):1035-1042
    32 Unterrainer H-F, Nelson O, Collicutt J, et al. The English version of the multidimensional inventory for religious/spiritual well-being (MI-RSWB-E): First results from British college students. Religions,2012,3,588-599
    33 Keyes CL, Wissing M, Potgieter JP, et al. Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 2010, 15(3):181-192
    34 Hills P, Argyle M. The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality & Individual Differences, 2002, 33(7):1073-1082
    35 Schwartz S J. The Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being: Psychometric properties, demographic comparisons, and evidence of validity. Journal of Positive Psychology, 2010, 5(1):41-61
    36 Gatt J M, Burton K L O, Schofield P R, et al. The heritability of mental health and wellbeing defined using COMPAS-W, a new composite measure of wellbeing. Psychiatry Research, 2014, 219(1):204-213
    37 Campbell A. Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 1976, 31(2):117-124
    38 Fazio A F. A concurrent validational study of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule. Vital Health Stat, 1977, 73(73):1-53
    39 Bradburn N M. The structure of psychological well-being. Social Service Review, 1969, 44(3):71-89
    40 Sears L E, Agrawal S, Sidney J A, et al. The Well-Being 5: Development and validation of a diagnostic instrument to improve population well-being. Population Health Management, 2014, 17(6):357-65
    41 孙健敏, 李秀凤, 林丛丛. 工作幸福感的概念演进与测量.中国人力资源开发, 2016(13):38-47
    42 Hitokoto H, Uchida Y. Interdependent Happiness: Theoretical Importance and Measurement Validity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2015, 16(1):211-239
    43 刘利.幸福感评价体系的缺陷及其未来研究方向. 成都大学学报:社会科学版. 2015, 2015(5):1-5

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700