农地整理后期不同管护方式的满意度及其影响因素研究——基于滁州市土地整理项目的实证分析
|
摘要
通过对安徽滁州土地整治后期管护的问卷调查,运用Ordered Probit模型分析了村委会管护、农户承包管护、专业合作社管护三种不同管护方式下农户满意度及其影响因素。研究表明,农户对土地整治后期管护的满意度是合作社管护模式下最高,其次是农户承包管护模式,村委会管护模式农户的满意度最低。显著影响土地整治后期管护农户满意度的因素主要表现为承包耕地面积、农业收入占家庭收入比、后期管护宣传强度、维修及时性、损毁程度、管护资金投入度和管护方式,而农户的个体特征对农户满意度没有显著影响。在不同管护模式下,土地整治后期管护农户满意度的影响因素存在差异。
Through the questionnaire survey on management and protection in the later stage of land remediation in Chuzhou,Anhui Province,the Ordered Probit model is used to analyze the satisfaction degree of farmer and impact factors under the three different management methods:village committee management,individual contract management, and professional cooperative management and protection.The research showed that farmers' satisfaction with management and protection in the later stage of land remediation is the highest under the model of cooperative management and protection,followed by the mode of contracted management of farmers,and the satisfaction of villagers in the management mode of village committees is the lowest.The factors that significantly affected the satisfaction of farmer households in the later stages of land remediation were mainly contracted arable land area,agricultural income as a percentage of household income,propaganda intensity of management and protection in the later period,maintenance timeliness,degree of damage,investment in management and conservation funds,and management methods.The individual characteristics of farmers have no significant effect on farmers' satisfaction.Under different modes of management and protection,there are differences in the factors affecting the satisfaction of farmers in the later stage of land remediation.
Through the questionnaire survey on management and protection in the later stage of land remediation in Chuzhou,Anhui Province,the Ordered Probit model is used to analyze the satisfaction degree of farmer and impact factors under the three different management methods:village committee management,individual contract management, and professional cooperative management and protection.The research showed that farmers' satisfaction with management and protection in the later stage of land remediation is the highest under the model of cooperative management and protection,followed by the mode of contracted management of farmers,and the satisfaction of villagers in the management mode of village committees is the lowest.The factors that significantly affected the satisfaction of farmer households in the later stages of land remediation were mainly contracted arable land area,agricultural income as a percentage of household income,propaganda intensity of management and protection in the later period,maintenance timeliness,degree of damage,investment in management and conservation funds,and management methods.The individual characteristics of farmers have no significant effect on farmers' satisfaction.Under different modes of management and protection,there are differences in the factors affecting the satisfaction of farmers in the later stage of land remediation.
引文
[1]肖桢,张科.浅谈湖南省土地开发整理项目后期管护工作[J].国土资源导刊,2006,3(13):26-27.
[2]于冠营,齐卉青,樊智等.东营市土地开发整理项目实施效果评价及工程后期管护调研报告[J].山东国土资源,2006,3(13):8-12.
[3]汪文雄,杨钢桥,李进涛.农地整理项目后期管护效率的影响因素实证研究[J].资源科学,2010,32(6):1169-1176.
[4]汪文雄,李敏,杨钢桥等.标杆管理视角下农地整治项目后期管护效率测度研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,14(4):75-85.
[5]胡珍,杨钢桥,汪文雄等.基于农户视角的土地整理项目后期管护绩效评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):198-205.
[6]李养兵,王凯,王丽.基于物元可拓模型的农地整理后期管护绩效评价[J].国土资源科技管理,2017,34(1):57-64.
[7]李金玉,杨钢桥,赵微等.农地整治项目建后管护模式的绩效差异及其原因分析[J].资源科学,2016,38(9):1711-1722.
[8]赵微,杨钢桥,江颖慧.公共部门绩效管理视角下农地整理管护绩效的影响因素研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(4):119-127.
[9]卫龙宝,张菲.农村基层治理满意程度及其影响因素分析——基于公共物品供给的微观视角[J].中国农村经济,2012(6):85-96.
[10]朱玉春,唐娟莉,郑英宁.欠发达地区农村公共服务满意度及其影响因素分析——基于西北五省1478户农户的调查[J].中国人口科学,2010,(2):82-91.
[11]王昕,陆迁.农村小型水利设施管护方式与农户满意度——基于泾惠渠灌区811户农户数据的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)2015,15(1):51-60.
[12]汪文雄,杨钢桥,李进涛.农户参与农地整理项目后期管护意愿的影响因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(3):42-48.
[13]李养兵,王凯,王丽.农户参与土地整治后期管护行为的影响因素研究[J].安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(3):16-20.
[2]于冠营,齐卉青,樊智等.东营市土地开发整理项目实施效果评价及工程后期管护调研报告[J].山东国土资源,2006,3(13):8-12.
[3]汪文雄,杨钢桥,李进涛.农地整理项目后期管护效率的影响因素实证研究[J].资源科学,2010,32(6):1169-1176.
[4]汪文雄,李敏,杨钢桥等.标杆管理视角下农地整治项目后期管护效率测度研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2014,14(4):75-85.
[5]胡珍,杨钢桥,汪文雄等.基于农户视角的土地整理项目后期管护绩效评价[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(2):198-205.
[6]李养兵,王凯,王丽.基于物元可拓模型的农地整理后期管护绩效评价[J].国土资源科技管理,2017,34(1):57-64.
[7]李金玉,杨钢桥,赵微等.农地整治项目建后管护模式的绩效差异及其原因分析[J].资源科学,2016,38(9):1711-1722.
[8]赵微,杨钢桥,江颖慧.公共部门绩效管理视角下农地整理管护绩效的影响因素研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(4):119-127.
[9]卫龙宝,张菲.农村基层治理满意程度及其影响因素分析——基于公共物品供给的微观视角[J].中国农村经济,2012(6):85-96.
[10]朱玉春,唐娟莉,郑英宁.欠发达地区农村公共服务满意度及其影响因素分析——基于西北五省1478户农户的调查[J].中国人口科学,2010,(2):82-91.
[11]王昕,陆迁.农村小型水利设施管护方式与农户满意度——基于泾惠渠灌区811户农户数据的实证分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)2015,15(1):51-60.
[12]汪文雄,杨钢桥,李进涛.农户参与农地整理项目后期管护意愿的影响因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2010,24(3):42-48.
[13]李养兵,王凯,王丽.农户参与土地整治后期管护行为的影响因素研究[J].安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(3):16-20.