2015年防城港近岸海域浮游桡足类群落结构的季节变化
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Seasonal Variations of Planktonic Copepods Community Structure in Fangchenggang Coastal Waters in 2015
  • 作者:张静 ; 严武科 ; 吕少梁 ; 曾嘉维 ; 王学锋
  • 英文作者:ZHANG Jing;YAN Wu-ke;Lü Shao-liang;ZENG Jia-wei;WANG Xue-feng;College of Fisheries, Guangdong Ocean University;
  • 关键词:桡足类 ; 群落格局 ; 浮游动物 ; 冗余分析
  • 英文关键词:planktonic copepods;;community pattern;;zooplankton;;redundancy analysis
  • 中文刊名:SHDX
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Guangdong Ocean University
  • 机构:广东海洋大学水产学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-15
  • 出版单位:广东海洋大学学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.38
  • 基金:公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201403008);; 2017年“攀登计划”广东省大学生科技创新培育专项资金(pdjh2017b0239);; 广东海洋大学水产学院第三届优秀本科生进实验室项目(scxy2016052454)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SHDX201806004
  • 页数:11
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:44-1635/N
  • 分类号:21-31
摘要
【目的】研究防城港近岸海域浮游桡足类的群落格局及其环境适应性,为浮游动物生态学、渔业栖息地适宜性评价提供参考依据。【方法】根据2015年4个季度的防城港近岸海域16个站位的浮游桡足类调查结果,运用群落特征参数、聚类分析、冗余分析方法分析了其种类组成、空间格局及其对环境因子的适应性。【结果】1)调查海域共鉴定浮游桡足类81种,隶属于5目23科34属,以长腹剑水蚤属种类数最多(7种);各站位Shannon-Wiener多样性指数(H')均值为2.19±0.38。桡足类丰度的季节均值依次为从高到低依次为夏季(222.9±140.3)个/m3>春季(113.0±150.7)个/m3>秋季(87.4±40.5)个/m3>冬季(26.0±48.8)个/m3;2)桡足类的季节更替率均值为(73.91±17.76)%,以春/夏季更替率最高(84.31%),夏/秋最低(47.37%),表现为以瘦尾胸刺水蚤(Centropages tenuiremis)、锥形宽水蚤(Temora turbinata)、亚强次真哲水蚤(Eucalanus subcrassus)及微刺哲水蚤(Canthocalanuspauper)等优势种丰度的季节变化;3)浮游桡足类群落格局在空间上大致可划分为沿岸组、离岸组和近岸组共3个类群(P=0.001,ANOSIM),大体分别处于10 m以浅、10 m、20 m三个水深范围,各组的代表种亦是该海域季节性优势种,但在相对丰度和出现频率上组间差异显著;4)冗余分析表明,7个环境因子(水深、透明度、水温、溶解氧、盐度、pH和叶绿素a)对该海域浮游桡足类群落格局季节变动的累积贡献率为(52.02±16.21)%,以叶绿素a和水温的作用最重要。【结论】浮游桡足类的群落格局及其季节变动受水深与环境因子影响较大,在关键渔业水域栖息地适宜性评价研究中值得关注。
        【Objective】This paper aims to identify the planktonic copepods community structures and its seasonal patterns driven by environmental factors, which are essential for both planktonic ecology and quantitative assessment of fish habitat suitability. 【Method】The zooplankton communities of 16 sites with environmental factors were censused during January, May, August and November of 2015 respectively in Fangchenggang coastal waters, northern of Beibu Gulf. The community structure of planktonic copepods and its relations with the environmental factors were analyzed using methods of clustering and Redundancy analysis(RDA).【Result】The planktonic copepods are represented by a total of 81 species belonging to 5 orders, 23 families and 34 genera, but most of them belong to the genus Oithona(with 7 species). The values of Shannon-Wiener diversity averaged 2.19±0.38 seasonally. The seasonal abundances of planktonic copepods decreased from summer, spring, fall to winter in sequence 242.4±158.6, 107.8±152.4, 85.1±41.5, 25.3±48.9 ind/m3, respectively. Secondly, the turnover rates of copepods averaged(73.91±17.76) % in seasons, with the highest rates of 84.31% from spring to summer, and the lowest rates of 47.37% from summer to fall. The seasonal succession of dominant species had been observed, and the number of species was not much different, such as Centropages tenuiremis in summer, Temora turbinate in spring, Eucalanus subcrassus in autumn, and Canthocalanus pauper in winter, respectively. Thirdly, the community could be spatially divided into three groups significantly(P = 0.001, ANOSIM)), i.e. coastal group, inshore group, and offshore group, which were located in waters at the depths of less than 10 m, 10 m or so and 20 m, respectively. The representative species in every group were also the dominant species, but they varied significantly in abundances and occurrence frequencies between the groups. Finally, redundancy analysis showed that the environmental factors(water depth, transparency, sea surface temperature(t), dissolved oxygen, salinity and pH) explained(52.02±16.21) % variations of copepods community pattern, among which the chlorophyll a and T were the most important factors.【Conclusion】 It is important that the seasonal patterns of planktonic copepods and regulating factors such as water depth and environmental parameters should be integrated in assessing the suitability of key fish habitats.
引文
[1]HELLER N E,ZAVALETA E S.Biodiversity management in the face of climate change:A review of 22 years of recommendations[J].Biological Conservation,2009,142(1):14-32.
    [2]徐兆礼.中国近海浮游动物多样性研究的过去和未来[J].生物多样性,2011,19(6):635-645.
    [3]陈蕾,李超伦.海洋浮游生物的生态化学计量学研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(10):3047-3055.
    [4]BEAUGRAND G,REID P C,IBA?EZ F,et al.Reorganization of North Atlantic marine copepod biodiversity and climate[J].Science,2002,296(5573):1692-1694.
    [5]尹健强,黄良民,李开枝,等.南海西北部陆架区沿岸流和上升流对中华哲水蚤分布的影响[J].海洋学报(中文版),2013,35(2):143-153.
    [6]毕洪生,孙松,高尚武,等.渤海浮游动物群落生态特点II.桡足类数量分布及变动[J].生态学报,2001,21(2):177-185.
    [7]毕洪生,孙松,高尚武,等.渤海浮游动物群落生态特点Ⅰ.种类组成与群落结构[J].生态学报,2000,20(5):715-721.
    [8]徐兆礼,王荣,陈亚瞿.黄海南部及东海中小型浮游桡足类生态学研究Ⅰ.数量分布[J].水产学报,2003,27(z1):1-8.
    [9]朱延忠.夏?冬季北黄海大中型浮游动物群落生态学研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2008.
    [10]徐兆礼,蒋玫,晁敏,等.东海浮游桡足类的数量分布[J].水产学报,2003,27(3):258-264.
    [11]陈洪举.黄?东海浮游动物群落结构和多样性研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2010.
    [12]李纯厚,贾晓平,蔡文贵.南海北部浮游动物多样性研究[J].中国水产科学,2004,11(2):139-146.
    [13]HENSCHKE N,EVERETT J D,SUTHERS I M,et al.Zooplankton trophic niches respond to different water types of the western Tasman Sea:A stable isotope analysis[J].Deep Sea Research Part I:Oceanographic Research Papers,2015,104:1-8.
    [14]沈国英,黄凌风,郭丰,等.海洋生态学[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [15]KEISTER J E,BONNET D,CHIBA S,et al.Zooplankton population connections,community dynamics,and climate variability[J].ICES Journal of Marine Science,2012,69(3):347-350.
    [16]陈新军.渔业资源与渔场学[M].北京:海洋出版社,2014.
    [17]王荣,张鸿雁,王克,等.小型桡足类在海洋生态系统中的功能作用[J].海洋与湖沼,2002,33(5):453-460.
    [18]张才学,龚玉艳,孙省利,等.2010年夏季雷州半岛沿岸海域浮游动物群落结构特征[J].海洋学报(中文版),2014,36(4):91-99.
    [19]杜明敏,刘镇盛,王春生,等.中国近海浮游动物群落结构及季节变化[J].生态学报,2013,33(17):5407-5418.
    [20]王学锋,李纯厚,廖秀丽,等.北部湾浮游幼虫群落结构及其环境适应性分析[J].上海海洋大学学报,2010,19(4):529-534.
    [21]王学锋,李纯厚,贾晓平,等.北部湾海樽类的种类组成及分布[J].渔业现代化,2010,37(2):59-63.
    [22]农业部南海区渔政局.南海渔场作业图集[Z].广州:广东省地图出版社,1994.
    [23]国家海洋局专项办公室.海洋生物生态调查技术规程[S].北京:海洋出版社,2006.
    [24]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.海洋监测规范[S].北京:海洋出版社,2007.
    [25]刘瑞玉.中国海洋生物名录[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
    [26]张才学,龚玉艳,王学锋,等.湛江港湾浮游桡足类群落结构的季节变化和影响因素[J].生态学报,2011,31(23):7086-7096.
    [27]MCCUNE B,MEFFORD M J.PC-ORD.Multivariate analysis of ecological data.Version 7.03[DB/CD].Gleneden Beach,Oregon,USA:MjM Software,2016.
    [28]CLARKE K R,GORLEY R N.Primer V5:user manual/tutorial[DB/CD].Plymouth:Primer-E Ltd,2001.
    [29]CLARKE K R.Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure[J].Australian Journal of Ecology banner,1993,18(1):117-143.
    [30]吕少梁,王学锋,曾嘉维,等.防城港海域浮游植物群落结构及其环境适应性[J].南方水产科学,2017,13(4):17-25.
    [31]张云,马徐发,郭飞飞,等.湖北金沙河水库浮游植物群落结构及其与水环境因子的关系[J].湖泊科学,2015,27(5):902-910.
    [32]栾青彬,孙军,宋书群,等.长江口夏季浮游植物群落与环境因子的典范对应分析[J].植物生态学报,2007,31(3):445-450.
    [33]戴明,巩秀玉,刘华雪,等.2013年春季南沙海域不同水团中网采浮游植物群落特征[J].南方水产科学,2015,11(5):38-46.
    [34]曾嘉维,王学锋,吕少梁,等.北部湾冬?夏季浮游桡足类群落的结构特征及环境适应性[J].广东海洋大学学报,2016,36(6):59-64.
    [35]DIXON P.Vegan,a package of R functions for community ecology[J].Journal of Vegetation Science,2003,14(6):927-930.
    [36]赖江山,米湘成.基于Vegan软件包的生态学数据排序分析[C]//国际生物多样性计划中国委员会,中国科学院生命科学与生物技术局.第九届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集.北京:气象出版社,2010.
    [37]方丽娟,刘德富,张伟磊,等.三峡水库175 m蓄水前后香溪河库湾浮游植物的群落结构[J].水生态学杂志,2014,35(3):1-9.
    [38]姜胜,黄长江,陈善文,等.2000~2001年柘林湾浮游动物的群落结构及时空分布[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):828-840.
    [39]龚玉艳,陈作志,黄梓荣.广东沿岸不同海域浮游动物群落结构的比较分析[J].南方农业学报,2015,46(11):2026-2033.
    [40]杜飞雁,王雪辉,贾晓平,等.大亚湾海域浮游动物种类组成和优势种的季节变化[J].生态学报,2013,37(8):1213-1219.
    [41]李开枝,尹健强,黄良民,等.珠江口浮游桡足类的生态研究[J].生态科学,2007,26(2):97-102.
    [42]阙江龙,徐兆礼,孙鲁峰.北部湾西北部饵料浮游动物季节变化及其与鱼卵?仔稚鱼的关系[J].中国水产科学,2015,22(5):1027-1035.
    [43]方匡南,朱建平,姜叶飞.R数据分析:方法与案例详解[G].北京:电子工业出版社,2015:220-225.
    [44]徐兆礼,崔雪森,陈卫忠.东海浮游桡足类的种类组成及优势种[J].水产学报,2004,28(1):35-40.
    [45]王真良.大连湾水域浮游桡足类的分布[J].黄渤海海洋,1995,13(1):47-54.
    [46]张光涛.中华哲水蚤在南黄海的生殖策略研究[D].青岛:中科院研究生院(海洋研究所),2003.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700