甲磺草胺除草活性及对甘蔗的安全性研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Herbicidal Activity Evaluation of Sulfentrazone and Its Safety to Sugarcane
  • 作者:马永林 ; 马跃峰 ; 郭成林 ; 王彦辉 ; 黄辉晔 ; 覃建林
  • 英文作者:MA Yonglin;MA Yuefeng;GUO Chenglin;WANG Yanhui;HUANG Huiye;QIN Jianlin;Institute of Plant Protection,Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guangxi Key Laboratory for Biology of Crop Diseases and Insect Pests;
  • 关键词:甲磺草胺 ; 除草活性 ; 杀草谱 ; 甘蔗 ; 安全性
  • 英文关键词:sulfentrazone;;herbicidal activity;;weed control spectrum;;sugarcane;;safety
  • 中文刊名:RDZX
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops
  • 机构:广西农业科学院植物保护研究所/广西作物病虫害生物学重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-04-25
  • 出版单位:热带作物学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.40
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划项目(No.2016YFC1202101);; 广西农业科学院科技发展基金(农桂科2017M32);; 广西作物病虫害生物学重点实验室基金(No.17-259-47-ST-5)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:RDZX201904019
  • 页数:5
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:46-1019/S
  • 分类号:125-129
摘要
为明确甲磺草胺在蔗田的应用前景,采用温室盆栽法土壤处理对其杀草谱、除草活性及其对甘蔗的安全性进行了测定。结果表明:甲磺草胺对蔗田常见的禾本科、莎草科杂草和阔叶杂草有较好活性,当处理剂量为有效成分70 g/hm2时,对光头稗(Echinochloacolonum)、牛筋草(Eleusineindica)、马唐(Digitariasanguinalis)、香附子(Cyperusrotundus)、绿苋(Amaranthusviridis)和龙葵(Solanumnigrum)的鲜重抑制率均高于90%,对筒轴茅(Rottboellia cochinchinensis)、铜锤草(Oxalis corymbosa)和鹅绒藤(Cynanchum chinense)的鲜重抑制率高于80%;甲磺草胺对光头稗、牛筋草、马唐和香附子等4种主要蔗田杂草的除草活性均显著高于敌草隆;甲磺草胺在甘蔗品种‘新台糖22号’与光头稗、牛筋草、马唐和香附子之间的选择性系数依次为2.04、2.67、2.95和2.25,均明显高于对照药剂敌草隆的1.74、1.68、1.80和1.24;在甘蔗品种‘桂糖46号’与杂草间的选择性系数与‘新台糖22号’相近。研究结果表明甲磺草胺对蔗田多种主要杂草防效较好,且对广西种植面积最大的两种甘蔗品种安全,因此可以作为蔗田苗前除草剂的备选药剂。
        In order to explore its application prospect in sugarcane field in Guangxi,the weed controlling spectrum,herbicidal activity and safety of sulfentrazone to sugarcane were tested under greenhouse conditions.The results showed that sulfentrazone displayed good controlling effect on the common grasses,broadleaf weeds and sedge weeds in sugarcane.The fresh weight control effect was higher than 90% to Echinochloa colonum,Eleusine indica,Digitaria sanguinalis,Cyperus rotundus,Amaranthus viridis and Solanum nigrum as the treatment dose was 70 g/hm2 while the fresh weight control was higher than 80% to Rottboellia cochinchinensis,Oxalis corymbosa and Cynanchum chinense.Sulfentrazone howed higher herbicidal activity against E.colonum,E.indica,D.sanguinalis and C.rotundus than diuron.The selectivity index between 'Xintaitang 22'(a sugarcane variety) and E.colonum,E.indica,D.sanguinalis,C.rotundus was 2.04,2.67,2.95 and 2.25,respectively,which was much higher than that of diuron with corresponding selectivity index of 1.74,1.68,1.80 and 1.24,respectively.The selectivity index between 'Guitang 46'(another sugarcane variety) and the weed species mentioned above was similar to that of 'Xintaitang 22'.This study indicated that sulfentrazone had a good control effect on a variety of major weeds in sugarcane fields and it was safe to the two sugarcane varieties that planted in large-scale in Guangxi.Therefore,it could be used as one of the alternative agents for pre-emergence herbicides in sugarcane fields.
引文
[1]李杨瑞.现代甘蔗学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2010:27-32.
    [2]李奇伟,安玉兴.现代甘蔗产业技术[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2012:15-44.
    [3]廖东声,覃思静.广西甘蔗产业生产成本核算及控制问题分析[J].学术论坛,2013,36(8):83-87.
    [4]覃建林,龙丽萍,梁卫忠,等.13种除草剂对甘蔗田恶性杂草香附子的防除效果试验及评价[J].广西农业科学,2005,36(4):359-362.
    [5]马永林,覃建林,马跃峰,等.14种磺酰脲类除草剂对蔗田香附子的防效及安全性评价[J].西南农业学报,2014,27(6):2419-2422.
    [6]覃慧丽.三氟啶磺隆钠盐在甘蔗田土壤中的残留及其对甘庶套种作物的安全性评价[D].南宁:广西大学,2014.
    [7]梁元耀,方峰,韦茂春,等.40%莠灭净油悬浮剂防除蔗田杂草药效试验[J].化工技术与开发,2013,42(6):1-3.
    [8]段维兴,刘许辉,杨海霞,等.4种除草剂对甘蔗新品种产量及构成因素的影响[J].作物研究,2012,26(5):504-507.
    [9]陈立君,赵欢欢,付建涛,等.硝磺草酮等复配剂对蔗田杂草的防治效果[J].甘蔗糖业,2017(4):27-31.
    [10]吴晓莲.芽前除草剂在主壤中的动态分布及对甘礁萌芽生长的影响[D].福州:福建农林大学,2016.
    [11]Kaur N,Bhullar M S,Gill G.Weed management in sugarcane-canola intercropping systems in northern India[J].Field Crops Research,2016,188:1-9.
    [12]陈庆华,周小刚,郑仕军,等.68%2甲4氯·敌草隆·莠灭净WP等防除甘蔗田杂草的效果[J].杂草科学,2012,30(4):52-54.
    [13]谭金妮,李琦,郭文磊,等.丙炔氟草胺除草活性及对棉花的安全性[J].农药学学报,2017,19(2):189-194.
    [14]毕亚玲,王曹阳,谷刚,等.双环磺草酮除草活性及对水稻的安全性研究[J].农药学学报,2018,20(1):18-24.
    [15]Krachmer H,Van Almsick A,Beffa R,et al.Herbicides as weed control agents:state of the art:II.Recent achievements[J].Plant Physiology,2014,166(3):1132-1148.
    [16]Duke S O.Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years?[J].Pest Management Science,2012,68(4):505-512.
    [17]刘长令.世界农药大全[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002:133-142.
    [18]马跃峰,杜晓莉,覃建林.75%磺酰唑草酮干悬浮剂芽前防除蔗田杂草研究[J].植物保护,2005,31(1):85-87.
    [19]郭成林,马跃峰,马永林,等.甲磺草胺对后茬作物室内安全性评价[J].农药,2014,53(6):426-431.
    [20]中华人民共和国农业部.农药室内生物测定试验准则除草剂第3部分:活性测定试验土壤喷雾法:NY/T1155.3-2006[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
    [21]中华人民共和国农业部.农药室内生物测定试验准则除草剂第6部分:对作物的安全性试验土壤喷雾法:NY/T1155.6-2006[S].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
    [22]赵善欢.植物化学保护[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:7-18.
    [23]唐启义.GPS数据处理系统:第3卷专业统计及其他[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,2013:977-986.
    [24]马永林,马跃峰,郭成林,等.3种蔗田除草剂混配室内活性及对甘蔗安全性测定[J].广东农业科学,2006,41(3):90-93.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700