摘要
审稿专家管理是同行评审工作的重要环节,而目前学术期刊审稿专家管理中存在较多问题。在"互联网+"时代,开放研究者与贡献者身份识别码(ORCID)在期刊中的应用为优化管理审稿专家提供了可能,并在实际应用中具有较强的可操作性。文章在分析ORCID管理审稿专家可行性的基础上,以典型的编辑实例,介绍了ORCID在审稿专家管理中的具体应用,如扩充并更新审稿专家库、准确遴选审稿专家、提高专家的审稿积极性等,探索一条适合"互联网+"时代的审稿专家管理新途径。
The management of peer reviews is an important part of peer review work,but there are many problems in the management of peer reviewers in academic journals. In the "Internet + "era,the application of ORCID in academic journals provides the possibility of optimizing management reviewers and has strong maneuverability in practical application. Based on the analysis of feasibility of ORCID in managing peer reviewers,we take a typical editor as an example to introduce a new application of ORCID in the management of reviewers,such as extending and updating reviewer libraries, selecting reviewers accurately, improving review enthusiasm,and so on. We hope to explore a new way for reviewers management in academic journals that is suitable in the "Internet+ "era.
引文
[1]杨雷,郝洁.学术论文同行评审过程中编辑的作为[J].编辑学报,2010,22(2):106
[2]方卿.我国学术期刊同行评审现状分析[J].中国编辑,2006(6):57
[3]王华生.学术稿件专家外审存在的问题与编辑控制[J].中国出版,2012(14):14
[4]李云霞.加强审稿专家队伍的动态管理[J].编辑学报,2005,17(1):66
[5]孙丽莉,刘祥娥.高校学报“小同行”审稿专家的遴选[J].编辑学报,2011,23(2):139
[6]丁佐奇.提高同行专家审稿积极性的实践及思考[J].编辑学报,2017,29(1):58
[7]郑晓艳.学术期刊审稿专家库的建设与管理[J].黄冈师范学院学报,2015,35(3):129
[8]姜春林,王文苑,孙卫.ACA法在人文社会科学学术期刊审稿专家遴选中的应用[J].出版发行研究,2013(5):82
[9]魏中青.ORCID国际学术身份证在我国科技期刊中的应用[J].科技与出版,2015(5):101
[10]史朋亮,吴晨.基于小世界网络模型建设学术期刊审稿专家数据库网络群[J].编辑学报,2011,23(6):540
[11]郭红明.影响专家审稿积极性的因素分析及对策[J].编辑学报,2015,27(6):560
[12]HANSON B,LAWRENCE R,MEADOWS A,et al.Early adopters of ORCID functionality enabling recognition of peer review:two brief case studies[J].Learned Publishing,2016,29(1):60
[13]陶范.审稿专家的责任和权利[J].编辑学报,2010,22(6):475
[14]李金丽,徐用吉,史春薇.我国科技期刊应用ORCID服务科研工作者研究[J].出版发行研究,2016(11):42