摘要
目的:比较两种方法制作的猪小肠黏膜下层的力学性能。方法:用物理及化学方法处理猪小肠黏膜下层,并分别用编织(A组)和轴卷(B组)两种方法制备。移植重建SD大鼠前交叉韧带,3个月后应用试验机对两组不同方法制作的猪小肠黏膜下层进行力学性能检测。结果:A组最大拉伸强度明显强于B组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.966 0,P<0.05)。结论:编织猪小肠黏膜下层的抗拉强度大于轴卷组。
引文
[1] Leung TH,Snyder ER,Liu Y,et al.A cellular,molecular,and pHarmacological basis for appendage regeneration in mice[J].Genes Dev,2015,29(10):2097-2107.
[2] Yang MY,Wang J,Zhu Y,et al.Bio-templated growth of bone minerals from modified Simulated body fluid on nanofibrous decellularized natural tissues[J].J Biomed Nanotechnol,2016,12(4):753-761.
[3] Sun T,Liu M,Yao S,et al.Biomimetic Composite Scaffold Containing Small Intestinal Submucosa and Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Exhibits High Osteogenic and Angiogenic Capacity[J].Tissue Engineering Part A,2018,24(13-14):1044-1056.
[4] Cook JL, Hung CT, Kuroki K, et al. Animal models of cartilage repair[J].Bone Joint Res,2014,3(4):89-94.
[5] Elsawy MM,De MA.Biofabrication and biomaterials for urinary tract reconstruction[J].Res Rep Urol,2017,9(10):79-92.
[6]罗静聪,杨志明.小肠豁膜下层的制备及其特性的研究进展[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2003,17(5):425.
[7] Dziki JL,Huleihel L,Scarritt ME,et al.Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds as Immunomodulatory Biomaterials[J].Tissue Eng Part A,2017,23(19-20):1152-1159.
[8] Giedraitis A,Arnoczky SP,Bedi A.Allografts in soft tissue reconstructive procedures:important considerations[J].Sports Health,2014,6(3):256-264.
[9] Polak DJ.Regenerative medicine.Opportunities and challenges:a brief overview[J].R Soc Interface,2010,7(Suppl 6):777-781.
[10] Meesuk L,Tantrawatpan C,Kheolamai P.et al.The immunosuppressive capacity of human mesenchy-mal stromal cells derived from amnion and bone marrow[J].Biochem BiopHys Rep,2016,8(3):34-40.
[11] Liang R,Knight K,Easley D et al.Towards rebuilding vaginal support utilizing an extracellular matrix bioscaffold[J].Acta Biomater,2017,57(15):324-333.
[12]曹德君,翟华玲,刘伟,等.体外构建组织工程化肌腱的初步研究[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(2):110-113.