优质护理干预在小儿重症肺炎中的护理效果观察
|
摘要
目的分析优质护理干预在小儿重症肺炎中的护理效果。方法选取2016年1月～2017年10月重症肺炎患儿107例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(n=53)和观察组(n=54),对照组采用常规护理模式,观察组采取优质护理干预模式,比较两组护理效果。结果观察组气促改善时间、退热时间、止咳时间均要优于对照组,具有统计学意义(均P <0.05)。观察组护患纠纷发生8例,观察组护患纠纷发生2例,差异显著具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。观察组护理总满意率明显高于对照组,差异显著具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论针对重症肺炎患儿采用优质护理干预可促进患儿康复,提高护理满意度,降低护患纠纷发生,提高患儿家属对护理工作的认可。
Objective To analyze the nursing effect of high quality nursing intervention in children with severe pneumonia. Methods The study period for the January 2016-2017 year in October, were included in the study were 107 cases were with severe pneumonia were randomLy divided into control group and observation group, control group received routine nursing care, observation group adopt high quality nursing intervention, nursing effects were compared between the two groups.Results The observation group improvement time, the time of fever, shortness of breath and cough time were superior to the control group, the two groups had significant difference, with statistical significance, P < 0.05. There were 8 cases of nursing disputes in the observation group, and 2 cases of the nursing disputes in the observation group. The difference was significant(P < 0.05). The total nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion High quality nursing intervention for children with severe pneumonia can promote children's rehabilitation, improve nursing satisfaction, reduce nurse patient disputes and improve family members' recognition of nursing work.
Objective To analyze the nursing effect of high quality nursing intervention in children with severe pneumonia. Methods The study period for the January 2016-2017 year in October, were included in the study were 107 cases were with severe pneumonia were randomLy divided into control group and observation group, control group received routine nursing care, observation group adopt high quality nursing intervention, nursing effects were compared between the two groups.Results The observation group improvement time, the time of fever, shortness of breath and cough time were superior to the control group, the two groups had significant difference, with statistical significance, P < 0.05. There were 8 cases of nursing disputes in the observation group, and 2 cases of the nursing disputes in the observation group. The difference was significant(P < 0.05). The total nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion High quality nursing intervention for children with severe pneumonia can promote children's rehabilitation, improve nursing satisfaction, reduce nurse patient disputes and improve family members' recognition of nursing work.
引文
[1]金朱,鄢敏,陈承,郭美元.探讨综合护理干预对小儿重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭的临床效果[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(35):154-155.
[2]赵神秀.个性化全程护理干预在小儿麻疹并重症肺炎中的实践与评估[J].延安大学学报(医学科学版),2017,15(04):84-86.
[3]张荣洁.小儿重症肺炎机械通气气道护理进展[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2017(12):23-25.
[4]欧阳蕾.综合护理干预小儿重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭的临床效果[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2017,1(08):121.
[5]熊莹.小儿重症肺炎的优质护理干预及效果评析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(40):239-240.
[6]李艳芳.小儿重症肺炎支原体肺炎的临床表现与护理干预措施研究[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(12):94-96.
[7]卫娟.优质护理干预对小儿重症肺炎的治疗效果影响[J].中外女性健康研究,2016(13):169,172.
[8]杜爱清.优质护理干预在小儿重症肺炎中的护理效果评价[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(16):163-164,168.
[9]连少蓉,黄美琴.优质护理干预在小儿重症肺炎中的护理效果[J].中外医学研究,2015,13(35):112-113.
[10]张丽平.优质护理干预在小儿重症肺炎中的护理效果观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2013,7(23):184-185.
[2]赵神秀.个性化全程护理干预在小儿麻疹并重症肺炎中的实践与评估[J].延安大学学报(医学科学版),2017,15(04):84-86.
[3]张荣洁.小儿重症肺炎机械通气气道护理进展[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2017(12):23-25.
[4]欧阳蕾.综合护理干预小儿重症肺炎并发呼吸衰竭的临床效果[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2017,1(08):121.
[5]熊莹.小儿重症肺炎的优质护理干预及效果评析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(40):239-240.
[6]李艳芳.小儿重症肺炎支原体肺炎的临床表现与护理干预措施研究[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(12):94-96.
[7]卫娟.优质护理干预对小儿重症肺炎的治疗效果影响[J].中外女性健康研究,2016(13):169,172.
[8]杜爱清.优质护理干预在小儿重症肺炎中的护理效果评价[J].中国现代医生,2016,54(16):163-164,168.
[9]连少蓉,黄美琴.优质护理干预在小儿重症肺炎中的护理效果[J].中外医学研究,2015,13(35):112-113.
[10]张丽平.优质护理干预在小儿重症肺炎中的护理效果观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2013,7(23):184-185.