3种旱生植物的叶绿素荧光参数日变化研究
|
摘要
采用便捷式光合仪LI-6400XT的荧光叶室6400-40测定了3种自然生长的植物的叶绿素荧光参数日变化,以研究金昌干旱区植物的抗光抑制能力,揭示其对强光环境的适应性。结果表明:骆驼蓬的叶绿素荧光参数值都大于猪毛菜和盐生草。骆驼蓬和盐生草Fo呈先升后降再升趋势,猪毛菜的Fo呈先降后升再降趋势; 3种植物Fv/Fo、Fv/Fm、Fv’/Fm’呈先降后升的趋势;骆驼蓬的Yield表现出先降后升再降趋势,猪毛菜和盐生草的Yield呈双峰型; 3种植物的qP呈双峰型; ETR、NPQ呈先升后降的趋势。猪毛菜ETR、NPQ和qP、骆驼蓬ETR和qP、盐生草Fo、NPQ和ETR与光照强度在0. 05水平上呈显著正相关;猪毛菜NPQ和qP、骆驼蓬ETR、qP、Fv/Fm、Fv’/Fm’、Fv/Fo、盐生草Fv/Fm、Fv’/Fm’与气温有显著相关性。3种植物的光抑制强弱为:骆驼蓬>猪毛菜>盐生草,骆驼蓬的抗光抑制能力最强,更适应强光环境。强光下骆驼蓬较大程度的通过热耗散过剩光能保护光合器官免遭破坏,而猪毛菜和盐生草可能还有其它因素的调节。
The diurnal changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Peganum harmala L,Salsola collina Pall and Halogeton glomeratus that grow naturally were studied by using the fluorescent leaf chamber 6400-40 of the convenient photosynthetic apparatus LI-6400 XT to study the anti-light suppression ability and the adaptability to strong light of the plants in the Jinchang area. The results showed that the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Peganum harmala were all higher than that of Salsola collina and Halogeton glomeratus. The Fo of Peganum harmala and Halogeton glomeratus showed a tendency to rise firstly and then fall down,and then rise again; and the Fo of Salsola collina was decreased firstly and then rise,and then decreased. The trends of Fm,Fv,Fv/Fo,Fv/Fm,Fv'/Fm' showed decrease firstly then riseing. The yield of Peganum harmala showed trend of decrease-increase-decrease,and the yield of Salsol acollina and Halogeton glomeratus were double-peaked. The qP of three plants were double peak. ETR and NPQ showed first rise and then fall trend. The light suppression ability of three plants is: Peganum harmala > Salsola collina > Halogeton glomeratus. Peganum harmala has stronger ability to resist light than Chenopodiaceae,and more suitable for strong light environment.
The diurnal changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Peganum harmala L,Salsola collina Pall and Halogeton glomeratus that grow naturally were studied by using the fluorescent leaf chamber 6400-40 of the convenient photosynthetic apparatus LI-6400 XT to study the anti-light suppression ability and the adaptability to strong light of the plants in the Jinchang area. The results showed that the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Peganum harmala were all higher than that of Salsola collina and Halogeton glomeratus. The Fo of Peganum harmala and Halogeton glomeratus showed a tendency to rise firstly and then fall down,and then rise again; and the Fo of Salsola collina was decreased firstly and then rise,and then decreased. The trends of Fm,Fv,Fv/Fo,Fv/Fm,Fv'/Fm' showed decrease firstly then riseing. The yield of Peganum harmala showed trend of decrease-increase-decrease,and the yield of Salsol acollina and Halogeton glomeratus were double-peaked. The qP of three plants were double peak. ETR and NPQ showed first rise and then fall trend. The light suppression ability of three plants is: Peganum harmala > Salsola collina > Halogeton glomeratus. Peganum harmala has stronger ability to resist light than Chenopodiaceae,and more suitable for strong light environment.
引文
[1]刘建福.澳州坚果叶片光合速率和叶绿素荧光参数日变化[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2006,28(2):271-274.
[2]褚建民,孟平,张劲松,等.土壤水分胁迫对欧李幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2008,21(3):295-300.
[3]敖金成,苏文华,张光飞,等.不同光强下对马耳蕨叶绿素荧光参数的日变化[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(1):135-138.
[4]Maxwell K,Johnson G N. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2000,51(345):659-668.
[5]吴家森,宋福强,陈荣,等. 3种七叶树属植物叶片气体交换特征和叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].植物研究,2008,28(4):438-441.
[6]Van K O,Snel J F. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology[J]. Photosynthesis Research,1990,25(3):147-150.
[7]徐德聪,吕芳德,潘晓杰.叶绿素荧光分析技术在果树研究中的应用[J].经济林研究,2003,21(3):88-91.
[8]刘扬,周海燕,赵昕,等.几种荒漠植物干旱休眠机理的初步研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(1):76-81.
[9]孙小五,汪矛,毕冬玲,等.猪毛菜幼苗的发育解剖学研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(5):917-922.
[10]Khan M A,Gul B,Weber D J. Seed germination characteristics of Halogeton glomeratus[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,2001,79(10):1189-1194(6).
[11]Sun H Y,Zhang X M,Li L,et al. Estimation on aboveground biomass and the characteristics of population families of the Halophilous herbaceous plants in three different areas of South Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2008,20(4):193-197.
[12]马木木,李熙萌,石莎,等.科尔沁沙地黄柳(Salix gordejevii)光合特性[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(2):352-357.
[13]郑淑霞,上官周平. 8种阔叶树种叶片气体交换特征和叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1080-1087.
[14]李西文,陈士林.遮荫下高原濒危药用植物川贝母(Fritillaria cirrhosa)光合作用和叶绿素荧光特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):3438-3447.
[15]李超,王育青,高丽,等.九个苜蓿品种叶绿素荧光参数与叶水势日变化研究[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(2):23-29.
[16]孟元发,王育青,闫志坚,等.库布齐沙地4个苜蓿品种的叶绿素荧光比较[J].中国草地学报,2016,38(1):116-120.
[17]Quist G,Chow W S,Anderson J M. Photoinhibtion of photosynthesis represents a mechanism for the long-term regulation of photosystem II[J]. Planta,1992,186(3):450-460.
[18]卢从明,张其德,匡廷云.水分胁迫对小麦光系统II的影响[J].植物学报(英文版),1994,36(2):93-98.
[19]Xu C,Li D,Zou Q,et al. Effect of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence and xanthophyll cycle components in winter wheat leaves with different ages[J]. Acta Photophysiologica Sinica,1999,25(1):29-37.
[20]姚春娟,郭圣茂,陈兰兰,等.草决明叶绿素荧光特性的秋季日变化[J].农业与技术,2015,35(20):27-28.
[21]冯志立,冯玉龙,曹坤芳.光强对砂仁叶片光合作用光抑制及热耗散的影响[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(1):77-82.
[22]贾浩,郝建博,曹洪波,等.遮荫对‘保佳红’桃树叶片快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学曲线的影响[J].西北植物学报,2015,35(9):1861-1867.
[23]师生波,尚艳霞,朱鹏锦,等.不同天气类型下UV-B辐射对高山植物美丽风毛菊叶片PSII光化学效率的影响分析[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(7):741-750.
[24]Rohácvek K. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters:the definitions,photosynthetic meaning,and mutual relationships[J]. Photosynthetica,2002,40(1):13-29.
[25]Murchie E H,Niyogi K K. Manipulation of photoprotection to improve plant photosynthesis[J]. Plant Physiology,2011,155(1):86-92.
[26]齐书香,马成仓,魏亚冉.内蒙古高原荒漠区几种锦鸡儿属优势植物叶绿素荧光参数的比较研究[J].天津师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,29(4):61-66.
[27]种培芳,李毅,苏世平.荒漠植物红砂叶绿素荧光参数日变化及其与环境因子的关系[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(3):539-545.
[28]张学权.椒-草种植模式下5种牧草的光合生理特征分析[J].成都大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(4):325-327.
[29]周蕴薇,刘艳萍,戴思兰.用叶绿素荧光分析技术鉴定植物抗寒性的剖析[J].植物生理学通讯,2006,42(5):945-950.
[30]肖金香.气象学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014.
[2]褚建民,孟平,张劲松,等.土壤水分胁迫对欧李幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2008,21(3):295-300.
[3]敖金成,苏文华,张光飞,等.不同光强下对马耳蕨叶绿素荧光参数的日变化[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(1):135-138.
[4]Maxwell K,Johnson G N. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2000,51(345):659-668.
[5]吴家森,宋福强,陈荣,等. 3种七叶树属植物叶片气体交换特征和叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].植物研究,2008,28(4):438-441.
[6]Van K O,Snel J F. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology[J]. Photosynthesis Research,1990,25(3):147-150.
[7]徐德聪,吕芳德,潘晓杰.叶绿素荧光分析技术在果树研究中的应用[J].经济林研究,2003,21(3):88-91.
[8]刘扬,周海燕,赵昕,等.几种荒漠植物干旱休眠机理的初步研究[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(1):76-81.
[9]孙小五,汪矛,毕冬玲,等.猪毛菜幼苗的发育解剖学研究[J].西北植物学报,2005,25(5):917-922.
[10]Khan M A,Gul B,Weber D J. Seed germination characteristics of Halogeton glomeratus[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,2001,79(10):1189-1194(6).
[11]Sun H Y,Zhang X M,Li L,et al. Estimation on aboveground biomass and the characteristics of population families of the Halophilous herbaceous plants in three different areas of South Tarim Basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2008,20(4):193-197.
[12]马木木,李熙萌,石莎,等.科尔沁沙地黄柳(Salix gordejevii)光合特性[J].中国沙漠,2015,35(2):352-357.
[13]郑淑霞,上官周平. 8种阔叶树种叶片气体交换特征和叶绿素荧光特性比较[J].生态学报,2006,26(4):1080-1087.
[14]李西文,陈士林.遮荫下高原濒危药用植物川贝母(Fritillaria cirrhosa)光合作用和叶绿素荧光特征[J].生态学报,2008,28(7):3438-3447.
[15]李超,王育青,高丽,等.九个苜蓿品种叶绿素荧光参数与叶水势日变化研究[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(2):23-29.
[16]孟元发,王育青,闫志坚,等.库布齐沙地4个苜蓿品种的叶绿素荧光比较[J].中国草地学报,2016,38(1):116-120.
[17]Quist G,Chow W S,Anderson J M. Photoinhibtion of photosynthesis represents a mechanism for the long-term regulation of photosystem II[J]. Planta,1992,186(3):450-460.
[18]卢从明,张其德,匡廷云.水分胁迫对小麦光系统II的影响[J].植物学报(英文版),1994,36(2):93-98.
[19]Xu C,Li D,Zou Q,et al. Effect of drought on chlorophyll fluorescence and xanthophyll cycle components in winter wheat leaves with different ages[J]. Acta Photophysiologica Sinica,1999,25(1):29-37.
[20]姚春娟,郭圣茂,陈兰兰,等.草决明叶绿素荧光特性的秋季日变化[J].农业与技术,2015,35(20):27-28.
[21]冯志立,冯玉龙,曹坤芳.光强对砂仁叶片光合作用光抑制及热耗散的影响[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(1):77-82.
[22]贾浩,郝建博,曹洪波,等.遮荫对‘保佳红’桃树叶片快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学曲线的影响[J].西北植物学报,2015,35(9):1861-1867.
[23]师生波,尚艳霞,朱鹏锦,等.不同天气类型下UV-B辐射对高山植物美丽风毛菊叶片PSII光化学效率的影响分析[J].植物生态学报,2011,35(7):741-750.
[24]Rohácvek K. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters:the definitions,photosynthetic meaning,and mutual relationships[J]. Photosynthetica,2002,40(1):13-29.
[25]Murchie E H,Niyogi K K. Manipulation of photoprotection to improve plant photosynthesis[J]. Plant Physiology,2011,155(1):86-92.
[26]齐书香,马成仓,魏亚冉.内蒙古高原荒漠区几种锦鸡儿属优势植物叶绿素荧光参数的比较研究[J].天津师范大学学报(自然科学版),2009,29(4):61-66.
[27]种培芳,李毅,苏世平.荒漠植物红砂叶绿素荧光参数日变化及其与环境因子的关系[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(3):539-545.
[28]张学权.椒-草种植模式下5种牧草的光合生理特征分析[J].成都大学学报(自然科学版),2013,32(4):325-327.
[29]周蕴薇,刘艳萍,戴思兰.用叶绿素荧光分析技术鉴定植物抗寒性的剖析[J].植物生理学通讯,2006,42(5):945-950.
[30]肖金香.气象学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2014.