“信达雅”与“传神达意”在文学翻译中的异同
|
摘要
在当今中西方文化大交融的时代,翻译是促进文化交流的重要途径之一,对中国文化走向世界有着举足轻重的意义。我国翻译史上著名翻译大家严复创立了"信达雅"翻译三原则,其影响深远。随着时代向前发展,翻译学日益昌盛,当代知名翻译家汪榕培提出了"传神达意"的翻译理论,为文学翻译事业提供了新的翻译标准。本文将通过对严复"信达雅"与汪榕培"传神达意"进行对比分析进而阐述两者之间的异同。
In today's era of great integration of Chinese and Western cultures,translation is one of the important ways to promote cultural exchanges and plays a decisive role in China's culture towards the world.Yan Fu,a famous translator in the history of translation in China,has established three principles of "faithfulness,expressiveness and elegance" which have far-reaching influence.With the development of the times and the flourishing of translation studies,Wang Rongpei,a well-known contemporary translator,put forward the theory of "transmitting spirit and conveying ideas" translation,which provides a new translation standard for literary translation.This paper will discuss the similarities and differences between Yan Fu's "faithfulness,expressiveness and elegance" and Wang Rongpei's "transmitting spirit and conveying ideas".
In today's era of great integration of Chinese and Western cultures,translation is one of the important ways to promote cultural exchanges and plays a decisive role in China's culture towards the world.Yan Fu,a famous translator in the history of translation in China,has established three principles of "faithfulness,expressiveness and elegance" which have far-reaching influence.With the development of the times and the flourishing of translation studies,Wang Rongpei,a well-known contemporary translator,put forward the theory of "transmitting spirit and conveying ideas" translation,which provides a new translation standard for literary translation.This paper will discuss the similarities and differences between Yan Fu's "faithfulness,expressiveness and elegance" and Wang Rongpei's "transmitting spirit and conveying ideas".
引文
[1]赫胥黎.天演论[M].严复,译,北京:商务印书馆,1981.
[2]汪榕培,王宏.中国典籍英译[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2009.
[3]赫胥黎.进化论与伦理学[M].翻译组,译,北京:科学出版社,1971.
[4]Ezra Pound.Poems and Translations[M].New York:The Library of America,2003.
[5]格兰·菲利普斯.岩石之歌[M].韩竹林,译,哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社,2013.
[6]Glen Phillips,Du Hongbo.The Woman River[M].Australia:ICLL Press,2012.
[7]赫胥黎.天演论(英文版)[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2011.
[8]韩竹林,胡亚会.象似性视阈下的诗歌翻译---析澳洲诗人格兰·菲利普斯诗歌译作三首[J].作家,2013(4):127-128.
[9]吴越民.隐喻研究的跨文化视角[J].牡丹江师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(3):122-128.
[10]张林影,樊月圆.文化翻译观下《庄子》英译本翻译研究[J].牡丹江师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(3):129-133.
[11]张义宏.《金瓶梅》两个英译本茶饮名称英译策略探究[J].牡丹江师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(5):93-98.
[2]汪榕培,王宏.中国典籍英译[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2009.
[3]赫胥黎.进化论与伦理学[M].翻译组,译,北京:科学出版社,1971.
[4]Ezra Pound.Poems and Translations[M].New York:The Library of America,2003.
[5]格兰·菲利普斯.岩石之歌[M].韩竹林,译,哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学出版社,2013.
[6]Glen Phillips,Du Hongbo.The Woman River[M].Australia:ICLL Press,2012.
[7]赫胥黎.天演论(英文版)[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2011.
[8]韩竹林,胡亚会.象似性视阈下的诗歌翻译---析澳洲诗人格兰·菲利普斯诗歌译作三首[J].作家,2013(4):127-128.
[9]吴越民.隐喻研究的跨文化视角[J].牡丹江师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(3):122-128.
[10]张林影,樊月圆.文化翻译观下《庄子》英译本翻译研究[J].牡丹江师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(3):129-133.
[11]张义宏.《金瓶梅》两个英译本茶饮名称英译策略探究[J].牡丹江师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,2018(5):93-98.