伯克特对马克思政治经济学批判中劳动范畴生态学意蕴的辩护
|
摘要
生态学界普遍认为马克思早期的劳动范畴具有生态学意识,而政治经济学批判中的劳动范畴与古典经济学的劳动范畴一样走上了与自然对抗的路径。伯克特对生态学家们的质疑和非议进行了一一回应,指出了正确地也就是辩证地理解政治经济学批判视域中劳动范畴的方式,并批判了试图以生态调节劳动范畴来代替劳动范畴的核心位置的做法,揭示了马克思的劳动范畴在从抽象到具体的理论铺展过程中与自然问题紧密结合的环节,从而对劳动范畴的生态学意蕴作了有力的辩护。
Ecologists generally believe that Marx's early labor category has ecological consciousness,and the labor category in the political and economic criticism,like that in classical economics,has embarked on the path of confrontation with nature. Burkett responded to the questions and criticisms of those ecologists,pointed out that the correct way to understand the labor category in the critical field of political economy dialectically,and criticized the attempt to replace the core position of the labor category with the ecologically regulated labor category,and revealed that Marx's labor category followed the theoretical development from the abstract to the concrete as well as its link closely combined with nature issues,thereby making a powerful defense of the ecological implication of the labor category.
Ecologists generally believe that Marx's early labor category has ecological consciousness,and the labor category in the political and economic criticism,like that in classical economics,has embarked on the path of confrontation with nature. Burkett responded to the questions and criticisms of those ecologists,pointed out that the correct way to understand the labor category in the critical field of political economy dialectically,and criticized the attempt to replace the core position of the labor category with the ecologically regulated labor category,and revealed that Marx's labor category followed the theoretical development from the abstract to the concrete as well as its link closely combined with nature issues,thereby making a powerful defense of the ecological implication of the labor category.
引文
[1]马克思恩格斯全集(第23卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集(42卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[3]Carpenter.Rethinking Scarcity:Marxism and Ecology Reconciled[J].Democracy﹠Nature,1997,3(3):148.
[4]Paul Burket.Marx and Nature:a Red and Green Perspective[M].Basingstoke:Macmillan Press,1999.
[5]马克思恩格斯全集(第47卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979:68.
[6]韩立新.马克思的物质代谢概念与环境保护思想[J].哲学研究,2002,(2).
[7]马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:532.
[8]Skirbekk Gunnar.Marx and Ecology[J].Capitalism,Nature,Socialism,1994,5(4):98.
[9]Benton Ted.Marxism and Natural Limits:An Ecological Critique and Reconstruction[J].New Left Review,1989,(November/December):64-72.
[10]Grundmann Reiner.The Ecological Challenge to Marxism[J].New Left Review,1991,(May/June):108.
[11]马克思恩格斯全集(第24卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.
[2]马克思恩格斯全集(42卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[3]Carpenter.Rethinking Scarcity:Marxism and Ecology Reconciled[J].Democracy﹠Nature,1997,3(3):148.
[4]Paul Burket.Marx and Nature:a Red and Green Perspective[M].Basingstoke:Macmillan Press,1999.
[5]马克思恩格斯全集(第47卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979:68.
[6]韩立新.马克思的物质代谢概念与环境保护思想[J].哲学研究,2002,(2).
[7]马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995:532.
[8]Skirbekk Gunnar.Marx and Ecology[J].Capitalism,Nature,Socialism,1994,5(4):98.
[9]Benton Ted.Marxism and Natural Limits:An Ecological Critique and Reconstruction[J].New Left Review,1989,(November/December):64-72.
[10]Grundmann Reiner.The Ecological Challenge to Marxism[J].New Left Review,1991,(May/June):108.
[11]马克思恩格斯全集(第24卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1972.