页岩气藏压裂液返排理论与技术研究进展
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Advances in the theory and technique of the fracturing fluid flowback in shale gas reservoirs
  • 作者:任岚 ; 邸云婷 ; 赵金洲 ; 荣莽
  • 英文作者:REN Lan;DI Yunting;ZHAO Jinzhou;RONG Mang;State Key Laboratory of Oil-Gas Reservoir Geology & Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University;Engineering Technology Institute,SINOPEC Jianghan Oilfield Company;
  • 关键词:页岩 ; 压裂液 ; 返排 ; 压裂 ; 气水两相 ; 数值模拟
  • 英文关键词:shale;;fracturing fluids;;flowback;;fracturing;;gas-water two phase;;numerical simulation
  • 中文刊名:DQSK
  • 英文刊名:Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing
  • 机构:西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室;中国石化江汉油田石油工程技术研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-14 11:05
  • 出版单位:大庆石油地质与开发
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.38;No.192
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目“页岩地层动态随机裂缝控制机理与无水压裂理论”(51490653);; 国家科技重大专项“涪陵页岩气开发示范工程”(2016ZX05060)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DQSK201902021
  • 页数:9
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:23-1286/TE
  • 分类号:147-155
摘要
页岩气藏的压裂实践表明,压后返排设计对页岩气藏压裂效果具有重要影响。近年来,压裂液返排理论与技术研究已成为页岩压裂领域的热点问题。基于国内外学者在页岩压裂液返排机理、模型、影响因素及工程工艺等方面的研究成果,系统总结和分析了页岩压裂液返排控制机制与设计方法。页岩压后压裂液在返排过程中的力学影响因素主要有毛管力、重力、化学渗透力、黏性力、气体解吸附效应等;针对压裂液是否渗吸进入基质以及压裂液的返排流动区域的研究存在争议,大多数学者认为压裂液并不渗吸进入基质中,返排流动区域主要是压后形成的水力裂缝;根据页岩气田现场生产数据分析得出早期返排过程主要为气水两相流动,目前针对页岩压后返排两相流动过程的数值模拟模型,考虑影响因素单一,应建立综合考虑影响返排过程中各类因素的模型;工程应用现状表明目前现场对返排制度的尝试还不能实现合理的返排控制,返排制度制定缺少正确的理论指导。研究成果对开展页岩压裂返排理论与工程设计研究具有一定导向作用,对提升页岩压裂改造效果具有重要指导意义。
        The fracturing practice of shale gas reservoirs shows that the flowback design after the fracturing has an important influence on the fractured effects of the shale gas reservoirs. In recent years, the researches on the theory and technique of the flowback of the fracturing fluid have become a hot issue in the shale fracturing field. Based on the research results at home and abroad of the shale fracturing fluid flowback mechanism, model, influencing factors, engineering process and so on, the flowback controlling mechanism and the design methods of shale fracturing fluid were systematically summarized and analyzed. After the fracturing, the main mechanical influencing factors of the fracturing liquid in the flowback process are the capillary force, gravity, chemical penetration, viscous force, gas desorption effect and so forth; in the light of the researches on whether the fracturing fluid will infiltrate into the matrix and flowback into the flow area, there are a few disputes, most scholars believe that the fracturing fluid doesn't penetrate and imbibe into the matrix, the flowback flow area is mainly the fractured hydraulic fractures; the analysis of the field production data of the shale gas field shows that the early flowback process is mainly gas-water two-phase flow, at present, the two-phase flowback numerical simulating model considers only single influencing factor, so the model considering comprehensively each factor in the flowback process; the current status of the engineering application shows that the attempt of the flowback system has not yet achieved a reasonable flowback control, and the flowback system lacks the correct theoretical guidance. The study results possess a certain guiding to the shale fracturing flowback theory and engineering design research, and moreover have important guiding significance for improving the fractured effect of the shale.
引文
[1]KING G E. Hydraulic fracturing 101:What every representative,environmentalist,regulator,reporter,investor,university researcher,neighbor and engineer should know about estimating frac risk and improving frac performance in unconventional gas and oil wells[C]// Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012.
    [2]VENGOSH A, JACKSON R B, WARNER N, et al. A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(15):8334-8348.
    [3]LUTZ B D, LEWIS A N, DOYLE M W. Generation, transport, and disposal of wastewater associated with Marcellus shale gas development[J].Water Resources Research, 2013, 49(2):647-656.
    [4]高树生,胡志明,郭为,等. 页岩储层吸水特征与返排能力[J].天然气工业,2013,33(12):71-76.GAO Shusheng, HU Zhiming, GUO Wei, et al. Water absorption characteristics of gas shale and the fracturing fluid flowback capacity[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(12):71-76.
    [5]NICOT J P, SCANLON B R. Water use for shale-gas production in Texas, U.S.[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(6):3580-3586.
    [6]杨柳, 葛洪魁, 申颍浩. 一种评价页岩储层压裂液吸收的新方法[J].科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(24):48-53.YANG Liu, GE Hongkui, SHEN Yinghao.A new method for evaluating intake of fracturing fluid in shale formations[J].Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(24):48-53.
    [7]ENGELDER T, CATHLES L M, BRYNDZIA L T. The fate of residual treatment water in gas shale[J].Journal of Unconventional Oil & Gas Resources, 2014, 7(3):33-48.
    [8]杨柳, 葛洪魁, 程远方,等. 页岩储层压裂液渗吸-离子扩散及其影响因素[J].中国海上油气, 2016, 28(4):94-99.YANG Liu, GE Hongkui, CHENG Yuanfang, et al. Investigation on fracturing fluid imbibition-ion diffusion and its influencing factors in shale reservoirs[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2016, 28(4):94-99.
    [9]DEHGHANPOUR H, LAN Q, SAEED Y, et al. Spontaneous imbibition of brine and oil in gas shales:Effect of water adsorption and resulting microfractures[J].Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(6):3039-3049.
    [10]WANG J, RAHMAN S S. An investigation of fluid leak-off due to osmotic and capillary effects and its impact on micro-fracture generation during hydraulic fracturing stimulation of gas shale[C]// Europec, 2015.
    [11]FAKCHAROENPHOL P, KAZEMI H, CHAROENWONGSA S, et al. The effect of osmotic pressure on improve oil recovery from fractured shale formations[c]// spe unconventional resource conference, 2014.
    [12]杨发荣, 左罗, 胡志明,等. 页岩储层渗吸特性的实验研究[J].科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(25):63-66. YANG Farong, ZUO Luo, HU Zhiming, et al. Researching the water imbibition characteristic of shale by experiment[J].Science Technology and Engineering, 2016, 16(25):63-66.
    [13]WANG Fei, PAN Ziqing, ZHANG Shicheng. Modeling fracturing-fluid flowback behavior in hydraulically fractured shale gas under chemical potential dominated conditions[J].Applied Geochemistry, 2016, 74(11):194-202.
    [14]陈守雨, 修书志, 宋博,等. 页岩气井压后返排动态模拟研究[J].中外能源, 2016, 21(7):43-50.CHEN Shouyu, XIU Shuzhi, SONG Bo, et al.Research on dynamic simulation of fracturing fluid flowback in shale gas wells[J].Sino-Global Energy, 2016, 21(7):43-50.
    [15]YANG Ruiyue, HUANG Zhongwei, LI Gensheng, et al.A semianalytical approach to model two-phase flowback of shale-gas wells with complex-fracture-network geometries[J].SPE Journal, 2017,22(6):1808-1833.
    [16]GALE J F W, Laubach S E, Olson J E, et al. Natural fractures in shale: A review and new observations[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2014, 98(11):2165-2216.
    [17]ZHANG Rui, LIU Shimin, WANG Yang. Fractal evolution under in situ pressure and sorption conditions for coal and shale[J].Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1):8971.
    [18]CAO Peng, LIU Jishan,LEONG Y-K. A multiscale-multiphase simulation model for the evaluation of shale gas recovery coupled the effect of water flowback[J].Fuel, 2017, 199(7):191-205.
    [19]PENNY G, DOBKINS T, PURSLEY J.Field study of completion fluids to enhance gas production in the Barnett Shale[C]// SPE Gas Technology Symposium, 2006.
    [20]FAN L, THOMPSON J W, ROBINSON J R.Understanding gas production mechanism and effectiveness of well stimulation in the Haynesville Shale through reservoir simulation[C]// Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference,2010.
    [21]KING G E.Thirty years of gas shale fracturing: What have we learned[C]// Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010.
    [22]WARPINSKI N R, MAYERHOFER M J, VINCENT M C,et al.Stimulating unconventional reservoirs:Maximizing network growth while optimizing fracture conductivity[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2009, 48(10):39-51.
    [23]CIPOLLA C L, WARPINSKI N R, MAYERHOFER M J,et al. The relationship between fracture complexity, reservoir properties, and fracture treatment design[J].SPE Production & Operations, 2010, 25(4):438-452.
    [24]ODUSINA E O, SONDERGELD C H, RAI C S. An NMR study of shale wettability[R].SPE 147371,2011.
    [25]WANG Dongmei, BUTLER R, ZHANG Jin, et al. Wettability survey in Bakken shale with surfactant-formulation imbibition[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineers,2012,15(6):695-705.
    [26]EHLIG-ECONOMIDES C A, ECONOMIDES M J. Water as proppant[R].SPE 147603,2011.
    [27]蒋廷学, 卞晓冰, 王海涛,等. 页岩气水平井分段压裂排采规律研究[J].石油钻探技术, 2013,41(5):21-25.JIANG Tingxue, BIAN Xiaobing, WANG Haitao, et al.Flow back mechanism study of multi-stage fracturing of shale gas horizontal wells[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2013,41(5):21-25.
    [28]O’MALLEY D, KARRA S, CURRIER R P, et al. Where does water go during hydraulic fracturing[J].Ground Water, 2016, 54(4):488-497.
    [29]MAKHANOV K, HABIBI A, DEHGHANPOUR H, et al. Liquid uptake of gas shales: A workflow to estimate water loss during shut-in periods after fracturing operations[J].Journal of Unconventional Oil & Gas Resources, 2014, 7(7):22-32.
    [30]WILLIAMS-KOVACS J D, CLARKSON C R. A modified approach for modeling two-phase flowback from multi-fractured horizontal shale gas wells[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 30(3):127-147.
    [31]GHANBARI E, DEHGHANPOUR H. The fate of fracturing water: A field and simulation study[J].Fuel, 2016, 163(1):282-294.
    [32]郭小哲, 李景, 张欣. 页岩气藏压裂水平井物质平衡模型的建立[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(2):132-138.GUO Xiaozhe,LI Jing,ZHANG Xin.Study on the establishment of material balance model for fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition) , 2017, 39(2):132-138.
    [33]张涛, 李相方, 杨立峰,等. 关井时机对页岩气井返排率和产能的影响[J].天然气工业, 2017, 37(8):48-60.ZHANG Tao,LI Xiangfang,YANG Lifeng, et al. Effects of shut-in timing on flowback rate and productivity of shale gas wells[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(8)48-60.
    [34]GHANBARI E, ABBASI M A, DEHGHANPOUR H, et al. Flowback volumetric and chemical analysis for evaluating load recovery and its impact on early-time production[C]// SPE Unconventional Resources Conference Canada. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013.
    [35]ZHANG Yannan, EHLIG-ECONOMIDES C. Accounting for remaining injected fracturing fluid in shale gas wells[C]// Unconventional Resources Technology Conference,2014.
    [36]CLARKSON C R, WILLIAMS-KOVACS J D. Modeling two-phase flowback of multifractured horizontal wells completed in shale[J]. SPE Journal, 2013, 18(4):795-812.
    [37]WU J D, HUANG C Y, LIAO C C. Fracture strength characterization and failure analysis of silicon dies[J].Microelectronics Reliability, 2003, 43(2):269-277.
    [38]CRAFTON J W, GUNDERSON D W. Use of extremely high time-resolution production data to characterize hydraulic fracture properties[R].SPE 103591,2006.
    [39]WILLIAMS-KOVACS J D, CLARKSON C R, ZANGANEH B. Case studies in quantitative flowback analysis[C]//SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference,2015.
    [40]EZULIKE O D, DEHGHANPOUR H. Modelling flowback as a transient two-phase depletion process[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2014, 19(7):258-278.
    [41]LI Chunlou, LAFOLLETTE R, SOOKPRASONG A, et al.Characterization of hydraulic fracture geometry in shale gas reservoirs using early production data[C]//International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2013.
    [42]ALKOUH A, MCKETTA S, WATTENBARGER R A. Estimation of effective-fracture volume using water-flowback and production data for shale-gas wells[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2014, 53(5):290-303.
    [43]XU Yanmin, Adefidipe O, Dehghanpour H. A flowing material balance equation for two-phase flowback analysis[J].Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2016, 142(6):170-185.
    [44]WU Yushu,WANG Cong,DING Didier.Transient pressure analysis of gas wells in unconventional reservoirs[R].SPE 160889, 2012.
    [45]WANG Cong,WU Yushu. Characterizing hydraulic fractures in shale gas reservoirs using transient pressure tests[J].Petroleum, 2015, 1(2):133-138.
    [46]JIA P, CHENG L, CLARKSON C R, et al. Flow behavior analysis of two-phase (gas/water) flowback and early-time production from hydraulically-fractured shale gas wells using a hybrid numerical/analytical model[J].International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017.
    [47]FAKCHAROENPHOL P, TORCUK M, KAZEMI H, et al. Effect of shut-in time on gas flow rate in hydraulic fractured shale reservoirs[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 32(5):109-121.
    [48]KANFAR M S, CLARKSON C R. Reconciling flowback and production data: A novel history matching approach for liquid rich shale wells[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 33(6):1134-1148.
    [49]SHEN Weijun, XU Yanmei, LI Xizhe, et al. Numerical simulation of gas and water flow mechanism in hydraulically fractured shale gas reservoirs[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 35(9):726-735.
    [50]卞晓冰, 蒋廷学, 苏瑗,等. 裂缝参数对压裂后页岩气水平井排采影响[J].特种油气藏, 2014, 21(4):126-129.BIAN Xiaobing, JIANG Tingxue, SU Yuan, et al.Influence of fracture parameters on post-fracturing shale gas production in horizontal well[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2014, 21(4):126-129.
    [51]郭小哲, 王晶, 刘学锋. 页岩气储层压裂水平井气-水两相渗流模型[J].石油学报, 2016, 37(9):1165-1170.GUO Xiaozhe, WANG Jing, LIU Xuefeng.Gas-water two phase porous flow model of fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(9):1165-1170.
    [52]BENNION D B, THOMAS F B, BIETZ R F. Low permeability gas reservoirs:Problems, opportunities and solutions for drilling, completion, stimulation and production[C]//SPE Gas Technology Symposium,1996.
    [53]张涛, 李相方, 王永辉,等. 页岩储层特殊性质对压裂液返排率和产能的影响[J].天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6):828-838.ZHANG Tao, LI Xiangfang, WANG Yonghui, et al.Study on the effect of gas-shale reservoir special properties on the fracturing fluid recovery efficiency and production performance[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(6):828-838.
    [54]SHANLEY K W, CLUFF R M, ROBINSON J W. Factors controlling prolific gas production from low-permeability sandstone reservoirs:Implications for resource assessment, prospect development, and risk analysis[J].AAPG Bulletin, 2004, 88(8):1083-1121.
    [55]LAN Qing, Dehghanpour H, Wood J, et al. Wettability of the Montney tight gas formation[C]//SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference,2015.
    [56]XU Mingxiang,DEHGHANPOUR H. Advances in understanding wettability of gas shales[J].Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(7):4362-4375.
    [57]刘向君, 熊健, 梁利喜,等. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩润湿性分析及影响讨论[J].天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(10):1644-1652.LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi, et al.Analysis of the wettability of longmaxi formation shale in the south region of Sichuan Basin and its influence[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(10):1644-1652.
    [58]BERTONCELLO A, WALLACE J, BLYTON C, et al. Imbibition and water blockage in unconventional reservoirs:Well management implications during flowback and early production[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2014, 17(4):497-506.
    [59]刘乃震, 柳明, 张士诚. 页岩气井压后返排规律[J].天然气工业, 2015, 35(3):50-54.LIU Naizhen, LIU Ming, ZHANG Shicheng.Flowback patterns of fractured shale gas wells[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(3):50-54.
    [60]ZHANG Rui, LIU Shimin, WANG Yang. Fractal evolution under in situ pressure and sorption conditions for coal and shale[J].Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(8):8971.
    [61]卞晓冰, 蒋廷学, 卫然,等. 常压页岩气水平井压后排采控制参数优化[J].大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(5):170-174.BIAN Xiaobing, JIANG Tingxue, WEI Ran, et al.Optimization of the controlling parameters of the post-frac flowback and production for normal-pressure shale-gas horizontal wells[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(5):170-174.
    [62]李莉, 杜洋, 赵哲军,等. 页岩气井压后返排模式初探[J].中外能源, 2016, 21(6):31-34.LI Li, DU Yang, ZHAO Zhejun, et al.Preliminary research on flowback patterns of fractured shale gas wells[J].Sino-Global Energy, 2016, 21(6):31-34.
    [63]张孝玉. 建页HF-1井压裂及返排效果分析[J].天然气技术与经济, 2013,7(1):40-42.ZHANG Xiaoyu.Fracturing of Jianye HF-1 Well and its flowback effect analysis[J].Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2013,7(1):40-42.
    [64]张贵芳, 魏瑞玲, 祝真真,等. 页岩气水平井快速排液技术分析[J].中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2013(8):174.ZHANG Guifang, WEI Ruiling, ZHU Zhengzheng, et al.Analysis of rapid drainage technology for shale gas horizontal wells[J].China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2013(8):174.
    [65]曾小军, 刘飞, 朱铁栋,等. 双筒滤砂器在页岩气水平井钻塞返排中的应用探讨[J].钻采工艺, 2014, 37(4):54-56.ZENG Xiaojun, LIU Fei, ZHU Tiedong, et al.Application of two-compartment sand filter in plug-milling operation of shale gas horizontal well[J].Drilling & Production Technology, 2014, 37(4):54-56.
    [66]夏海帮, 袁航, 岑涛. 彭水区块页岩气生产井排采方式研究与应用[J].石油钻探技术, 2014(4):21-26.XIA Haibang, YUAN Hang, CEN Tao.Study and application of drainage methods for shale gas wells in Pengshui Block[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2014(4):21-26.
    [67]刘斌, 吴惠梅, 翟晓鹏. 涪陵页岩气井压裂后返排及生产特征研究[J].辽宁化工, 2015(10):1237-1239.LIU Bin,WU Huimei, ZHAI Xiaopeng. Research on fracturing flowback and production characteristics of Fuling shale gas wells[J].Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2015(10):1237-1239.
    [68]曾小军, 陆峰, 寇双峰. 四川富顺页岩气藏压裂改造模式及返排工艺分析[J].钻采工艺, 2016, 39(2):77-79.ZENG Xiaojun, LU Feng, KOU Shuangfeng.Analysis of fracturing and flowback technology in sichuan fushun shale gas reservoir[J].Drilling & Production Technology, 2016, 39(2):77-79.
    [69]刘飞, 潘登. 长宁-威远构造页岩气井返排流程优化设计和返排特征分析[J].油气井测试, 2016, 25(6):12-16.LIU Fei, FAN Deng. Optimization design and analysis of back flow characteristics of shale gas well in Changning-Weiyuan Structure[J].Well Testing, 2016, 25(6):12-16.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700