《増广注释音辩唐柳先生集》音切释义的来源及价值
|
摘要
采用统计法对《増广注释音辩唐柳先生集》的注释条目进行统计分析,以探究其注音释义的来源及价值。其注音释义一部分来源于前人陈说,一部分来源于注家自己经验的判断。其中的音切反映了宋代方言的语音现象,如声部的古无轻唇音、古无舌上音、浊音清化、韵部开合混切等,反映了宋代吴方言区的部分语音事实,是我们研究汉语语音发展的宝贵语料;其中的释义记载了唐代的历史文化史实,如唐代的历史事件、地理、礼仪、文化、官制等,是探究唐代历史及文化的文献资料。
To explore the origin and value of phonetic interpretation,the notes of Zengguang Zhushi Yinbian Tang Liu Xiansheng Ji were statistically analyzed.It points out that the annotations are derived from the reference of the former or the experience of the experts who giving notes to the book.The "fan qie"which reflects the localism phonetic phenomenon of the Song Dynasty is a valuable corpus for studying the development of Chinese phonetics,such as,there are no light labial and palatals in sound category in ancient China,the devoicing of voiced sound,and the combination of Kaikou and Hekou in rhyming category,etc.Its definition which records the historical and cultural facts of the Tang Dynasty is the historical data of the Tang Dynasty to explore the history of the Tang Dynasty,such as the historical events,historical geography,etiquette,culture and the bureaucratic system in it.
To explore the origin and value of phonetic interpretation,the notes of Zengguang Zhushi Yinbian Tang Liu Xiansheng Ji were statistically analyzed.It points out that the annotations are derived from the reference of the former or the experience of the experts who giving notes to the book.The "fan qie"which reflects the localism phonetic phenomenon of the Song Dynasty is a valuable corpus for studying the development of Chinese phonetics,such as,there are no light labial and palatals in sound category in ancient China,the devoicing of voiced sound,and the combination of Kaikou and Hekou in rhyming category,etc.Its definition which records the historical and cultural facts of the Tang Dynasty is the historical data of the Tang Dynasty to explore the history of the Tang Dynasty,such as the historical events,historical geography,etiquette,culture and the bureaucratic system in it.
引文
[1]郝桂敏.论宋代《诗经》学的主要发展阶段及其特点[J].沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版),2003(5):36.
[2]荀春荣.柳宗元诗文用韵[J].社会科学战线,1992(4):301-309.
[3]代艳.唐五代山西诗人用韵考[D].武汉:湖北大学,2003.
[4]郑剑英.陕西关中地区新出土唐代墓志铭文用韵考[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2011.
[5]潘瑾.唐代永济诗人用韵考[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2006.
[6]马草.论柳宗元以道为本的美学思想[J].沈阳大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):56-60.
[7]孟睿.论柳宗元被贬后山水游记中的色彩[J].沈阳大学学报,2005(5):105-107.
[8]王力.汉语史稿[M].中华书局,1980:35.
[9]绍荣芬.集韵音系简论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011:36.
[10]钱毅.从笔记、文集等历史文献看唐宋吴方言[J].社会科学家,2010(1):152.
[11]邱尚仁,李琦.南城方言字音和《广韵》的声韵调系统:声类的分析研究[J].汉字文化,2001(3):9.
[12]邓宏宇.基于众包模式的历史文献数字化系统研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2016.
[13]杨燕起,高国抗.中国历史文献学[M].修订本.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2003:5.
[2]荀春荣.柳宗元诗文用韵[J].社会科学战线,1992(4):301-309.
[3]代艳.唐五代山西诗人用韵考[D].武汉:湖北大学,2003.
[4]郑剑英.陕西关中地区新出土唐代墓志铭文用韵考[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2011.
[5]潘瑾.唐代永济诗人用韵考[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2006.
[6]马草.论柳宗元以道为本的美学思想[J].沈阳大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):56-60.
[7]孟睿.论柳宗元被贬后山水游记中的色彩[J].沈阳大学学报,2005(5):105-107.
[8]王力.汉语史稿[M].中华书局,1980:35.
[9]绍荣芬.集韵音系简论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2011:36.
[10]钱毅.从笔记、文集等历史文献看唐宋吴方言[J].社会科学家,2010(1):152.
[11]邱尚仁,李琦.南城方言字音和《广韵》的声韵调系统:声类的分析研究[J].汉字文化,2001(3):9.
[12]邓宏宇.基于众包模式的历史文献数字化系统研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2016.
[13]杨燕起,高国抗.中国历史文献学[M].修订本.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2003:5.