唐音、宋调的离合——论宋代闽地理学家的诗学之路
|
摘要
宋代闽地理学家经历了一个比较清晰的诗学之路。北宋时期到两宋之际的闽地理学家并没有诗风自立的倾向,诗歌创作兼具唐音及宋调。而到了两宋之交至南宋中期,随着闽地理学的兴盛,理学家在诗歌创作上初步呈现出语录体诗歌的特征。同时,对唐人诗的评价及接受也出现新变性。南宋中期以后,以真德秀为代表的"击壤派"理学家将诗歌散文化及诗教观极致化,为宣扬其道学服务,故此,无论是"理学家"诗体还是模仿唐人之作,都呈现出共同的风格特征,具有唐音、宋调合流的趋势。
The neo-Confucianists in Fujian experienced a clearer way to explore the path of poetic theories during the Song Dynasty. From the Northern Song Dynasty to the Southern Song's, these neo-Confucianists did not have their own poetic styles and poetry creation which include Tang sound and Song tune. In the middle term of the Southern Song, the Neo-Confucianism flourished in Fujian, and neo-Confucianists started to have the quotations of literature while they composed the poems. Meanwhile, there were new changes when these intelligentsia evaluated and accepted the Tang Dynasty's poetries. After the middle term of the Southern Song Dynasty, Neo-confucianists and its representive of Ji Rang School, Zhen Dexiu, started to conduct and upgrade the level of the poetic culture and poetic education to promote their neo-Confucianism values. Therefore, not only the style of poetry created by"neo-confucianists" but also the Tang Dynasty poetry imitations share the same characteristics which include the combination of Tang sound and Song tune.
The neo-Confucianists in Fujian experienced a clearer way to explore the path of poetic theories during the Song Dynasty. From the Northern Song Dynasty to the Southern Song's, these neo-Confucianists did not have their own poetic styles and poetry creation which include Tang sound and Song tune. In the middle term of the Southern Song, the Neo-Confucianism flourished in Fujian, and neo-Confucianists started to have the quotations of literature while they composed the poems. Meanwhile, there were new changes when these intelligentsia evaluated and accepted the Tang Dynasty's poetries. After the middle term of the Southern Song Dynasty, Neo-confucianists and its representive of Ji Rang School, Zhen Dexiu, started to conduct and upgrade the level of the poetic culture and poetic education to promote their neo-Confucianism values. Therefore, not only the style of poetry created by"neo-confucianists" but also the Tang Dynasty poetry imitations share the same characteristics which include the combination of Tang sound and Song tune.
引文
[1]王应麟.困学纪闻[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008:1662
[2]永瑢等.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[3]陈庆元.宋代闽中理学家诗文——从杨时到林希逸[J].福建师范大学学报,1995(2):56-63.
[4]骆锦恋.宋代闽地理学诗人诗歌理论与创作[J].集美大学学报,2010(1):96-99.
[5]杨时.续古逸丛书本:龟山先生语录(卷1)[M].扬州:广陵书社,2001.
[6]游酢.景印文渊阁四库全书本:游廌山集(卷1)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[7]黎靖德.朱子语类[M].王星贤,点校.北京:中华书局,1986.
[8]陈淳.景印文渊阁四库全书本:北溪先生大全集(卷14)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[9]林之奇.景印文渊阁四库全书本:拙斋文集(卷2)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[10]谢肇淛.珍本明诗话五种:小草斋诗话[M].张健,辑校.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
[11]许学夷.诗源辨体:卷二十三[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1987:241.
[12]祝尚书.论“击壤派”[J].文学遗产,2001(2):30-45.
[13]真德秀.景印文渊阁四库全书本:西山先生真文忠公文集[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[14]林希逸.景印文渊阁四库全书本:竹溪鬳斋十一稿续集[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[15]陈普.续修四库全书本:石堂遗集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:481.
[16]黄仲元.四部丛刊三编本:四如先生文稿[M].北京:商务印书馆,1935.
[17]陈普.景印文渊阁四库全书本:沧州尘缶编(自序)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[2]永瑢等.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,1965.
[3]陈庆元.宋代闽中理学家诗文——从杨时到林希逸[J].福建师范大学学报,1995(2):56-63.
[4]骆锦恋.宋代闽地理学诗人诗歌理论与创作[J].集美大学学报,2010(1):96-99.
[5]杨时.续古逸丛书本:龟山先生语录(卷1)[M].扬州:广陵书社,2001.
[6]游酢.景印文渊阁四库全书本:游廌山集(卷1)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[7]黎靖德.朱子语类[M].王星贤,点校.北京:中华书局,1986.
[8]陈淳.景印文渊阁四库全书本:北溪先生大全集(卷14)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[9]林之奇.景印文渊阁四库全书本:拙斋文集(卷2)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[10]谢肇淛.珍本明诗话五种:小草斋诗话[M].张健,辑校.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
[11]许学夷.诗源辨体:卷二十三[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1987:241.
[12]祝尚书.论“击壤派”[J].文学遗产,2001(2):30-45.
[13]真德秀.景印文渊阁四库全书本:西山先生真文忠公文集[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[14]林希逸.景印文渊阁四库全书本:竹溪鬳斋十一稿续集[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[15]陈普.续修四库全书本:石堂遗集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:481.
[16]黄仲元.四部丛刊三编本:四如先生文稿[M].北京:商务印书馆,1935.
[17]陈普.景印文渊阁四库全书本:沧州尘缶编(自序)[M].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.