执破衔接视阈下“执转破”要点透视及规范进路
|
摘要
《最高人民法院关于执行案件移送破产审查若干问题的指导意见》与《全国法院破产审判工作会议纪要》明晰了"执转破"的特质面向,规范了这一制度的操作路径。"执转破"高效、公平的制度优势及多元化的处理手段决定了这一制度是贯彻中央供给侧改革、淘汰"僵尸企业"、促进市场经济有序发展的重要举措。但囿于制度设计的原因,实践中这一制度并未充分发挥其应有功能。健全"执转破"的进路在于有效利用执破衔接机制,实现执行、破产程序的资源共享,扩大"执转破"的适用范围,改良"执转破"的启动模式及执行程序的财产调查方式,建构简易程序,从而最大程度地释放这一制度的潜能。
The Guiding Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Transfer of Bankruptcy of Cases and the Minutes of the National Court of Bankruptcy Trial Work clearly clarify the traits of "the process change from execution to bankruptcy" and standardize the operational path of this system. This system's efficient and fair institutional advantages and diversified management methods have determined that it is an important measure to implement the supply side reform,eliminate "zombie enterprises",and promote the orderly development of the market economy. However,due to some problems in the design of the system,this system did not fully play its due function. The method of perfecting this system is to effectively use the connection mechanism of execution and bankruptcy,realize the resource sharing of execution and bankruptcy procedures, expand the scope of application of this system,improve the startup mode of this system and the property investigation method of implementing procedures,and construct simple Procedures to maximize the potential of this system.
The Guiding Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Transfer of Bankruptcy of Cases and the Minutes of the National Court of Bankruptcy Trial Work clearly clarify the traits of "the process change from execution to bankruptcy" and standardize the operational path of this system. This system's efficient and fair institutional advantages and diversified management methods have determined that it is an important measure to implement the supply side reform,eliminate "zombie enterprises",and promote the orderly development of the market economy. However,due to some problems in the design of the system,this system did not fully play its due function. The method of perfecting this system is to effectively use the connection mechanism of execution and bankruptcy,realize the resource sharing of execution and bankruptcy procedures, expand the scope of application of this system,improve the startup mode of this system and the property investigation method of implementing procedures,and construct simple Procedures to maximize the potential of this system.
引文
[1]杜万华.充分认识执行案件依法移送破产审查工作重要意义[N].人民法院报,2016-12-10(2).
[2]Lon L. Fuller. The Morality of Law[M]. Yale University Press,1969. 46-94.
[3]范健,王建文.破产法[M].法律出版社,2009. 8.
[4]丁海湖,田飞.“执转破”操作模式及相关实务问题研究[J].法律适用,2017,(11):30.
[5]吴传颐.比较破产法[M].商务印书馆,2013. 159.
[6]王欣新.破产法专题研究[M].法律出版社,2002. 37.
[7]李永军.商法学[M].中国政法大学出版社,2007. 468.
[8]聂晶,方资.供给侧改革背景下破产审判存在的问题及对策研究[J].河北法学,2018,(2):196.
[9]王富博.关于《最高人民法院关于执行案件移送破产审查若干问题的指导意见》的解读[J].法律适用,2017,(11):5.
[10]王欣新.破产法[M].中国人民大学出版社,2013. 10-16.
[11]公丕祥.法理学[M].复旦大学出版社,2010. 71.
[12]徐阳光.执行与破产之功能界分与制度衔接[J].法律适用,2017,(11):22.
[13]沈德咏.最高人民法院民事诉讼司法解释理解与适用[M].人民法院出版社,2015. 1350.
[14]赵晋山,葛洪涛.《民事诉讼法》司法解释执行程序若干问题解读[J].法律适用,2015,(4):34.
[15]景汉朝,卢子娟.“执行难”及其对策[J].法学研究,2000,(5):125.
[16]李永军.破产法——理论与规范研究[M].中国政法大学出版社,2013. 8.
[17]王欣新.破产撤销权研究[J].中国法学,2007,(5):147.
[18]韩长印.破产程序的财产分配规则与价值增值规则——兼与个别执行制度的功能对比[J].法商研究,2002,(3):63.
[19]王一鸣,陈昌盛,李承健.正确理解供给侧结构性改革[N].人民日报,2016-03-29(7).
[20]韩长印.破产法学[M].中国政法大学出版社,2007. 10-13.
[21]刘振.探求破产重整案件的审判理念和规范——江苏法院破产重整案件审判工作总结交流会议综述[N].人民法院报,2010-09-15(7).
[22]王人博,程燎原.法治论[M].广西师范大学出版社,2014. 169.
[23]刘贵祥,黄金龙.平等分配制度与破产制度的分工[EB/OL].中国法院网:https://www. chinacourt.org/article/detail/2014/04/id/1285669. shtml,2018-10-17.
[24]王欣新.破产原因理论与实务研究[J].天津法学,2010,(1):17.
[25]孙静波.执行与破产程序相衔接立案实务研究[J].人民司法·应用版,2013,(7):4.
[26]李洁,闻远杰.“执转破”实施困境怎么解[N].人民法院报,2018-06-03(7).
[27]詹应国.执行与破产程序的衔接规范[J].人民司法,2016,(4):110.
[28]曹守晔,杨悦.执行程序与破产程序的衔接与协调[J].人民司法,2015,(21):27.
[29][美]理查德·波斯纳.蒋兆康译.法律的经济分析[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997. 31.
[30]章恒筑,王雄飞.论完善执行程序与破产程序衔接协调机制的若干问题——基于浙江法院的实践展开[J].法律适用,2017,(11):15.
[31]徐阳光,殷华.论简易破产程序的现实需求与制度设计[J].法律适用,2015,(7):104.
[32]刘旭东,陆晓燕.效益法则框架下“执转破”之功能透视及其制度建构[J].法律适用,2017,(11):42.
[2]Lon L. Fuller. The Morality of Law[M]. Yale University Press,1969. 46-94.
[3]范健,王建文.破产法[M].法律出版社,2009. 8.
[4]丁海湖,田飞.“执转破”操作模式及相关实务问题研究[J].法律适用,2017,(11):30.
[5]吴传颐.比较破产法[M].商务印书馆,2013. 159.
[6]王欣新.破产法专题研究[M].法律出版社,2002. 37.
[7]李永军.商法学[M].中国政法大学出版社,2007. 468.
[8]聂晶,方资.供给侧改革背景下破产审判存在的问题及对策研究[J].河北法学,2018,(2):196.
[9]王富博.关于《最高人民法院关于执行案件移送破产审查若干问题的指导意见》的解读[J].法律适用,2017,(11):5.
[10]王欣新.破产法[M].中国人民大学出版社,2013. 10-16.
[11]公丕祥.法理学[M].复旦大学出版社,2010. 71.
[12]徐阳光.执行与破产之功能界分与制度衔接[J].法律适用,2017,(11):22.
[13]沈德咏.最高人民法院民事诉讼司法解释理解与适用[M].人民法院出版社,2015. 1350.
[14]赵晋山,葛洪涛.《民事诉讼法》司法解释执行程序若干问题解读[J].法律适用,2015,(4):34.
[15]景汉朝,卢子娟.“执行难”及其对策[J].法学研究,2000,(5):125.
[16]李永军.破产法——理论与规范研究[M].中国政法大学出版社,2013. 8.
[17]王欣新.破产撤销权研究[J].中国法学,2007,(5):147.
[18]韩长印.破产程序的财产分配规则与价值增值规则——兼与个别执行制度的功能对比[J].法商研究,2002,(3):63.
[19]王一鸣,陈昌盛,李承健.正确理解供给侧结构性改革[N].人民日报,2016-03-29(7).
[20]韩长印.破产法学[M].中国政法大学出版社,2007. 10-13.
[21]刘振.探求破产重整案件的审判理念和规范——江苏法院破产重整案件审判工作总结交流会议综述[N].人民法院报,2010-09-15(7).
[22]王人博,程燎原.法治论[M].广西师范大学出版社,2014. 169.
[23]刘贵祥,黄金龙.平等分配制度与破产制度的分工[EB/OL].中国法院网:https://www. chinacourt.org/article/detail/2014/04/id/1285669. shtml,2018-10-17.
[24]王欣新.破产原因理论与实务研究[J].天津法学,2010,(1):17.
[25]孙静波.执行与破产程序相衔接立案实务研究[J].人民司法·应用版,2013,(7):4.
[26]李洁,闻远杰.“执转破”实施困境怎么解[N].人民法院报,2018-06-03(7).
[27]詹应国.执行与破产程序的衔接规范[J].人民司法,2016,(4):110.
[28]曹守晔,杨悦.执行程序与破产程序的衔接与协调[J].人民司法,2015,(21):27.
[29][美]理查德·波斯纳.蒋兆康译.法律的经济分析[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997. 31.
[30]章恒筑,王雄飞.论完善执行程序与破产程序衔接协调机制的若干问题——基于浙江法院的实践展开[J].法律适用,2017,(11):15.
[31]徐阳光,殷华.论简易破产程序的现实需求与制度设计[J].法律适用,2015,(7):104.
[32]刘旭东,陆晓燕.效益法则框架下“执转破”之功能透视及其制度建构[J].法律适用,2017,(11):42.