维特根斯坦:一个彻底的相对主义者?
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Wittgenstein: A Radical Relativist?
  • 作者:马芳芳
  • 英文作者:MA Fang-fang;School of Philosophy,Nankai University;
  • 关键词:枢轴命题 ; 世界图景 ; 确定性 ; 隐喻 ; 相对主义
  • 英文关键词:Hinges proposition;;World-picture;;Certainty;;Metaphor;;Relativism
  • 中文刊名:KXBZ
  • 英文刊名:Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
  • 机构:南开大学哲学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-05
  • 出版单位:科学技术哲学研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.204
  • 基金:南开大学博士研究生科研创新基金(330-96172067)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:KXBZ201903006
  • 页数:6
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:14-1354/G3
  • 分类号:34-39
摘要
关于维特根斯坦在确定性问题上是否持有一种相对主义立场,学术界存在一定争论。一些学者认为,对不同的世界图景的认同,表明维特根斯坦在确定性问题上坚持相对主义,应当将他视为一个相对主义者;另一方则主张,世界图景的可替代性所导致的相对主义不过是一种形而上学的可能性。事实上,维特根斯坦一方面肯定了枢轴命题和世界图景作为确定性所发挥的基础性作用,另一方面也承认这些作为确定性被接受下来的东西实际上都具有某种相对性。然而,承认确定的信念系统带有相对性并不等于在确定性问题上持有相对主义立场,更不能由此断定这种相对性会构成不同文化之间进行交流的障碍。相反,维特根斯坦认为,人类共同的行为方式为不同世界图景的交流提供了可能性。语言游戏和确定性的融合视角有助于摆脱相对主义问题的困扰。
        There are some debates in academia about whether Wittgenstein holds a position of relativism on certainty issue. Some scholars believe that the recognition of different world pictures suggests that Wittgenstein insists on relativism on certainty problem. We should regard Wittgenstein as a relativist. The other side of the debate thinks that the relativism caused by substitutability of world-pictures is just a kind of metaphysical possibility. Wittgenstein,in fact,on the one hand,affirms the fundamental role of hinges propositions and world pictures,which both can be regard as certainty; on the other hand,he acknowledges that these accepted as certainty things actually have some kind of relativity. However,recognizing the relativity of belief system isn't equal to be a relativism position on certainty problem,nor can it be concluded that this relativity will constitute an obstacle to communication between different cultures. Wittgenstein,on the contrary,argues that the common behavior of mankind provides a possibility of communication for different world pictures. The combination of certainty and language games can help to get rid of the problem of relativism.
引文
[1]BAGHRAMIAN M,CARTER J.Relativism[EB/OL].(2015-09-11)[2019-01-03].https:∥plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/relativism/.pdf.
    [2]REED B.Certainty[EB/OL].(2008-02-02)[2019-01-03].https:∥plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/certainty/.pdf.
    [3]维特根斯坦.维特根斯坦全集:第10卷[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2002.
    [4]马尔康姆.回忆维特根斯坦[M].北京:商务印书馆,2012:103.
    [5]MOYAL-SHARROCK D.Unravelling certainty[C]∥MOYAL-SHARROCK D,BRENNER W.Readings of Wittgenstein’s on certainty.New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2005:83.
    [6]STROLL A.Moore and Wittgenstein on certainty[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1994:46.
    [7]MAJETSCHAK S.Moore and the king.Wittgenstein on the groundlessness of world-pictures[C]∥WAGNER A,ARI-SO J.Rationality reconsidered.Ortega y Gasset and Wittgenstein on knowledge,belief,and practice.Berlin:Walter de Gruyter Gmb H,2016:99.
    [8]HALLER R.Was Wittgenstein a relativist?[C]∥EGIDIR.Wittgenstein:mind and language.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers,1995:229.
    [9]PLANT B.Religion,relativism,and Wittgenstein’s naturalism[J].International journal of philosophical studies,2011,19(2):193.
    [10]COLIVA A.Was Wittgenstein an epistemic relativist?[J].Philosophical investigations,2010,33(1):22.
    [11]维特根斯坦.哲学研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2012.
    [12]KOBER M.Certainties of a world picture:the epistemological investigations of on certainty[C]∥SLUGA H,STERND.The cambridge companion to Wittgenstein.New York:Cambridge University Press,1996:422-431.
    (1)Certainty一词一般译为确定性,在维特根斯坦的“On Certainty”一书中,国内一些学者也将其译为《论确实性》,由于这两种译法无本质差别,本文在此对译法的争议不做详细探讨。涉及译本时保留原译法“确实性”,其余情况统一使用“确定性”这一译法。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700