负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤患者中的临床效果评价
|
摘要
目的探究负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤患者中的临床效果。方法选取本院42例四肢创伤患者为研究对象,采用随机法将其分为常规组和实验组。常规组给予患者常规治疗,而实验组在常规组的治疗的基础上给予患者负压封闭引流术治疗。比较常规组患者和实验组患者的临床效果、并发症发生率、住院时间。结果实验组22例患者中,显效为15例、见效为6例、无效为1例,总有效率为95.45%;常规组20例患者中,显效为8例、见效为3例、无效为9例,总有效率为55.00%。实验组明显优于常规组,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组22例患者中,创口感染1例、损伤性休克0例、创口肿胀1例,并发症发生率为9.09%;常规组20例患者中,创口感染2例、损伤性休克3例、创口肿胀4例,并发症发生率为45.00%,实验组显著于常规组,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组患者的住院时间明显少于常规组患者,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床上对四肢创伤患者应用负压封闭引流技术治疗,能够有效提高患者的临床效果,降低患者并发症发生概率,缩短患者的住院时间,从而使得患者生活质量水平得到提高,值得推广。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of vacuum sealing drainage in limb trauma patients. Methods Forty-two patients with limb trauma in our hospital were selected as the research object and randomly divided into routine group and experimental group. The routine group was given routine treatment, while the experimental group was given negative pressure sealing drainage on the basis of routine treatment. The clinical effect, incidence of complications and hospitalization time of routine group and experimental group were compared. Results Of the 22 patients in the experimental group, 15 were markedly effective, 6 were effective, 1 was ineffective, and the total effective rate was 95.45%. Of the 20 patients in the conventional group, 8 were markedly effective, 3 were effective, 9 were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 55.00%. The experimental group was significantly better than the conventional group, with statistical significance(P<0.05). Among the 22 patients in the experimental group, there were 1 case of wound infection, 0 cases of traumatic shock, 1 case of wound swelling, and the incidence of complications was 9.09%. Among the 20 patients in the conventional group, there were 2 cases of wound infection, 3 cases of traumatic shock, 4 cases of wound swelling, and the incidence of complications was 45.00%. The experimental group was significantly higher than the conventional group, with statistical significance(P<0.05).The hospitalization time of the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the conventional group(P<0.05). Conclusion Negative pressure sealing drainage can effectively improve the clinical effect, reduce the incidence of complications, shorten the hospitalization time of patients Limb trauma, and improve the quality of life of patients, which is worthy of promotion.
Objective To explore the clinical effect of vacuum sealing drainage in limb trauma patients. Methods Forty-two patients with limb trauma in our hospital were selected as the research object and randomly divided into routine group and experimental group. The routine group was given routine treatment, while the experimental group was given negative pressure sealing drainage on the basis of routine treatment. The clinical effect, incidence of complications and hospitalization time of routine group and experimental group were compared. Results Of the 22 patients in the experimental group, 15 were markedly effective, 6 were effective, 1 was ineffective, and the total effective rate was 95.45%. Of the 20 patients in the conventional group, 8 were markedly effective, 3 were effective, 9 were ineffective, and the total effective rate was 55.00%. The experimental group was significantly better than the conventional group, with statistical significance(P<0.05). Among the 22 patients in the experimental group, there were 1 case of wound infection, 0 cases of traumatic shock, 1 case of wound swelling, and the incidence of complications was 9.09%. Among the 20 patients in the conventional group, there were 2 cases of wound infection, 3 cases of traumatic shock, 4 cases of wound swelling, and the incidence of complications was 45.00%. The experimental group was significantly higher than the conventional group, with statistical significance(P<0.05).The hospitalization time of the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the conventional group(P<0.05). Conclusion Negative pressure sealing drainage can effectively improve the clinical effect, reduce the incidence of complications, shorten the hospitalization time of patients Limb trauma, and improve the quality of life of patients, which is worthy of promotion.
引文
[1]苏福锦,王卡琳,黄国福,等.负压封闭引流技术在急诊四肢重度创伤软组织缺损修复中的应用[J].广西医科大学学报,2019,26(3):437-438.
[2]邹泽良,吴峰.负压封闭引流技术治疗四肢创伤软组织缺损创面的临床应用体会[J].当代医学,2019,18(1):94-95.
[3]唐绪文.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤患者中的临床效果及对创面愈合的影响研究[J].中国医学创新,2018,5(5):45-46.
[4]张云航,李海平,彭建.负压封闭引流技术在治疗四肢创伤软组织缺损的临床疗效[J].中国伤残医学,2019,25(7):67-68.
[5]段玉强.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤中的应用观察[J].现代养生,2019,2(4):124.
[6]王俊成.负压封闭引流技术治疗在四肢创伤复杂创面中的临床应用价值[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(70):78-79.
[7]唐贤钧.负压封闭引流术在骨科四肢创伤治疗中的临床效果分析[J].保健医学研究与实践,2019,12(3):39-41.
[8]罗建光,陈石玉,戚春潮,等.负压封闭引流技术应用于骨科创伤中的临床疗效分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2018,35(8):55-56.
[9]刘丹,陈子华.负压封闭引流技术治疗四肢创伤复杂创面的临床应用研究[J].中国卫生产业,2018,8(29):152.
[10]周平辉,张宝玉,张敬堂,等.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤后软组织缺损修复中的应用[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2019,38(2):164-166.
[11]钟孝政.负压封闭引流技术治疗四肢创伤复杂创面的临床应用研究[J].实用预防医学,2019,18(2):306-308.
[12]刘宝,李平,胡瑛.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤治疗中的应用[J].中国基层医药,2019,21(13):2037-2038.
[13]钟伟建,卢志有.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤性软组织缺损伤中的运用体会[J].中外医学研究,2019,5(3):121-122.
[14]张富平.负压封闭引流技术在骨科创伤患者治疗中的应用[J].基层医学论坛,2019,4(2):153-154.
[15]陈丽军.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤中的使用价值[J].医药前沿,2019,6(21):109-110.
[16]邓海棠,孔志强,张震乾.负压封闭引流技术用于四肢创伤复杂创面治疗价值评价[J].医学信息,2018,48(1):68-69.
[17]崔承志.负压封闭引流技术治疗在四肢创伤复杂创面的临床应用价值[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(70):92.
[18]王辞山.负压封闭引流技术在创伤骨科中的临床应用[J].中国医药指南,2018,8(24):547-548.
[2]邹泽良,吴峰.负压封闭引流技术治疗四肢创伤软组织缺损创面的临床应用体会[J].当代医学,2019,18(1):94-95.
[3]唐绪文.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤患者中的临床效果及对创面愈合的影响研究[J].中国医学创新,2018,5(5):45-46.
[4]张云航,李海平,彭建.负压封闭引流技术在治疗四肢创伤软组织缺损的临床疗效[J].中国伤残医学,2019,25(7):67-68.
[5]段玉强.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤中的应用观察[J].现代养生,2019,2(4):124.
[6]王俊成.负压封闭引流技术治疗在四肢创伤复杂创面中的临床应用价值[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2018,18(70):78-79.
[7]唐贤钧.负压封闭引流术在骨科四肢创伤治疗中的临床效果分析[J].保健医学研究与实践,2019,12(3):39-41.
[8]罗建光,陈石玉,戚春潮,等.负压封闭引流技术应用于骨科创伤中的临床疗效分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2018,35(8):55-56.
[9]刘丹,陈子华.负压封闭引流技术治疗四肢创伤复杂创面的临床应用研究[J].中国卫生产业,2018,8(29):152.
[10]周平辉,张宝玉,张敬堂,等.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤后软组织缺损修复中的应用[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2019,38(2):164-166.
[11]钟孝政.负压封闭引流技术治疗四肢创伤复杂创面的临床应用研究[J].实用预防医学,2019,18(2):306-308.
[12]刘宝,李平,胡瑛.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤治疗中的应用[J].中国基层医药,2019,21(13):2037-2038.
[13]钟伟建,卢志有.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤性软组织缺损伤中的运用体会[J].中外医学研究,2019,5(3):121-122.
[14]张富平.负压封闭引流技术在骨科创伤患者治疗中的应用[J].基层医学论坛,2019,4(2):153-154.
[15]陈丽军.负压封闭引流技术在四肢创伤中的使用价值[J].医药前沿,2019,6(21):109-110.
[16]邓海棠,孔志强,张震乾.负压封闭引流技术用于四肢创伤复杂创面治疗价值评价[J].医学信息,2018,48(1):68-69.
[17]崔承志.负压封闭引流技术治疗在四肢创伤复杂创面的临床应用价值[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(70):92.
[18]王辞山.负压封闭引流技术在创伤骨科中的临床应用[J].中国医药指南,2018,8(24):547-548.