国际关系“中国学派”的建构及其现代性反思
|
摘要
国际关系"中国学派"的号召兴盛于当前学界,这一方面体现出中国国际关系理论的发展,另一方面也不得不反思其建构"中国学派"的意图与方式。任何理论学派都应当遵循严谨的逻辑建构,即经由"问题导向"建立学派的理论体系,国际关系"中国学派"也当是如此。一种未曾基于"问题导向"与"逻辑框架"而简单地将中国传统文化与国际关系理论"生搬硬套"、呼吁创建学派的行为背后凸显的不仅是日益浮躁的学术氛围,更是学术界为现代化以来"利己导向"为主体的社会文化异化的结果。
"Chinese School" of international relations is flourishing in current academic circles. On the one hand, it reflects the development of China's international relations theory; on the other hand, we must reflect on the intention and way of constructing "Chinese School". Any theoretical school should follow a rigorous logical construction, that is, to establish the theoretical system of the school through "problem-oriented" pattern, and so should the "Chinese School" of international relations. There is a kind of behavior that has simply "copied" the traditional Chinese culture and the theory of international relations, not based on "problem orientation" and "logical framework". It is not only the result of increasingly impetuous academic atmosphere, but also the result of the social and cultural alienation in which the academic circles have taken the "self-interest orientation" as the main body since modernization.
"Chinese School" of international relations is flourishing in current academic circles. On the one hand, it reflects the development of China's international relations theory; on the other hand, we must reflect on the intention and way of constructing "Chinese School". Any theoretical school should follow a rigorous logical construction, that is, to establish the theoretical system of the school through "problem-oriented" pattern, and so should the "Chinese School" of international relations. There is a kind of behavior that has simply "copied" the traditional Chinese culture and the theory of international relations, not based on "problem orientation" and "logical framework". It is not only the result of increasingly impetuous academic atmosphere, but also the result of the social and cultural alienation in which the academic circles have taken the "self-interest orientation" as the main body since modernization.
引文
[1]秦亚青.权力·制度·文化——国际关系理论与方法研究文集[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2005.
[2]保建云.大同傅弈中的全球产业链分化重组[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2018(18):45-55.
[3]王逸舟.中国国际关系研究(1995-2005)[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2006.
[4]保建云.经贸摩擦中的美国焦虑[J].人民论坛, 2018(29):12-15.
[2]保建云.大同傅弈中的全球产业链分化重组[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2018(18):45-55.
[3]王逸舟.中国国际关系研究(1995-2005)[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 2006.
[4]保建云.经贸摩擦中的美国焦虑[J].人民论坛, 2018(29):12-15.