土地转出农户主观福祉现状及其影响因素分析——基于生计资本视角
|
摘要
研究目的:把握土地转出农户主观福祉现状,分析自然资本、人力资本、物质资本、金融资本、社会资本、生态资本和心理资本的7维生计资本对土地转出农户主观福祉影响规律。研究方法:对比分析法与有序响应模型。研究结果:(1)土地转出样本农户的主观福祉普遍较高,非农型农户对土地转出后自身生活质量的主观评价最高的比重最大,土地转出农户主观福祉整体上呈现中西部递减的趋势;(2)土地转出农户身体状况越好、拥有汽车或大型农机具数量越多、越易贷款、加入农民合作社、同村亲戚数量越多、土地地力越好、生活自信心越高、面对挫折抗压韧性越大,其主观福祉越高;(3)对纯农型农户主观福祉正向影响最大的因素为生态资本,对农业兼业型及非农型农户主观福祉正向影响最大的因素为心理资本,对非农兼业型农户主观福祉正向影响最大的因素为社会资本。研究结论:政府应加强医疗保障,完善农村生活基础设施,营造和谐的生活氛围,加大农村物质生活条件改善,重视对农村文化生活的建设,针对土地转出后的生计分化农户制定差别化政策。
The purpose of this paper is to grasp the status quo of subjective well-being of farmers transferring out the land, and to analyze the influence law of seven dimensional livelihood capitals, including natural capital, human capital,material capital, financial capital, social capital, ecological capital and psychological capital, on the subjective well-being.The research methods include comparative analysis and ordered response model. The research results show that:1)the subjective well-being of farmers transferring out land in the sample is generally higher, and non-agricultural farmers' subjective evaluation on their life quality has the highest proportion after transferring out land.In general,the subjective well-being of the farmers shows a trend of declining in the central and western regions. 2)Better health condition, larger number of cars or large agricultural machines, easier access to loan and rural cooperatives, more relatives in the same village, better land fertility, higher confidence of life and greater resilience to setbacks jointly contribute to higher subjective well-being. 3)Ecological capital has the greatest influence on the subjective wellbeing of pure farmers; psychological capital has the greatest influence on the subjective well-being of agricultural and non-agricultural farmers; social capital has the greatest positive impact on the subjective well-being of agricultural farmers. In conclusion, the government should strengthen medical insurance, improve infrastructure of rural life, create a harmonious living environment, upgrade material living conditions in rural areas, attach importance to the construction of cultural life in rural areas, and formulate differentiated policies for farmers whose livelihood is divided after land transfer.
The purpose of this paper is to grasp the status quo of subjective well-being of farmers transferring out the land, and to analyze the influence law of seven dimensional livelihood capitals, including natural capital, human capital,material capital, financial capital, social capital, ecological capital and psychological capital, on the subjective well-being.The research methods include comparative analysis and ordered response model. The research results show that:1)the subjective well-being of farmers transferring out land in the sample is generally higher, and non-agricultural farmers' subjective evaluation on their life quality has the highest proportion after transferring out land.In general,the subjective well-being of the farmers shows a trend of declining in the central and western regions. 2)Better health condition, larger number of cars or large agricultural machines, easier access to loan and rural cooperatives, more relatives in the same village, better land fertility, higher confidence of life and greater resilience to setbacks jointly contribute to higher subjective well-being. 3)Ecological capital has the greatest influence on the subjective wellbeing of pure farmers; psychological capital has the greatest influence on the subjective well-being of agricultural and non-agricultural farmers; social capital has the greatest positive impact on the subjective well-being of agricultural farmers. In conclusion, the government should strengthen medical insurance, improve infrastructure of rural life, create a harmonious living environment, upgrade material living conditions in rural areas, attach importance to the construction of cultural life in rural areas, and formulate differentiated policies for farmers whose livelihood is divided after land transfer.
引文
[1]林联凤.促进社会公平正义增进人民福祉——学习党的十八届三中全会《决定》的一点体会[J].求实,2014(增刊):36-39.
[2]齐睿,郭明晶,周涛,等.被征地农民征地听证会满意度影响因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(6):13-20.
[3]陈美球,廖彩荣,刘桃菊.乡村振兴、集体经济组织与土地使用制度创新——基于江西黄溪村的实践分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(2):27-34,158.
[4]张建,冯淑怡,诸培新.政府干预农地流转市场会加剧农村内部收入差距吗?——基于江苏省四个县的调研[J].公共管理学报,2017,14(1):104-116,158-159.
[5]陈璐,甘臣林,梅昀,等. CSI理论框架下农户农地转出满意度影响因素分析——以武汉城市圈典型地区调查为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(2):67-76.
[6]张海洋,耿广杰.生活满意度与家庭金融资产选择[J].中央财经大学学报,2017(3):48-58.
[7]王子侨,石育中,杨新军,等.外部社会资本视角下的黄土高原农户生活满意度研究——以陕西省长武县洪家镇为例[J].干旱区地理,2017,40(6):1317-1327.
[8]张仕超,郑栋升,蒋佳佳.土地流转农户生计转型中生计资本整合特征及效益[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(12):274-281.
[9]DE S A, VANWEY L K, MCSWEENEY K, et al. Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2008, 18(1):38-53.
[10]王雨蒙,徐健贤,姚炜航.子女数量对中老年人生活满意度的影响研究——基于城乡间和两性间的比较[J].农林经济管理学报,2016,15(6):735-742.
[11]张若恬,张丹,李树茁.当代中国老年人养老资本、策略与福祉——基于2014年中国老年社会追踪调查数据的分析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2018,38(4):72-83.
[12]安海燕,张树锋.农民工社会资本对生活满意度影响研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(4):67-72,112.
[13]蔡银莺,朱兰兰.生计资产差异对农民生活满意度的影响分析——以成都市双流县和崇州市为例[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(1):30-38.
[14]赵雪雁,毛笑文.社会资本对农户生活满意度的影响——基于甘肃省的调查数据[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(5):1040-1048.
[15]李静,王月金.健康与农民主观福祉的关系分析——基于全国5省(区)1000个农户的调查[J].中国农村经济,2015(10):80-88.
[16]白描,吴国宝.农民主观福祉现状及其影响因素分析——基于5省10县农户调查资料[J].中国农村观察,2017(1):41-51,141-142.
[17]韦惠兰,王光耀.沙化土地治理区农户生活满意度及影响因素分析——基于甘肃省12县域调查数据[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(4):1-8.
[18]赵文娟,杨世龙,王潇.基于Logistic回归模型的生计资本与生计策略研究——以云南新平县干热河谷傣族地区为例[J].资源科学,2016,38(1):136-143.
[19]陈美球,袁东波,邝佛缘,等.农户分化、代际差异对生态耕种采纳度的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(2):79-86.
[20]谢晋,蔡银莺.农户生计资产与耕地保护补偿政策效应的动态响应——以成都市耕地保护基金为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(8):15-23.
[21]邝佛缘,陈美球,鲁燕飞,等.生计资本对农户耕地保护意愿的影响分析——以江西省587份问卷为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(2):58-66.
[22]陆学艺.“三农”新论:当前中国农业农村农民问题研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005:34-38.
[23]张佰林,杨庆媛,苏康传,等.基于生计视角的异质性农户转户退耕决策研究[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(2):170-180.
[24]李广东,邱道持,王利平,等.生计资产差异对农户耕地保护补偿模式选择的影响——渝西方山丘陵不同地带样点村的实证分析[J].地理学报,2012,67(4):504-515.
[25]胡晨成.基于农户生计视角的三峡库区农村土地流转问题研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2016:45-47.
[26]李小云,董强,饶小龙,等.农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用[J].中国农村经济,2007(4):32-39.
[27]李磊,贾磊,赵晓雪,等.层次分析—熵值定权法在城市水环境承载力评价中的应用[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(4):456-460.
[2]齐睿,郭明晶,周涛,等.被征地农民征地听证会满意度影响因素研究[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(6):13-20.
[3]陈美球,廖彩荣,刘桃菊.乡村振兴、集体经济组织与土地使用制度创新——基于江西黄溪村的实践分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(2):27-34,158.
[4]张建,冯淑怡,诸培新.政府干预农地流转市场会加剧农村内部收入差距吗?——基于江苏省四个县的调研[J].公共管理学报,2017,14(1):104-116,158-159.
[5]陈璐,甘臣林,梅昀,等. CSI理论框架下农户农地转出满意度影响因素分析——以武汉城市圈典型地区调查为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(2):67-76.
[6]张海洋,耿广杰.生活满意度与家庭金融资产选择[J].中央财经大学学报,2017(3):48-58.
[7]王子侨,石育中,杨新军,等.外部社会资本视角下的黄土高原农户生活满意度研究——以陕西省长武县洪家镇为例[J].干旱区地理,2017,40(6):1317-1327.
[8]张仕超,郑栋升,蒋佳佳.土地流转农户生计转型中生计资本整合特征及效益[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(12):274-281.
[9]DE S A, VANWEY L K, MCSWEENEY K, et al. Rural household demographics, livelihoods and the environment[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2008, 18(1):38-53.
[10]王雨蒙,徐健贤,姚炜航.子女数量对中老年人生活满意度的影响研究——基于城乡间和两性间的比较[J].农林经济管理学报,2016,15(6):735-742.
[11]张若恬,张丹,李树茁.当代中国老年人养老资本、策略与福祉——基于2014年中国老年社会追踪调查数据的分析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2018,38(4):72-83.
[12]安海燕,张树锋.农民工社会资本对生活满意度影响研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2015,36(4):67-72,112.
[13]蔡银莺,朱兰兰.生计资产差异对农民生活满意度的影响分析——以成都市双流县和崇州市为例[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(1):30-38.
[14]赵雪雁,毛笑文.社会资本对农户生活满意度的影响——基于甘肃省的调查数据[J].干旱区地理,2015,38(5):1040-1048.
[15]李静,王月金.健康与农民主观福祉的关系分析——基于全国5省(区)1000个农户的调查[J].中国农村经济,2015(10):80-88.
[16]白描,吴国宝.农民主观福祉现状及其影响因素分析——基于5省10县农户调查资料[J].中国农村观察,2017(1):41-51,141-142.
[17]韦惠兰,王光耀.沙化土地治理区农户生活满意度及影响因素分析——基于甘肃省12县域调查数据[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(4):1-8.
[18]赵文娟,杨世龙,王潇.基于Logistic回归模型的生计资本与生计策略研究——以云南新平县干热河谷傣族地区为例[J].资源科学,2016,38(1):136-143.
[19]陈美球,袁东波,邝佛缘,等.农户分化、代际差异对生态耕种采纳度的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(2):79-86.
[20]谢晋,蔡银莺.农户生计资产与耕地保护补偿政策效应的动态响应——以成都市耕地保护基金为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(8):15-23.
[21]邝佛缘,陈美球,鲁燕飞,等.生计资本对农户耕地保护意愿的影响分析——以江西省587份问卷为例[J].中国土地科学,2017,31(2):58-66.
[22]陆学艺.“三农”新论:当前中国农业农村农民问题研究[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005:34-38.
[23]张佰林,杨庆媛,苏康传,等.基于生计视角的异质性农户转户退耕决策研究[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(2):170-180.
[24]李广东,邱道持,王利平,等.生计资产差异对农户耕地保护补偿模式选择的影响——渝西方山丘陵不同地带样点村的实证分析[J].地理学报,2012,67(4):504-515.
[25]胡晨成.基于农户生计视角的三峡库区农村土地流转问题研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2016:45-47.
[26]李小云,董强,饶小龙,等.农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用[J].中国农村经济,2007(4):32-39.
[27]李磊,贾磊,赵晓雪,等.层次分析—熵值定权法在城市水环境承载力评价中的应用[J].长江流域资源与环境,2014,23(4):456-460.