日照市村落地名景观分析
|
摘要
地名作为一种非物质文化遗产,是一种复杂的社会人文现象.以日照市具有详细来源信息的村落地名为研究对象,运用文献查阅、数理统计和GIS等方法,对地名进行分类的基础上,探讨地名与自然和人文要素之间的关系,分析村落地名的区域景观特征.研究发现:地名的分类与自然环境、人文地理要素关系密切.日照市自然类地名景观在空间上表现为以五莲县中西部为主核心、莒县东北部为次核心向东港区和岚山区沿海一带扩散,与日照市地势形态空间特征相吻合;人文类地名景观在空间上表现为以莒县南部为主核心,五莲县中东部为次核心,莒县北部和岚山区北部相对集中的格局,反映了日照市人文历史演化由西向东、由陆地向临海扩展的空间特征.总体上,村落地名景观在空间上表现为以五莲县中南部、莒县中西部为主核心,东港区和岚山区交界地区为次核心向周围地区扩散,体现了区域自然要素空间态势与人文演化的复合空间形态特征.
As a kind of intangible cultural heritage,place name is a complex social and cultural phenomenon.With detailed source information of village names in Rizhao,literature review,mathematical statistics and GIS are used to explore the relationship between the natural and human factors and analyze the regional landscape characteristics of village name on the basis of classifying place names. It is found that the classification of the place names has a close relationship with natural environment and human geography factors. Natural place names have spatial distribution features with Wulian as the main core in the midwest area and Juxian as the second core in the northeast area spreading to the coastal area in Donggang district and Lanshan district,in conformity with the terrain configuration space characteristic in Rizhao. Human place names have spatial distribution features with Juxian as the main core in the south area,Wulian as the second core in the mideast area,and relatively concentrate in the north area of Juxian and Lanshan district,which reflects the spatial characteristics of the human evolution history from west to east extending from land to the littoral. As a whole,the spatial distribution characteristics of village place names have the main core of Wulian in the south central and Juxian in the midwest area and the second core of the border region of Donggang district and Lanshan district spreading to the surrounding area,which reflects the evolution of natural factors and human factors interaction in the area.
As a kind of intangible cultural heritage,place name is a complex social and cultural phenomenon.With detailed source information of village names in Rizhao,literature review,mathematical statistics and GIS are used to explore the relationship between the natural and human factors and analyze the regional landscape characteristics of village name on the basis of classifying place names. It is found that the classification of the place names has a close relationship with natural environment and human geography factors. Natural place names have spatial distribution features with Wulian as the main core in the midwest area and Juxian as the second core in the northeast area spreading to the coastal area in Donggang district and Lanshan district,in conformity with the terrain configuration space characteristic in Rizhao. Human place names have spatial distribution features with Juxian as the main core in the south area,Wulian as the second core in the mideast area,and relatively concentrate in the north area of Juxian and Lanshan district,which reflects the spatial characteristics of the human evolution history from west to east extending from land to the littoral. As a whole,the spatial distribution characteristics of village place names have the main core of Wulian in the south central and Juxian in the midwest area and the second core of the border region of Donggang district and Lanshan district spreading to the surrounding area,which reflects the evolution of natural factors and human factors interaction in the area.
引文
[1]赵荣,王恩涌,张小林,等.人文地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:257-258.
[2]王扬.城市地名景观研究—以南京城老城区为例[D].南京:南京农业大学,2011:18-22.
[3]李建华,米文宝,冯翠月,等.基于GIS的宁夏中卫县地名文化景观分析[J].人文地理,2011,26(1):100-104.
[4]B.A.Жучкевич著,崔志升译.普通地名学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1983:3-73.
[5]孙冬虎.华北平原城镇地名群的发展及其地理分布特征[J].地理研究,1990,9(3):49-56.
[6]孙冬虎.中国地名学史[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.
[7]孙冬虎.南海诸岛外来地名的命名背景及其历史影响[J].地理研究,2000,19(2):217-224.
[8]华林甫.论郦道元《水经注》的地名学贡献[J].地理研究,1998,17(2):193-200.
[9]华林甫.中国地名学史考论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.
[10]华林甫.中国地名学源流[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2002.
[11]Stephen C Jett.Place-naming,environment,and perception among the Canyon de Chelly Navajo of Arizona[J].Professional Geographer,1997,49(4):481-493.
[12]Sandred Karl Inge.English stead-a changeable place-name element in a changing community[J].Studia Neophilologica,2001,73(2):164-170.
[13]Gill Graeme.Changing symbols:The renovation of Moscow place names[J].Russian Review,2005,64(3):480-503.
[14]王彬,岳辉.GIS支持的广东地名景观EOF模型分析[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):281-287.
[15]王彬,司徒尚纪.基于GIS的广东地名景观分析[J].地理研究,2007,26(2):238-248.
[16]王彬,黄秀莲,司徒尚纪.广东地名语言文化空间结构及景观特征分析[J].人文地理,2012,27(1):39-44.
[17]李亚娟,陈田,王婧,等.中国历史文化名村的时空分布特征及成因[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1477-1485.
[18]陈晨,修春亮,陈伟,等.基于GIS的北京地名文化景观空间分布特征及其成因[J].地理科学,2014,34(4):420-429.
[19]付长良,范晨芳.地名规划概论[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2011:179-186.
[20]刘江伟.地名文化是全人类的共同财富—访中国地名文化遗产保护促进会会长刘保全[N].光明日报,2015-4-24(2).
[21]胡其峰.保护地名遗产,延续历史文脉—全国地名文化建设研讨会发言摘登[N].光明日报,2015-5-29(5).
[22]任欢.我国部署地名文化保护工作[N].光明日报,2016-3-23(1).
[23]刘红军.日照地区龙山文化[M].济南:山东友谊出版社,2006:1-80.
[24]冯永忠,孙月恒.山东省地名志[M].山东:山东省地图出版社,1999:1066-1115.
[25]单亦灵.五莲县地名文化探究[M].北京:中国文史出版社,2014:177-179.
[26]褚亚平,尹钧科,孙冬虎.地名学基础教程[M].北京:测绘出版社,2009:28-165.
[27]孙冬虎.地名史源学概论[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2008:89-97.
[28]刘保全,杨光浴,谢前明,等.地名调查学概论[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2009:13-35.
[29]李鹏,封丹.地名变迁中的文化政治阐释—以从化温泉为例[J].人文地理,2015,130(2):58-64.
[30]李金良,张雪英,樊晓春.汉语地名时空信息的一体化表达[J].地理与地理信息科学,2010,26(6):6-10.
[31]杨继玉.信阳地名的语言文化研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2011:1-7.
[2]王扬.城市地名景观研究—以南京城老城区为例[D].南京:南京农业大学,2011:18-22.
[3]李建华,米文宝,冯翠月,等.基于GIS的宁夏中卫县地名文化景观分析[J].人文地理,2011,26(1):100-104.
[4]B.A.Жучкевич著,崔志升译.普通地名学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1983:3-73.
[5]孙冬虎.华北平原城镇地名群的发展及其地理分布特征[J].地理研究,1990,9(3):49-56.
[6]孙冬虎.中国地名学史[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.
[7]孙冬虎.南海诸岛外来地名的命名背景及其历史影响[J].地理研究,2000,19(2):217-224.
[8]华林甫.论郦道元《水经注》的地名学贡献[J].地理研究,1998,17(2):193-200.
[9]华林甫.中国地名学史考论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.
[10]华林甫.中国地名学源流[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2002.
[11]Stephen C Jett.Place-naming,environment,and perception among the Canyon de Chelly Navajo of Arizona[J].Professional Geographer,1997,49(4):481-493.
[12]Sandred Karl Inge.English stead-a changeable place-name element in a changing community[J].Studia Neophilologica,2001,73(2):164-170.
[13]Gill Graeme.Changing symbols:The renovation of Moscow place names[J].Russian Review,2005,64(3):480-503.
[14]王彬,岳辉.GIS支持的广东地名景观EOF模型分析[J].地理科学,2007,27(2):281-287.
[15]王彬,司徒尚纪.基于GIS的广东地名景观分析[J].地理研究,2007,26(2):238-248.
[16]王彬,黄秀莲,司徒尚纪.广东地名语言文化空间结构及景观特征分析[J].人文地理,2012,27(1):39-44.
[17]李亚娟,陈田,王婧,等.中国历史文化名村的时空分布特征及成因[J].地理研究,2013,32(8):1477-1485.
[18]陈晨,修春亮,陈伟,等.基于GIS的北京地名文化景观空间分布特征及其成因[J].地理科学,2014,34(4):420-429.
[19]付长良,范晨芳.地名规划概论[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2011:179-186.
[20]刘江伟.地名文化是全人类的共同财富—访中国地名文化遗产保护促进会会长刘保全[N].光明日报,2015-4-24(2).
[21]胡其峰.保护地名遗产,延续历史文脉—全国地名文化建设研讨会发言摘登[N].光明日报,2015-5-29(5).
[22]任欢.我国部署地名文化保护工作[N].光明日报,2016-3-23(1).
[23]刘红军.日照地区龙山文化[M].济南:山东友谊出版社,2006:1-80.
[24]冯永忠,孙月恒.山东省地名志[M].山东:山东省地图出版社,1999:1066-1115.
[25]单亦灵.五莲县地名文化探究[M].北京:中国文史出版社,2014:177-179.
[26]褚亚平,尹钧科,孙冬虎.地名学基础教程[M].北京:测绘出版社,2009:28-165.
[27]孙冬虎.地名史源学概论[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2008:89-97.
[28]刘保全,杨光浴,谢前明,等.地名调查学概论[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2009:13-35.
[29]李鹏,封丹.地名变迁中的文化政治阐释—以从化温泉为例[J].人文地理,2015,130(2):58-64.
[30]李金良,张雪英,樊晓春.汉语地名时空信息的一体化表达[J].地理与地理信息科学,2010,26(6):6-10.
[31]杨继玉.信阳地名的语言文化研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2011:1-7.