中国森林生态系统地表径流调节特征
|
摘要
径流调节是森林生态系统重要生态服务功能之一,包含着大气、水分、植被和土壤等生物物理过程,其变化将直接影响区域气候水文、植被和土壤等状况,是区域生态系统状况的重要指示器。在区域尺度上评估森林生态系统地表径流特征,对于科学认识和合理保护森林生态系统水源涵养功能具有重要意义。以森林生态系统定位监测数据为基础,探讨地表径流与降水,径流系数与植被的关系,建立径流系数与植被的回归方程,分析全国森林生态系统地表径流调节特征。结果表明:(1)各森林类型地表径流与降水相关性显著,其对地表径流的影响为37%—76%。此外,径流系数与植被也显著相关,其对径流系数的解释能力为27%—47%。(2)基于植被覆盖数据,通过植被与径流系数回归方程估算全国森林生态系统的地表径流调节特征。全国各森林生态系统径流调节能力存在差异,强弱顺序为:落叶针叶林>落叶阔叶林>针阔混交林>常绿针叶林>常绿阔叶林。
Run-off regulation is an important forest ecosystem service. It is involved in natural processes,such as regional climate circulation,the hydrological cycle,vegetation growth,soil conditions,and other natural processes. It is also an important indicator of regional ecosystem status change. Water resources in China are limited,and precipitation is uneven over time and space. Many researchers have attributed the water conservation loss in China to long-term human interference and widespread conversions of land use and land cover. Previous studies have found that climate conditions,such as drought,severe storms,and temperature uctuations,are the primary cause of water conservation change. Therefore,the current forest run-off regulation characteristics and their relationships with precipitation,surface run-off,and vegetation need to be investigated if water conservation levels are to improve. To date,many reviews of paired catchment studies have only observed the changes in run-off characteristics over a couple of years. A few studies have used paired catchment results to predict the hydrological responses to permanent vegetation change. A comparison of the long term annual results from regrowth,deforestation,and afforestation experiments have shown that it takes more than 5 years for a catchment to reach a new equilibrium after permanent changes in vegetation have taken place. However,deforestation experiments reach a new equilibrium earlier than afforestation experiments. Paired catchment studies have successfully revealed relationships between the percentage vegetation change and associated hydrological characteristics in relatively small catchments. The relationship between run-off and precipitation becomes significant when seasonal storms and / or rain precipitation are included in the analysis. Previous plot scale studies have also shown that vegetation reduced runoff compared to farmland and grassland ecosystems. At the catchment scale,paired catchment studies have also shown that afforestation further reduces run-off,but the hydrological responses associated with rainfall-runoff processes are very complicated. This investigation used a literature review,statistical regression,and geographic information system analyses to study the run-off characteristics of different forest ecosystems and has developed a run-off regulation regression model for ecosystems at the regional scale. We quantied the run-off regulation characteristics of forest ecosystems in China,and compared the regulation characteristics of different types of ecosystems. Our main conclusions are(1) There is a significant correlation between precipitation and surface runoff in different forest ecosystems,and there is a correlation between vegetation cover and the run-off coefficient. The proposed run-off regulation functions were based on the regression analysis of a large amount of measured data obtained from the literature.(2) The run-off regulation characteristics for forest ecosystems were calculated over 11 years(2000—2010)using vegetation data for China and a statistical regression function. The forest ecosystems had different run-off regulation functions. The run-off regulation capability decreased in the following way: deciduous coniferous forest > mixed deciduous broadleaf forest > mixed broadleaf-conifer forest > evergreen coniferous forest > evergreen broadleaf forest.
Run-off regulation is an important forest ecosystem service. It is involved in natural processes,such as regional climate circulation,the hydrological cycle,vegetation growth,soil conditions,and other natural processes. It is also an important indicator of regional ecosystem status change. Water resources in China are limited,and precipitation is uneven over time and space. Many researchers have attributed the water conservation loss in China to long-term human interference and widespread conversions of land use and land cover. Previous studies have found that climate conditions,such as drought,severe storms,and temperature uctuations,are the primary cause of water conservation change. Therefore,the current forest run-off regulation characteristics and their relationships with precipitation,surface run-off,and vegetation need to be investigated if water conservation levels are to improve. To date,many reviews of paired catchment studies have only observed the changes in run-off characteristics over a couple of years. A few studies have used paired catchment results to predict the hydrological responses to permanent vegetation change. A comparison of the long term annual results from regrowth,deforestation,and afforestation experiments have shown that it takes more than 5 years for a catchment to reach a new equilibrium after permanent changes in vegetation have taken place. However,deforestation experiments reach a new equilibrium earlier than afforestation experiments. Paired catchment studies have successfully revealed relationships between the percentage vegetation change and associated hydrological characteristics in relatively small catchments. The relationship between run-off and precipitation becomes significant when seasonal storms and / or rain precipitation are included in the analysis. Previous plot scale studies have also shown that vegetation reduced runoff compared to farmland and grassland ecosystems. At the catchment scale,paired catchment studies have also shown that afforestation further reduces run-off,but the hydrological responses associated with rainfall-runoff processes are very complicated. This investigation used a literature review,statistical regression,and geographic information system analyses to study the run-off characteristics of different forest ecosystems and has developed a run-off regulation regression model for ecosystems at the regional scale. We quantied the run-off regulation characteristics of forest ecosystems in China,and compared the regulation characteristics of different types of ecosystems. Our main conclusions are(1) There is a significant correlation between precipitation and surface runoff in different forest ecosystems,and there is a correlation between vegetation cover and the run-off coefficient. The proposed run-off regulation functions were based on the regression analysis of a large amount of measured data obtained from the literature.(2) The run-off regulation characteristics for forest ecosystems were calculated over 11 years(2000—2010)using vegetation data for China and a statistical regression function. The forest ecosystems had different run-off regulation functions. The run-off regulation capability decreased in the following way: deciduous coniferous forest > mixed deciduous broadleaf forest > mixed broadleaf-conifer forest > evergreen coniferous forest > evergreen broadleaf forest.
引文
[1]Núnez D,Nahuelhual L,Oyarzún C.Forests and water:the value of native temperate forests in supplying water for human consumption.Ecological Economics,2006,58(3):606-616.
[2]Dudley N,Stolton S.Running Pure:the Importance of Forest Protected Areas to Drinking Water:A Research Report for the World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use.World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use,2003.(
[3]欧阳志云,赵同谦,赵景柱,肖寒,王效科.海南岛生态系统生态调节功能及其生态经济价值研究.应用生态学报,2004,15(8):1395-1402.
[4]Daily G C.Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems.4th ed.Washington,DC:Island Press,1997.
[5]刘世荣,孙鹏森,温远光.中国主要森林生态系统水文功能的比较研究(英文).植物生态学报,2003,27(1):16-22.
[6]李文华,何永涛,杨丽韫.森林对径流影响研究的回顾与展望.自然资源学报,2001,16(5):398-406.
[7]张诚,严登华,郝彩莲,秦天玲,王凌河.水的生态服务功能研究进展及关键支撑技术.水科学进展,2011,22(1):126-134.
[8]Jiapaer G L,Chen X,Bao A M.A comparison of methods for estimating fractional vegetation cover in arid regions.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2011,151(12):1698-1710.
[9]中国科学院中国植被图编辑委员会.中国植被及其地理格局:中华人民共和国植被图(1:1000000)说明书.北京:地质出版社,2007.
[10]吴炳方,苑全治,颜长珍,王宗明,于信芳,李爱农,马荣华,黄进良,陈劲松,常存,刘成林,张磊,李晓松,曾源,包安明.21世纪前十年的中国土地覆盖变化.第四纪研究,2014,34(4):723-731.
[11]Zhou G Y,Wei X H,Luo Y,Zhang M F,Li Y L,Qiao Y N,Liu H G,Wang C L.Forest recovery and river discharge at the regional scale of Guangdong Province,China.Water Resources Research,2010,46(9),doi:10.1029/2009WR008829.
[12]Du J,Shi C X,Zhang C D.Modeling and analysis of effects of precipitation and vegetation coverage on runoff and sediment yield in Jinsha River Basin.Water Science and Engineering,2013,6(1):44-58.
[13]曹云,欧阳志云,郑华,黄志刚,邢芳芳.森林生态系统的水文调节功能及生态学机制研究进展.生态环境,2006,15(6):1360-1365.
[14]申彦科,王玉杰,齐娜,杨小梅,李耀明,成晨.重庆市缙云山不同林分对坡面产流的影响.水土保持通报,2009,29(5):80-84.
[15]张晓明,孙中锋,张学培.晋西黄土残塬沟壑区不同林分暴雨产流产沙作用分析.中国水土保持科学,2003,1(3):37-42.
[16]段文标,刘少冲.莲花湖库区水源涵养林林地产流产沙分析.水土保持学报,2006,20(5):12-15.
[17]姜萍,郭芳,罗跃初,魏晶,孙晓伟,吴钢.辽西半干旱区典型人工林生态系统的水土保持功能.应用生态学报,2007,18(12):2905-2909.
[18]潘磊,唐万鹏,黄志霖,史玉虎,马德举,崔鸿侠.长江三峡花岗岩区典型林地暴雨径流特征研究.湖北林业科技,2010,(1):1-4.
[19]黄承标,温远光,李信贤.田林老山常绿落叶阔叶混交林气候及水文效应的研究.广西农学院学报,1991,10(4):52-63.
[20]张喜,薛建辉,许效天,连宾,李克之.黔中喀斯特山地不同森林类型的地表径流及影响因素.热带亚热带植物学报,2008,15(6):527-537.
[21]张洪江,孙艳红,程云,程金花.重庆缙云山不同植被类型对地表径流系数的影响.水土保持学报,2006,20(6):11-13,45-45.
[22]温熙胜,何丙辉,张洪江,何凡,缪驰远.三峡库区缓坡林地产流初探.西南大学学报:自然科学版,2007,29(5):74-80.
[23]祁生林,张洪江,何凡,程金花.重庆四面山植被类型对坡面产流的影响.中国水土保持科学,2006,4(4):33-38.
[24]李耀明,王玉杰,储小院,成晨,齐娜.降雨因子对缙云山地区典型森林植被类型地表径流的影响.水土保持研究,2009,16(4):244-249.
[25]席光超,齐实,王云琦.三峡库区典型森林植被类型对坡面产流影响.林业调查规划,2008,33(2):122-127.
[26]闫俊华,周国逸,张德强,王旭.鼎湖山顶级森林生态系统水文要素时空规律.生态学报,2003,23(11):2359-2366.
[27]王玉杰,王云琦.森林对坡面产流的影响研究.世界林业研究,2005,18(3):12-15.
[28]陈强,常恩福,毕波,毕波,李品荣,尹艾萍,刘永国,李玉文.滇东南岩溶地区两种地类的水土流失比较.水土保持研究,2007,14(1):281-283,286-286.
[29]黄荣珍,岳永杰,李凤,谢锦升,杨玉盛.不同类型森林水库调水特性研究.水土保持学报,2008,22(1):154-158.
[30]崔向慧,李海静,王兵.江西大岗山常绿阔叶林生态系统水量平衡的研究.林业科学,2006,42(2):8-12.
[31]韩永刚,杨玉盛.森林水文效应的研究进展.亚热带水土保持,2007,19(2):20-25.
[32]黄志刚.南方红壤丘陵区典型小流域森林生态系统水文过程、调节功能及机制研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2010.
[33]刘世荣,温远光,王兵,周光益.中国森林生态系统水文生态功能规律.北京:中国林业出版社,1996:140-140.
[34]周晓峰.中国森林生态系统定位研究.哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,1994:441-441.
[35]孔维健,周本智,安艳飞,王小明.天然次生林和人工毛竹林水文生态特征比较.水土保持研究,2010,17(1):113-116,139-139.
[36]孔维健,周本智,安艳飞,王刚,王小明,徐升华.人工毛竹林水文生态功能的初步研究.林业科学研究,2010,23(5):713-718.
[37]王彦辉,刘永敏.江西省大岗山毛竹林水文效应研究.林业科学研究,1993,8(4):373-379.
[38]谢锦忠,傅懋毅,肖基浒,肖贤坦,马占兴.丛生竹林生态系统的水文效应研究I.麻竹人工林地表径流规律的初探.竹子研究汇刊,2000,19(4):18-25.
[39]郑郁善,陈卓梅,邱尔发,尤志达,洪有为,陈礼光.不同经营措施笋用麻竹人工林的地表径流研究.生态学报,2003,23(11):2387-2395.
[40]笪志祥,楼一平,董文渊,高艳平.梁山慈竹在退耕还林中的水土保持效应研究.浙江林业科技,2007,27(3):22-27.
[41]吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,汪有科.黄土高原油松林地产流产沙及其过程研究.生态学报,1998,18(2):151-157.
[42]吕皎,王维.太行山中山区六种植被配置模式的水土保持功能研究.土壤通报,2010,41(5):1146-1152.
[43]和爱军,刘文耀,郑征.云南松林与针阔混交林的水土效应.云南林业科技,1990,(3):6-13.
[44]孟广涛,郎南军,方向京,李贵祥,袁春明,温绍龙.滇中华山松人工林的水文特征及水量平衡.林业科学研究,2001,14(1):78-84.
[45]邓红兵,王庆礼.三峡库区小集水区复合生态系统的水分及养分动态.长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(5):432-439.
[46]袁春明,郎南军,孟广涛,方向京,李贵祥,温绍龙.长江上游云南松水土保持林地坡面径流与侵蚀规律的研究.水土保持学报,2003,17(6):74-76.
[47]王晶,包维楷,丁德蓉.九寨沟林下地表径流及其与地表和土壤状况的关系.水土保持学报,2005,19(3):93-96.
[48]雷孝章,曹叔尤,江小华.森林系统对降雨径流的调节转换规律研究.中国水土保持科学,2008,6(S1):24-29.
[49]李生,任华东,姚小华,张守攻,杨实,兰应秋,农美东.典型石漠化地区不同植被类型地表水土流失特征研究.水土保持学报,2009,23(2):1-6.
[50]郑华.森林恢复方式对生态系统服务功能的影响机制研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2004.
[51]李振新.岷江上游三种典型生态系统土壤保持的生态学机制研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2004.
[52]张喜,连宾,尹洁,吴永波,崔迎春.喀斯特洼地不同森林类型的坡面径流和土壤流失动态.安徽农业科学,2010,38(7):3843-3847.
[53]王晓东,张洪江,程金花,孙艳红.三峡库区森林植被坡面产流特性.水土保持研究,2008,15(1):1-3.
[54]金小麒,安和平,杨成华,巫启新.板桥河小流域典型植被的水量平衡及养分动态初步研究.贵州林业科技,1991,16(2):34-41.
[55]刘芝芹,王克勤,李艳梅.云南干热河谷不同坡面产流产沙研究.山西水土保持科技,2009,(4):14-18.
[56]周璟,张旭东,何丹,周金星,周小玲,王中建.湘西北小流域坡面尺度地表径流与侵蚀产沙特征及其影响因素.水土保持学报,2010,24(3):18-22.
[57]田日昌,陈洪松,王克林,谢小立.红壤坡地不同覆被类型地表径流对降水特征的响应.自然资源学报,2009,24(6):1058-1068.
[58]倪三川,胡夏嵩,毛小青,朱海丽,李国荣,陈桂琛.室内模拟降雨条件下黄土植被边坡径流试验研究.水土保持学报,2008,22(5):22-25.
[59]陈杰,刘文兆,张勋昌,侯喜禄,胡梦珺,王兵.黄土丘陵沟壑区林地水文生态效应.生态学报,2008,28(7):2954-2963.
[60]徐学选,穆兴民,蒋定生,王玉,王炜.黄土丘陵区降雨坡面再分配规律研究.水土保持研究,2002,9(3):249-250,253-253.
[2]Dudley N,Stolton S.Running Pure:the Importance of Forest Protected Areas to Drinking Water:A Research Report for the World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use.World Bank/WWF Alliance for Forest Conservation and Sustainable Use,2003.(
[3]欧阳志云,赵同谦,赵景柱,肖寒,王效科.海南岛生态系统生态调节功能及其生态经济价值研究.应用生态学报,2004,15(8):1395-1402.
[4]Daily G C.Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems.4th ed.Washington,DC:Island Press,1997.
[5]刘世荣,孙鹏森,温远光.中国主要森林生态系统水文功能的比较研究(英文).植物生态学报,2003,27(1):16-22.
[6]李文华,何永涛,杨丽韫.森林对径流影响研究的回顾与展望.自然资源学报,2001,16(5):398-406.
[7]张诚,严登华,郝彩莲,秦天玲,王凌河.水的生态服务功能研究进展及关键支撑技术.水科学进展,2011,22(1):126-134.
[8]Jiapaer G L,Chen X,Bao A M.A comparison of methods for estimating fractional vegetation cover in arid regions.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2011,151(12):1698-1710.
[9]中国科学院中国植被图编辑委员会.中国植被及其地理格局:中华人民共和国植被图(1:1000000)说明书.北京:地质出版社,2007.
[10]吴炳方,苑全治,颜长珍,王宗明,于信芳,李爱农,马荣华,黄进良,陈劲松,常存,刘成林,张磊,李晓松,曾源,包安明.21世纪前十年的中国土地覆盖变化.第四纪研究,2014,34(4):723-731.
[11]Zhou G Y,Wei X H,Luo Y,Zhang M F,Li Y L,Qiao Y N,Liu H G,Wang C L.Forest recovery and river discharge at the regional scale of Guangdong Province,China.Water Resources Research,2010,46(9),doi:10.1029/2009WR008829.
[12]Du J,Shi C X,Zhang C D.Modeling and analysis of effects of precipitation and vegetation coverage on runoff and sediment yield in Jinsha River Basin.Water Science and Engineering,2013,6(1):44-58.
[13]曹云,欧阳志云,郑华,黄志刚,邢芳芳.森林生态系统的水文调节功能及生态学机制研究进展.生态环境,2006,15(6):1360-1365.
[14]申彦科,王玉杰,齐娜,杨小梅,李耀明,成晨.重庆市缙云山不同林分对坡面产流的影响.水土保持通报,2009,29(5):80-84.
[15]张晓明,孙中锋,张学培.晋西黄土残塬沟壑区不同林分暴雨产流产沙作用分析.中国水土保持科学,2003,1(3):37-42.
[16]段文标,刘少冲.莲花湖库区水源涵养林林地产流产沙分析.水土保持学报,2006,20(5):12-15.
[17]姜萍,郭芳,罗跃初,魏晶,孙晓伟,吴钢.辽西半干旱区典型人工林生态系统的水土保持功能.应用生态学报,2007,18(12):2905-2909.
[18]潘磊,唐万鹏,黄志霖,史玉虎,马德举,崔鸿侠.长江三峡花岗岩区典型林地暴雨径流特征研究.湖北林业科技,2010,(1):1-4.
[19]黄承标,温远光,李信贤.田林老山常绿落叶阔叶混交林气候及水文效应的研究.广西农学院学报,1991,10(4):52-63.
[20]张喜,薛建辉,许效天,连宾,李克之.黔中喀斯特山地不同森林类型的地表径流及影响因素.热带亚热带植物学报,2008,15(6):527-537.
[21]张洪江,孙艳红,程云,程金花.重庆缙云山不同植被类型对地表径流系数的影响.水土保持学报,2006,20(6):11-13,45-45.
[22]温熙胜,何丙辉,张洪江,何凡,缪驰远.三峡库区缓坡林地产流初探.西南大学学报:自然科学版,2007,29(5):74-80.
[23]祁生林,张洪江,何凡,程金花.重庆四面山植被类型对坡面产流的影响.中国水土保持科学,2006,4(4):33-38.
[24]李耀明,王玉杰,储小院,成晨,齐娜.降雨因子对缙云山地区典型森林植被类型地表径流的影响.水土保持研究,2009,16(4):244-249.
[25]席光超,齐实,王云琦.三峡库区典型森林植被类型对坡面产流影响.林业调查规划,2008,33(2):122-127.
[26]闫俊华,周国逸,张德强,王旭.鼎湖山顶级森林生态系统水文要素时空规律.生态学报,2003,23(11):2359-2366.
[27]王玉杰,王云琦.森林对坡面产流的影响研究.世界林业研究,2005,18(3):12-15.
[28]陈强,常恩福,毕波,毕波,李品荣,尹艾萍,刘永国,李玉文.滇东南岩溶地区两种地类的水土流失比较.水土保持研究,2007,14(1):281-283,286-286.
[29]黄荣珍,岳永杰,李凤,谢锦升,杨玉盛.不同类型森林水库调水特性研究.水土保持学报,2008,22(1):154-158.
[30]崔向慧,李海静,王兵.江西大岗山常绿阔叶林生态系统水量平衡的研究.林业科学,2006,42(2):8-12.
[31]韩永刚,杨玉盛.森林水文效应的研究进展.亚热带水土保持,2007,19(2):20-25.
[32]黄志刚.南方红壤丘陵区典型小流域森林生态系统水文过程、调节功能及机制研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2010.
[33]刘世荣,温远光,王兵,周光益.中国森林生态系统水文生态功能规律.北京:中国林业出版社,1996:140-140.
[34]周晓峰.中国森林生态系统定位研究.哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,1994:441-441.
[35]孔维健,周本智,安艳飞,王小明.天然次生林和人工毛竹林水文生态特征比较.水土保持研究,2010,17(1):113-116,139-139.
[36]孔维健,周本智,安艳飞,王刚,王小明,徐升华.人工毛竹林水文生态功能的初步研究.林业科学研究,2010,23(5):713-718.
[37]王彦辉,刘永敏.江西省大岗山毛竹林水文效应研究.林业科学研究,1993,8(4):373-379.
[38]谢锦忠,傅懋毅,肖基浒,肖贤坦,马占兴.丛生竹林生态系统的水文效应研究I.麻竹人工林地表径流规律的初探.竹子研究汇刊,2000,19(4):18-25.
[39]郑郁善,陈卓梅,邱尔发,尤志达,洪有为,陈礼光.不同经营措施笋用麻竹人工林的地表径流研究.生态学报,2003,23(11):2387-2395.
[40]笪志祥,楼一平,董文渊,高艳平.梁山慈竹在退耕还林中的水土保持效应研究.浙江林业科技,2007,27(3):22-27.
[41]吴钦孝,赵鸿雁,汪有科.黄土高原油松林地产流产沙及其过程研究.生态学报,1998,18(2):151-157.
[42]吕皎,王维.太行山中山区六种植被配置模式的水土保持功能研究.土壤通报,2010,41(5):1146-1152.
[43]和爱军,刘文耀,郑征.云南松林与针阔混交林的水土效应.云南林业科技,1990,(3):6-13.
[44]孟广涛,郎南军,方向京,李贵祥,袁春明,温绍龙.滇中华山松人工林的水文特征及水量平衡.林业科学研究,2001,14(1):78-84.
[45]邓红兵,王庆礼.三峡库区小集水区复合生态系统的水分及养分动态.长江流域资源与环境,2001,10(5):432-439.
[46]袁春明,郎南军,孟广涛,方向京,李贵祥,温绍龙.长江上游云南松水土保持林地坡面径流与侵蚀规律的研究.水土保持学报,2003,17(6):74-76.
[47]王晶,包维楷,丁德蓉.九寨沟林下地表径流及其与地表和土壤状况的关系.水土保持学报,2005,19(3):93-96.
[48]雷孝章,曹叔尤,江小华.森林系统对降雨径流的调节转换规律研究.中国水土保持科学,2008,6(S1):24-29.
[49]李生,任华东,姚小华,张守攻,杨实,兰应秋,农美东.典型石漠化地区不同植被类型地表水土流失特征研究.水土保持学报,2009,23(2):1-6.
[50]郑华.森林恢复方式对生态系统服务功能的影响机制研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2004.
[51]李振新.岷江上游三种典型生态系统土壤保持的生态学机制研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2004.
[52]张喜,连宾,尹洁,吴永波,崔迎春.喀斯特洼地不同森林类型的坡面径流和土壤流失动态.安徽农业科学,2010,38(7):3843-3847.
[53]王晓东,张洪江,程金花,孙艳红.三峡库区森林植被坡面产流特性.水土保持研究,2008,15(1):1-3.
[54]金小麒,安和平,杨成华,巫启新.板桥河小流域典型植被的水量平衡及养分动态初步研究.贵州林业科技,1991,16(2):34-41.
[55]刘芝芹,王克勤,李艳梅.云南干热河谷不同坡面产流产沙研究.山西水土保持科技,2009,(4):14-18.
[56]周璟,张旭东,何丹,周金星,周小玲,王中建.湘西北小流域坡面尺度地表径流与侵蚀产沙特征及其影响因素.水土保持学报,2010,24(3):18-22.
[57]田日昌,陈洪松,王克林,谢小立.红壤坡地不同覆被类型地表径流对降水特征的响应.自然资源学报,2009,24(6):1058-1068.
[58]倪三川,胡夏嵩,毛小青,朱海丽,李国荣,陈桂琛.室内模拟降雨条件下黄土植被边坡径流试验研究.水土保持学报,2008,22(5):22-25.
[59]陈杰,刘文兆,张勋昌,侯喜禄,胡梦珺,王兵.黄土丘陵沟壑区林地水文生态效应.生态学报,2008,28(7):2954-2963.
[60]徐学选,穆兴民,蒋定生,王玉,王炜.黄土丘陵区降雨坡面再分配规律研究.水土保持研究,2002,9(3):249-250,253-253.