基于DEM的淮河源地貌形态类型划分
|
摘要
[目的]对淮河源地貌形态类型进行划分研究,为该区土地利用、旅游和城市规划以及生物多样性保护提供参考依据。[方法]以淮河源地区为研究对象,基于分辨率为30m的DEM数据,采用地貌形态划分方案中具有代表性的柴宗新方案、徐汉明方案和高玄彧方案,运用空间分析中的邻域分析、重分类、地图代数以及转换工具等,分别对各方案下的淮河源地貌形态类型进行划分并与实际勘察地形进行对比与分析,探寻适合淮河源地貌基本形态划分的最佳方案。[结果]柴宗新方案要素单一,不能确切反映地貌的基本特征;高玄彧方案中的2级分类对研究区并未发挥其作用,该方案比较适合高程高,地貌形态类型多的地区;徐汉明方案采用相对高度和海拔高度2个条件作为地貌基本形态划分的依据,此方案即兼顾了绝对高度的客观作用,又考虑了人们观察山地的真实感受,因此徐汉明方案比较适合淮河源地貌形态的划分。[结论]根据徐汉明方案将淮河源地区地貌形态划分为平原、丘陵、低山和中低山4种类型,主要以平原和丘陵为主,表现为东低西高,北低南高的地势特征。
[Objective]Studying on the classification of geomorphologic types in Huaihe River Source to provide reference for land use,tourism,urban planning and biodiversity conservation in this area.[Methods]Taking Huaihe River source as an object of study,adopting the representative landform classification scheme in the Chai Zongxin scheme,Xu Hanming scheme and Gao Xuanyu scheme,using neighborhood analysis,reclassification,map algebra,and conversion tools in spatial analysis,the geomorphologic types of Huaihe River source were classified under each scheme and compared with the actual survey terrain based on the DEM data with a resolution of 30 meters so as to find the most suitable scheme for the basic morphologic classification of the Huaihe River source landforms.[Results]The Chai Zongxin scheme is single factor and can not reflect the basic features of the geomorphology.Gao Xuanyu scheme did not proved its advantages fully in the two grade classification for the study area,as it is more suitable for the area with high elevation and complex landform.The Xu Hanming scheme is based on 2 conditions,both relative height and altitude,that is to say,objective effect and subjective feeling of height were considered for basic morphologic classification of the geomorphology.Therefore,the Xu Hanming scheme is more suitable for the division of geomorphology in Huaihe River Source.[Conclusion]According to the Xu Hanming scheme,the geomorphic form of Huaihe River Source region was divided into 4 types:plain,hilly,low mountain and middle andlow mountain,it is mainly covered by plain and hill,is low in the east and the north part and high in the west and the south part.
[Objective]Studying on the classification of geomorphologic types in Huaihe River Source to provide reference for land use,tourism,urban planning and biodiversity conservation in this area.[Methods]Taking Huaihe River source as an object of study,adopting the representative landform classification scheme in the Chai Zongxin scheme,Xu Hanming scheme and Gao Xuanyu scheme,using neighborhood analysis,reclassification,map algebra,and conversion tools in spatial analysis,the geomorphologic types of Huaihe River source were classified under each scheme and compared with the actual survey terrain based on the DEM data with a resolution of 30 meters so as to find the most suitable scheme for the basic morphologic classification of the Huaihe River source landforms.[Results]The Chai Zongxin scheme is single factor and can not reflect the basic features of the geomorphology.Gao Xuanyu scheme did not proved its advantages fully in the two grade classification for the study area,as it is more suitable for the area with high elevation and complex landform.The Xu Hanming scheme is based on 2 conditions,both relative height and altitude,that is to say,objective effect and subjective feeling of height were considered for basic morphologic classification of the geomorphology.Therefore,the Xu Hanming scheme is more suitable for the division of geomorphology in Huaihe River Source.[Conclusion]According to the Xu Hanming scheme,the geomorphic form of Huaihe River Source region was divided into 4 types:plain,hilly,low mountain and middle andlow mountain,it is mainly covered by plain and hill,is low in the east and the north part and high in the west and the south part.
引文
[1]张磊.基于地形起伏度的地貌类型划分研究:以京津冀地区为例[D].河北石家庄:河北师范大学,2008.
[2]苏时雨,李锯章.地貌制图[M].北京:测绘出版社,1999:3-64.
[3]李锯章.中国地貌基本形态划分的探讨[J].地理研究,1987,6(2):32-39.
[4]李炳元,潘保田,韩嘉福.中国陆地基本地貌类型及其划分指标探讨[J].第四纪研究,2008,28(4):535-545.
[5]宋佳.基于DEM的我国地貌形态类型自动划分研究[D].陕西西安:西北大学,2006.
[6]赵晋陵,大湄公河次区域宏观地貌形态类型划分研究[J].测绘科学,2013,38(2):50-52.
[7]胡最,聂阳意.基于DEM的湖南省地貌形态特征分类[J].地理与地理信息科学,2015,31(6):67-71.
[8]曹伟超,陶和平,孔博,等.基于DEM数据分割的西南地区地貌自动识别研究[J].中国水土保持,2011(3):38-41.
[9]陈加兵,李慧,陈文慧,等.基于DEM与DLG的福建省地貌形态自动分类[J].地球信息科学学报,2013,15(1):75-79.
[10]程维明,周成虎,柴慧霞,等.中国陆地地貌基本形态类型定量提取与分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2009,11(6):725-736.
[11]高玄彧.地貌基本形态的主客分类法[J].山地学报,2004,22(3):261-266.
[12]高玄彧.地貌类型混合法研究[J]地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(2):83-87.
[13]高玄彧.地貌类型主维分类法的研究[D].四川成都:成都理工大学,2006.
[14]涂汉明,刘振东.中国地势起伏度研究[J].测绘学报,1991,20(4):311-319.
[15]彭荣胜.淮河源旅游产业发展对生物多样性保护的影响研究[J].生态经济,2012(7):157-160.
[16]柴宗新.按相对高度划分地貌基本形态的建议[C].北京:测绘出版社,1986.
[2]苏时雨,李锯章.地貌制图[M].北京:测绘出版社,1999:3-64.
[3]李锯章.中国地貌基本形态划分的探讨[J].地理研究,1987,6(2):32-39.
[4]李炳元,潘保田,韩嘉福.中国陆地基本地貌类型及其划分指标探讨[J].第四纪研究,2008,28(4):535-545.
[5]宋佳.基于DEM的我国地貌形态类型自动划分研究[D].陕西西安:西北大学,2006.
[6]赵晋陵,大湄公河次区域宏观地貌形态类型划分研究[J].测绘科学,2013,38(2):50-52.
[7]胡最,聂阳意.基于DEM的湖南省地貌形态特征分类[J].地理与地理信息科学,2015,31(6):67-71.
[8]曹伟超,陶和平,孔博,等.基于DEM数据分割的西南地区地貌自动识别研究[J].中国水土保持,2011(3):38-41.
[9]陈加兵,李慧,陈文慧,等.基于DEM与DLG的福建省地貌形态自动分类[J].地球信息科学学报,2013,15(1):75-79.
[10]程维明,周成虎,柴慧霞,等.中国陆地地貌基本形态类型定量提取与分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2009,11(6):725-736.
[11]高玄彧.地貌基本形态的主客分类法[J].山地学报,2004,22(3):261-266.
[12]高玄彧.地貌类型混合法研究[J]地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(2):83-87.
[13]高玄彧.地貌类型主维分类法的研究[D].四川成都:成都理工大学,2006.
[14]涂汉明,刘振东.中国地势起伏度研究[J].测绘学报,1991,20(4):311-319.
[15]彭荣胜.淮河源旅游产业发展对生物多样性保护的影响研究[J].生态经济,2012(7):157-160.
[16]柴宗新.按相对高度划分地貌基本形态的建议[C].北京:测绘出版社,1986.