临床护理路径在老年高血压患者中的作用分析
|
摘要
目的探讨临床护理路径对控制血压、降低并发症的影响。方法将129例老年高血压患者进行随机分成实验组和对照组,实验组患者行临床护理路径干预,对照组实施常规护理,两组护理前后血压水平及并发症进行比较。结果两组护理前血压水平相比,差异不明显(P> 0.05),实验组护理后舒张压、收缩压水平与对照组相比,下降更低(P<0.05);实验组并发症率为3.08%,与对照组9.37%相比,发生更低(P <0.05)。结论老年高血压患者实施临床护理路径安全可行,血压控制效果良好,并发症发生率有效降低。
Objective To explore the effect of clinical nursing pathway on controlling blood pressure and reducing complications. Methods129 elderly patients with hypertension were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group received clinical nursing path intervention, while the control group received routine nursing. Blood pressure level and complications before and after nursing were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in blood pressure level between the two groups before nursing(P > 0.05). The diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group(P < 0.05).The complication rate in the experimental group was 3.08%, and was lower than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion The clinical nursing pathway for elderly patients with hypertension is safe and feasible. The effect of blood pressure control is good, and the incidence of complications is effectively reduced.
Objective To explore the effect of clinical nursing pathway on controlling blood pressure and reducing complications. Methods129 elderly patients with hypertension were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group received clinical nursing path intervention, while the control group received routine nursing. Blood pressure level and complications before and after nursing were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in blood pressure level between the two groups before nursing(P > 0.05). The diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group(P < 0.05).The complication rate in the experimental group was 3.08%, and was lower than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion The clinical nursing pathway for elderly patients with hypertension is safe and feasible. The effect of blood pressure control is good, and the incidence of complications is effectively reduced.
引文
[1]王飞宇.综合护理对老年高血压患者血压及并发症的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志, 2016,20(8):1-3.
[2]李玉花.个体化护理对老年高血压患者血压及并发症的作用探讨[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(4):541-543.
[3]于淼,罗萍,罗俊彪.个性化护理在老年高血压临床治疗中对患者并发症和血压的影响[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(6):88-91.
[4]张帆.个体化护理对老年高血压患者血压及并发症的影响观察[J].养生保健指南,2016,2(51):100.
[5]安景慧.综合护理干预应用老年高血压患者对其血压及并发症的影响[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(53):10403.
[6]张美芹,刘淑萍.护理干预对老年高血压患者血压及并发症的影响[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2016,4(10):207.
[7]余峥.临床护理路径对慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院患者依从性及护理质量影响[J].医药理论与实践,2017,30(23):3561-3563.
[8]张玲珠.对老年高血压患者进行综合护理的效果分析[J].当代医药论丛,2015,13(23):128-129.
[9]郝永红,秦娅丽,王红,等.综合护理干预在老年高血压伴动脉粥样硬化患者中的应用效果[J].广西医科大学学报,2017,34(1):143-147.
[10]林秋娟.综合护理干预在提高中老年高血压患者防治依从性及改善其生活质量中的作用[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(4):226-228.
[11]周晓敏,高翠霞,王琴丽,等.临床护理路径应用对老年高血压患者血压水平稳定性及生活质量的影响[J].广西医科大学学报,2016,33(4):755-757.
[12]石蕾.临床护理路径在社区老年高血压患者健康教育中的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(23):188-190.
[2]李玉花.个体化护理对老年高血压患者血压及并发症的作用探讨[J].医学理论与实践,2016,29(4):541-543.
[3]于淼,罗萍,罗俊彪.个性化护理在老年高血压临床治疗中对患者并发症和血压的影响[J].中国医学创新,2017,14(6):88-91.
[4]张帆.个体化护理对老年高血压患者血压及并发症的影响观察[J].养生保健指南,2016,2(51):100.
[5]安景慧.综合护理干预应用老年高血压患者对其血压及并发症的影响[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(53):10403.
[6]张美芹,刘淑萍.护理干预对老年高血压患者血压及并发症的影响[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2016,4(10):207.
[7]余峥.临床护理路径对慢性阻塞性肺疾病住院患者依从性及护理质量影响[J].医药理论与实践,2017,30(23):3561-3563.
[8]张玲珠.对老年高血压患者进行综合护理的效果分析[J].当代医药论丛,2015,13(23):128-129.
[9]郝永红,秦娅丽,王红,等.综合护理干预在老年高血压伴动脉粥样硬化患者中的应用效果[J].广西医科大学学报,2017,34(1):143-147.
[10]林秋娟.综合护理干预在提高中老年高血压患者防治依从性及改善其生活质量中的作用[J].中国继续医学教育,2017,9(4):226-228.
[11]周晓敏,高翠霞,王琴丽,等.临床护理路径应用对老年高血压患者血压水平稳定性及生活质量的影响[J].广西医科大学学报,2016,33(4):755-757.
[12]石蕾.临床护理路径在社区老年高血压患者健康教育中的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(23):188-190.