摘要
以牙鲆为实验对象,研究了4种不同规格的T型标志牌(T-A、T-B、T-C和T-D)对全长5、7、9和11cm苗种的标记效果,确立了适宜标志的牙鲆苗种规格,筛选了适宜于不同规格牙鲆苗种标记用的T型标志牌。全长5cm的苗种不宜使用这4种规格的标志牌标记;T-A和T-B标志牌适宜于全长7~11cm的牙鲆苗种,标记后脱牌率为2%~8%,存活率为90%~100%;T-C标志牌适宜于标记全长11cm的苗种,成活率为94%,脱牌率为5%,对全长7~9cm苗种的标志效果不佳,成活率为85%~87%,脱牌率为9%~11%;T-D标志牌不适宜于全长11cm以下牙鲆苗种的标记,脱牌率为11%~26%,成活率为51%~89%。2011~2012年,利用T-B标志牌在北戴河开展了牙鲆大规模标志放流试验,取得了良好的标记效果。
Japanese flounder,Paralichthys olivaceus juveniles were tagged with four kinds of T-bar tags(T-A,T-B,T-C,and T-D).The tag-shedding rate,survival rate,swimming and feeding behavior,growth performance of juveniles post tagging were observed and recorded.Based on these data,we determined the suitable T-bar tag for Japanese flounder juveniles at different size.The results showed that all four kinds of T-bar tags were not suitable for Japanese flounder juveniles with total length less than 5cm due to the low survival rate and high tag-shedding rate.The T-A and T-B tags were suitable for Japanese flounder juveniles with total length of 7-11cm with survival rate of 90%-100%and tag-shedding rate of 2%-8%.For TC tag,the tag-shedding rate was 5% when it was used to tag juveniles with total length of 11 cm with survival rate of 94%.The T-C tag was not suitable for juveniles with total length of 7-9cm.For T-D tag,all groups showed low survival rates(51%-89%)and high tag-shedding rates(11%-26%)post tagging,therefore,the T-D tag was not suitable for juveniles less than 11cm in total length.Based on these results,we carried out pilot tagging studies on Japanese flounder juveniles using T-B tag from 2011to 2012.During this period,millions of juveniles were released into the sea,and 169,000juveniles were tagged using T-B tag,which would be helpful for evaluation of enhancement effects.
引文
方民杰,杜琦.2008.双斑东方鲀标志放流的初步研究.台湾海峡,27(3):325-328
刘奇.2009.褐牙鲆标志技术与增殖放流试验研究.见中国海洋大学硕士研究生学位论文,50-66罗新,张其中,崔淼.2011.草鱼标志技术的初步研究.水生态学杂志,32(6):135-140
王秀华,张烨伟,杨春志.2009.MS-222对牙鲆麻醉效果.渔业科学进展,30(3):1-6
吴鹤洲,阮洪超,王新成,吴佩秋,成贵书,杨伟祥.1987.胶州湾牙鲆资源增殖的生态学基础及种苗放流实验研究.海洋科学,6:52-53
张堂林,李钟杰,舒少武.2003.鱼类标志技术的研究进展.中国水产科学,10(3):246-253
Bégout AML,Covès D,Dutto G and 2others.2003.Tagging juvenile seabass and sole with telemetry transmitters:medium-term effects on growth.ICES J Mar Sci 60(6):1328-1334
Brattey J,Cadigan N.2004.Estimation of short-term tagging mortality of adult Atlantic cod(Gadus morhua).Fish Res 66(2-3):223-233
Davis TLO,Reid DD.1982.Estimates of tag-shedding rates for Floy FT-2dart and FD-67anchor tags in Barramundi Lates calcarifer(Bloch).Aust J Mar Freshw Res 33(6):1113-1117
Jolivet A,Pontual H,Garren F and 1other.2009.Effects of T-bar and DST tagging on survival and growth of European hake.Reviews:Methods and Technologies in Fish Biol Fisheries 9:181-193
Morgan RIG,Roberts RJ.1976.The histopathology of salmon tagging:IV.The effect of severe exercise on the induced tagging lesion in salmon parr at two temperatures.J Fish Biol 8(4):289-292
OtterH,Kristiansen TS,Svsand T.1998.Evaluation of anchor tags used in sea-ranching experiments with atlantic cod(Gadus morhua L.).Fish Res 35(3):237-246
Righton D,Kjesbu OS,Metcalfe J.2006.A field and experimental evaluation on the effect of data storage tags on the growth of cod.J Fish Biol68 (2):385-400
Tatsuya I,Yasushi A,Ryosei N.2006.Stock enhancement and management of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus in Sagemi Bay of Kanagawa prefecture.Bull Jap Soc Fish Ocean 70(4):249-255
Waldman JR,Dunning DJ,Mattson MT.1990.A morphological explanation for size-dependent anchor tag loss from striped bass.Trans Am Fish Soc 119(5):920-923